Two-Process Theory of Avoidance: Classical and Operant Conditioning in Fear Reduction

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/21

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:01 PM on 3/19/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

22 Terms

1
New cards

What does active avoidance involve?

A negative R-O contingency where making a response prevents something bad from happening.

2
New cards

Why was active avoidance puzzling to early psychologists?

Because conditioned responding appeared to develop in the absence of reinforcement (shock delivery).

3
New cards

What are the two learning mechanisms involved in the Two-Process Theory of Avoidance?

Classical conditioning and operant conditioning.

4
New cards

What is the first process in the Two-Process Theory of Avoidance?

Learning to associate the warning stimulus with an aversive stimulus (e.g., shock).

5
New cards

What is the warning stimulus in the Two-Process Theory of Avoidance?

The conditioned stimulus (CS) such as a light that signals an impending shock.

6
New cards

What is the unconditioned stimulus (US) in the Two-Process Theory of Avoidance?

The aversive stimulus, such as shock.

7
New cards

What is the conditioned response (CR) in the Two-Process Theory of Avoidance?

Fear in response to the conditioned stimulus (CS).

8
New cards

What does the second process in the Two-Process Theory of Avoidance involve?

Learning to make a response that reduces fear during the warning stimulus.

9
New cards

What does the Two-Process Theory of Avoidance reduce avoidance learning to?

Escape learning, where the organism learns to escape from the CS and the fear it elicits.

10
New cards

What did Brown & Jacobs (1949) demonstrate in their experiment?

That animals learn to escape from a fear-inducing CS, supporting the Two-Process Theory of Avoidance.

11
New cards

What was the setup of the classical conditioning phase in Brown & Jacobs' experiment?

Rats were isolated in a shuttle box with a pulsating light/tone CS paired with foot shock.

12
New cards

What was the outcome of the instrumental task phase in Brown & Jacobs' experiment?

Rats learned to move to the opposite side of the box to escape the CS, with response latency measured.

13
New cards

What did Esmorís-Arranz et al. (2003) study in their acquired-drive experiment?

The effects of delayed and simultaneous conditioning on rats' ability to escape from a fear-inducing CS.

14
New cards

What was the result of the delayed conditioning group in Esmorís-Arranz et al.'s experiment?

They learned to escape from fear effectively.

15
New cards

What was the control group in Esmorís-Arranz et al.'s experiment?

Rats that were presented with the same CS and US but were unpaired.

16
New cards

How does the Two-Process Theory of Avoidance relate to fear reduction?

As subjects become better at avoiding the aversive US, their fear should decrease.

17
New cards

What stimuli were used in the college students' conditioning study?

Three colored block stimuli: A+, B+, and C-.

18
New cards

What was the difference between Stimulus A+ and Stimulus B+?

A+ allowed avoidance of shock by pressing a button, while B+ did not allow avoidance.

19
New cards

What was the control stimulus (C-) in the college students' study?

A stimulus that was never paired with shock.

20
New cards

What was measured to assess fear in the college students' study?

Skin conductance and shock expectancy ratings.

21
New cards

What trend was observed in fear levels for Stimulus A+ over trials?

Fear decreased as subjects became better at avoiding the shock.

22
New cards

What trend was observed in fear levels for Stimulus B+ over trials?

Fear increased as subjects could not avoid the shock.

Explore top flashcards