1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
The new right view education through an economic lens:
they see skills as part of a system that should promote competition, choice and efficiency
Schools should focus on raising standards to meet the needs of the global economy
They advocate for greater marketisation, where schools compete like businesses and parents act as consumers
competition improves standards and efficiency
Under performing skills should lose funding or be taken over, while successful ones are rewarded
What do the New Right say about the state?
They believe that the state interferes too much peoples lives and should instead play a minimal role in society
They believe the state has failed to provide high-quality education, and its rule should be limited to:
Setting the national curriculum to promote shared values
E.g. British history, Christian values and citizenship to promote social cohesion
Ensuring a framework for schools to operate in
Via Ofsted, league tables and standardised testing, this state helps monitor school quality while allowing school choice and competition
Chubb + Moe
Key New Right thinkers who argue that:
State schools have failed to meet the needs of pupils, parents and the economy because:
The standard of education is low, especially for disadvantage groups
They have failed to produce workers with the right skills
They have led to high levels of unemployment
Privately run skills in the USA perform better because they are accountable to paying consumers
they recommend a voucher system where parents are given public money to spend on a school of their choice
This would force skills to compete, raise standards and be more responsive to parental demand
Chubb and Moe believed this would create a parentocracy – a system driven by consumer power, not government control
Influence on education policy
Venue right has had a major impact on UK education since the 1980s:
1980s - 1990s: introduction of vocational education and marketisation, under the 1988 education reform act
1997-2010 - new labour supported academies and performance targets, (shows the New Right influence even under centre-left governments)
2010-2015 - The coalition government expanded academies and free schools, this reinforced privatisation and parental choice
Evaluation of the new right perspective: Strengths
Focus on standards and accountability
By introducing Ofsted inspections, league tables and standardised testing, schools became more accountable for student outcomes
These measures have improved results and some failing schools
Promotion of parental choice
By giving parents the right to choose, schools having improved in attracting pupils
This parentocracy supposedly empowered families and encouraged innovation
influential policy reforms
New right thinking has led to the creation of academies and a focus on traditional teaching
These reforms have led higher exam results in some disadvantage areas
Evaluation of the new right perspective: criticisms
reproduction of inequality
Argue that middle class parents are better able to exercise school choice due to their economic and cultural capital
This reinforces social class divisions
marketisation favours high performing students
Skills are incentivised to reward the most able students and discriminate against those who require extra support
This creates a two tier system and undermines the idea of equality of opportunity
Ethnocentric and narrow curriculum
The national curriculum is criticised for reflecting a white, middle class, Eurocentric view of British history and culture
This fails to represent the diversity of UK society and main marginalised ethnic minorities and working class students
Profit over pupils
The increasing role of private providers in education raise concerns about the commodification of learning
Marxists argue that when companies prioritise profit, educational quality and student welfare can suffer