forensic psychology case law

muller v oregon

precedent for using outside experts to provide information in court (brandeis briefs)

brown v board of education

desegregating US public schools

daubert vs merrell dow pharmaceuticals

admissibility of scientific evidence is case-by-case determined by evidentiary hearings

united states vs scheffer

lack of consensus about scientific validity and reliability about polygraphing

miranda v arizona

right to remain silent, be appointed an attorney, have an attorney present during questioning, acknowledge your understanding of the previous rights

arizona v fulminante

police cannot lie to you about providing protection if you confess

people v mcrae

police cannot create a phony lineup with a fake eyewitness against you as the suspect to coerce you

people vs wesley

dna evidence admissible in the US courts

williams, bazille, et al vs alioto et al

cannot detain based on race alone, has to fit the suspect profile with actual reasoning

melendres v arpaio

cannot pull over drivers just because of their race

neil v biggers

a full lineup is the most effective scientifically rather than one by one

manson v braithwaite

identifying someone doesnt mean you can exclude evidence

state vs henderson

manson criteria ruled insufficient

taylor v louisiana

women intentionally left off jury = jury not representative of community unconstitutional

guest vs leis and independent newspapers inc v brodie

unless your social media is private it is legally fair game