1/27
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Classical Model
Assumes a rational decision maker is fully informed, sensitive to distinctions, and fully rational.
Subjective Expected Utility Theory
Theory stating people weigh outcomes based on subjective utility and subjective probability.
Heuristics
Mental shortcuts that help make decisions quickly, but can lead to errors.
Satisficing
Stopping the search once a good enough option is found.
Representativeness Heuristic
Judging something based on how closely it resembles a mental prototype.
Availability Heuristic
Judging based on how easily something comes to mind.
Anchoring
Relying on an initial reference point and adjusting insufficiently.
Framing
Influence on decisions by how choices are presented.
Illusory Correlation
Belief that two unrelated things are correlated.
Overconfidence
Overestimating one’s own abilities.
Hindsight Bias
Feeling like you 'knew it all along' after an event occurs.
Gambler's Fallacy
Belief that past random events influence future events.
Hot Hand Fallacy
Believing that success will continue based on recent successes.
Conjunction Fallacy
Thinking specific conditions are more probable than general ones.
Sunk-Cost Fallacy
Continuing an endeavor due to previously invested resources.
Group Decision Making Conditions
Efficient when small size, open communication, shared mindset, and respect for norms are present.
Groupthink
A phenomenon where the desire for harmony leads to poor decision-making.
Symptoms of Groupthink
Closed-mindedness, rationalization, squelching dissent, mindguards, feeling invulnerable, illusion of unanimity.
Antidotes to Groupthink
Encouragement of criticism, bringing outside opinions, and assigning a devil's advocate.
Deductive Reasoning
Drawing specific conclusions from general premises.
Modus Ponens
If p, then q; p is true, therefore q is true.
Modus Tollens
If p, then q; q is false, therefore p is false.
Syllogistic Reasoning
Drawing conclusions from categorical statements.
Inductive Reasoning
Making generalizations from specific examples.
Causal Inferences
Determining the cause-and-effect relationships between variables.
Categorical Inferences
Conclusions drawn from observations, either bottom-up or top-down.
Reasoning by Analogy
Drawing conclusions based on similarities between new and known situations.
Purpose of Inductive Reasoning
To make sense of complexity, predict future events, and reduce uncertainty.