1/90
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
4 communication styles
1) Action
2) Process
3) People
4) Idea
Action Communication styles has:
Results
Objectives
Achieving
doing
Process Communication styles has:
Strategies
Organization
facts
People Communication styles has:
communication
relationships
teamwork
Idea Communication styles has:
Concepts
Theories
innovation
People with action style are:
pragmatic, direct, decisive, quick, impatient
People with process style are:
Systematic (step-by-step), logic (cause & effect), factual
People with people style are:
Warm, subjective, emotional, spontaneous, sensitive
People with Idea style are:
Imaginative, unrealistic, creative, full of ideas, charismatic, difficult to understand
People with action style talk about:
results, objectives, responsibility, challenges
People with Process style talk about:
Facts, procedures, analysis, details, observations
People with People style care about:
Teamwork, people, cooperation, feelings, values, beliefs
People with Idea style talk about:
New methods, opportunities, potential alternatives, innovation, what’s new
People with Action style care about:
Productivity, performance, achievements, efficiency
Communicating with an Action person:
Focus on result first; state conclusion
State your best recommendation, do no offer many alternatives
Be as brief as possible
Emphasize the practicality of your ideas use visual aids
Communicating with a Process person
Be precise, state the facts
Organize your discussion in logical order
Break down your recommendations
Include options and alternatives with pros & cons
Outline your proposal
Communicating with a People person
Allow for small talk; do not start discussion right away
Stress the relationship between your proposal and the people concerned
Show how the idea worked well in the past
Use an informal writing style
Communicating with an Idea person
Allow enough time for discussion
Do not get impatient when they go off topic
Stress the uniqueness of the idea or topic at hand
Emphasize future value or relate the impact of the idea to the future
Small groups is usually ____, but ideally ___ members
3-15; 5-7
how do small groups try to solve problems?
Interaction among 3 or more people working together interdependently for the purpose of accomplishing a task
What groups can you belong in?
Sport teams
In organizations: committees
At school: study group, sorority
Others: alcoholics anonymous
Characteristics:
Cohesiveness
Interdependence
Commitment
Group norms
Member roles
Cultures
Cohesiveness
working together and feeling connected
Interdependence
members rely on one another. Collaboration and interrelated performance.
Commitment
shared goals
Group norms
formal or informal rules guiding behaviors
Members roles
positions or functions within a group
Cultures
practices that a group develops to make it distinctive from other groups
Centralized
feel disconnected, less cohesiveness; good to have when leader is strong
Decentralized
good to build cohesiveness, good to have on complex task; may slow down activities
Group Leader Power
Interpersonal influence that forms the basis for group leadership
Types of group leader
1) Reward Power
2) Coercive Power
3) Legitimate
4) Referent Power
5) Expert Power
Referent Power
Power based on respect or loyalty
Identification, liking, charisma
Reward Power
The ability to give something of value
Coercive power
The ability to punish someone
Legitimate
Someone’s role/title
Assigned leader, title
Expert Power
One’s experience/knowledge is valued by other members
Development model:
1) Forming
2) Storming
3) Norming
4) Performing
5) Adjourning
Forming:
Little agreement
Unclear purpose
Guidance and direction
Storming
Conflict
Increased clarity of purpose
Power struggles
coaching
Norming
agreement and consensus
clear roles & responsibility
facilitation
Performing
clear vision & purpose
focus on goal achievement
delegation
Adjourning
task completion
good feeling about achievements
recognition
Conflict management strategies
Care about others vs care about yourself
Avoidance
low on both assertiveness and cooperation
view conflict as worthless and punishing
stay away from conflict
Accommodating
higher concern for others than self
view conflict as destructive
believe surface harmony, good relationship
Competing
higher value on personal goal than others
conflict as win-lose situation
respect for power
Collaborating
higher value on self and others
conflict as beneficial if handled openly
guide group through problem-solving procedure
spend time to reach a consensus
Conflict types:
A-Type conflict
C-Type Conflict
A-Type conflict:
affective conflict
emotional and personal
sidetracks the team from the issues and creates defensiveness and anger
C-type conflict:
cognitive conflict
focus on problems and task
Improves team productivity and creates a feeling of satisfaction
Ground Rules #1
Direct feedback toward behavior rather than toward the person
Attacking the individual
Separating ideas from the person
Ground Rules #2
Feedback should be descriptive (honest & objective), not evaluative (judgmental & accusatory)
Problem Solving Procedure
Analyze
Generate
Evaluate
Decide
Plan
Analyze
Describe and analyze the problem
Generate
Generate possible solutions
Evaluate
Evaluate all solutions
Decide
Decide on a solution
Plan
Plan how to implement the solution
Analyze 5 W’s:
Who
What
When
Where
Why
Generate possible solutions
Brainstorm
State as many alternatives as possible
Accept all ideas without criticism
Strength: encourage all members to participate
Evaluate and make decision
T chart of Positives vs Negatives of each solution
Plan to implement the solution
State
List
Place
Make
State
State you goal and deadline clearly
List
All steps that need to be completed in order to accomplish the goal
Place
Place tasks on a timeline
Make
Make sure everyone knows his/her role and goals
Why do we communicate?
inclusion
affection
control
features of personal relationship:
uniqueness
commitment
relationship rules
Personality: 5-factor model
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Conscientiousness
Emotional stability
Openness
Personality of Extraversion:
sociable, assertive, active, and talkative
Personality of Agreeableness:
being likable, adaptable, cooperative, cheerful, warm, & tolerant
Personality of Conscientiousness:
responsible, dependable, organized, persevering, & willing to achieve
Personality of Emotional Stability:
calm, self-confident rather than moody and tense
Personality of Openness
creative, imaginative, intelligent, broad-minded, curious, and artistically sensitive
Style of Loving:
eros
storge
ludus
mania
agape
pragma
Eros:
passionate, tense, fast moving
Storge
comfortable, “best” friends, stable
Ludus
playful; love is a game
Mania
emotional extremes, insecure
Agape
selfless, generous, devoted
Pragma
pragmatic, goal-oriented
Forming relationship: attraction theory
physical attraction
proximity
similarity
reciprocity
Relational development: coming together; 5 stages
1) Initiating
2) Experimenting
3) Intensifying
4) Integrating
5) Bonding
Relationship deterioration: coming apart; 5 stages
1) Differentiating
2) Circumscribing
3) Stagnating
4) Avoiding
5) Terminating
Relational Dialectics Theory
Individuals swing back and forth between contradictory desires
People try to reconcile their conflicting desires
Three dialectics that affect relationships
Autonomy & connection
Openness & protection
Novelty & predictability
Autonomy and connection
Separation and integration
This tension is a primary strain in all relationships
Openness and protection
Expression and non-expression
A couple also faces the revelation and concealment dilemma of what to tell others
Novelty and predictability
Stability and change
The need for both interpersonal certainty and novelty