1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
AWARENESS (ACCC) - Consumer Redress and Remedies
Australian Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
Whistleout, 2025 - ‘Is your power bank safe? Recalls prompt ACCC warning’ - 17 recalls
SELF-HELP (COMPLAINTS TO SUPPLIERS AND MANUFACTURERS) - Consumer Redress and Remedies
Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)
Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW)
ABC, 2024 - ‘More grievance against prosthetic eye maker Jack McDonald’s work’
STATE GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS (NSW FAIR TRADING) - Consumer Redress and Remedies
Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)
ABC, 2025 - ‘NSW government pushes back e-bike certification fine after industry ‘confusion’
STATE GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS (NSW OMBUDSMAN) - Consumer Redress and Remedies
Ombudsman Act 1974 (NSW)
ABC, 2024 - ‘NSW Ombudsman asked to investigate whether former government ignored legal advice to charge millions in merchant fees
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS (ASIC) - Consumer Redress and Remedies
Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth)
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
ASIC v Westpac Banking Corporation (2018)
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS (ACCC) - Consumer Redress and Remedies
Australian Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
ACCC v Visy Industries Pty Ltd (2007) - $36 million
ACCC v Trivago (2020) - $44.7 million
NATIONAL CREDIT CODE (CREDIT) - Contemporary Issue
National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009
ABC, 2022 - ‘Charities, consumer groups launch campaign for better regulation of buy now, pay later services’ - $8000 debt
ABC, 2023 ‘ANZ accused of irresponsible lending, experts warn risk of misrepresented loans grows as rates rise’
ASIC (CREDIT) - Contemporary Issue
Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth)
ASIC v Westpac Banking Corporation (2018)
ASIC v Kobelt (2019)
AFCA (CREDIT) - Contemporary Issue
Australian Financial Complaints Authority Act 2018 (Cth)
Broker Daily, 2015 - ‘Financial complaints ‘unacceptably high’, says AFCA - over 100,000 complaints in 2024-25
COMMON LAW PROTECTION (UNJUST CONTRACTS) - Nature of Consumer Law
Johnson v Buttress (1936)
Australian Knitting Mills v Grant (1936)
Telstra (2017) - fined for acting unconscionably and breaching the ACL when staff signed up First Nations consumers to post-paid mobile contracts, even though they did not understand and could not afford the packages.
STATUTORY PROTECTION (UNJUST CONTRACTS) - Nature of Consumer Law
Australian Consumer Law (ACL, 2011) - Section 25
Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW)
Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)
ABC, 2025 - ‘Optus to face $100 million penalty for unconscionable conduct selling products to vulnerable customers’
STATUTORY PROTECTION (REGULATION OF MARKETING AND ADVERTISING) - Nature of Consumer Law
Australian Consumer Law (ACL, 2011) - fines of up to $50,000,000 (s.29 and 35)
Nurofen v ACCC (2016) - $6 million fine
ACCC v Harvey Norman (2011) - infringement notice of $6,600
ACCC V Samsung Electronics (2022) - $14 million fine for false, misleading, and deceptive representations about the water resistance of ‘Galaxy’ mobile phones
NON-STATUTORY CONTROLS (REGULATION OF MARKETING AND ADVERTISING) - Nature of Consumer Law
Ad Standards - Advertising Standards Board (ASB) and Advertising Claims Board (ACB)
ABC, 2024 - ‘What 2024’s most complained-about ads tells us about industry trends’ - 4000 complaints, reviewed 278 and upheld 88
Australian Association of National Advertisers (AANA) Code of Ethics 2012
SELF-REGULATION (OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING) - Nature of Consumer Law
Australian Medical Association
ABC, 2023 - ‘Australian Medical Association calls for national regulations around AI in healthcare’
STATE-REGULATION (OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING) - Nature of Consumer Law
Motor Dealers and Repairers Act 2013 (NSW) - max penalty of $110,000 or 12-months jail
Motor Dealers and Repairers Amendment (Miscellaneous) Regulation 2021
Fair Trading NSW, 2022 - Anthony Lee Francis, Public Warning
GOVERNMENT PROTECTION (NEGLIGENCE) - Nature of Consumer Law
Breach of the duty of reasonable care owed - risk of harm was foreseeable, risk of harm was not insignificant, and a reasonable person would have taken precautions to avoid a breach.
Australian Consumer Law (ACL, 2011)
→ ss.129-130 (safety warning notices), ss. 104-108 (compulsory safety standards), ss. 3-5 (compensation for consumers who suffer injury)
Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)
PRODUCT SAFETY AUSTRALIA (NEGLIGENCE) - Nature of Consumer Law
Australian Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
ABC, 2025 - ‘City Beach hit with ACCC legal action for alleged sale of non-compliant products’
NON-LEGAL RESPONSE (MEDIA)
ABC, 2016 - ‘Perth woman ‘badly burned’ after Thermomix kitchen appliance ‘bursts open’
CHANGING VALUES
Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)