1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
P
E
T
Practical
Ethical
Theoretical perspective (interpretivist/positivist)
P
E
R
V
E
R
T
Practical
Ethical
Reliable (replicable)
Valid (true picture)
Evidence (case studies, examples)
Representative (generalisations)
Theoretical perspective (interpretivist/positivist)
6 things to consider re. practicality
Research opportunity
Can you easily access the group or would it be one-off?
Cost
Requirements of funding bodies
Less socially desirable projects that may reflect badly on the funding body are likely to be denied funding
Time
Personal skills/characteristics
If you’re terrible at building a rapport with people you don’t know, maybe interviews aren’t the best method
Subject matter
Practical issue surrounding studying W/C people + methods
Issue: lack of time due to working long hours and multiple jobs
Method: observation
Less demanding of them - doesn’t require their time
Financial incentive could make the research worth their while
Practical issues surrounding studying recent migrants to the UK + methods
Issue: language barrier, personal characteristics (they may want to speak to someone with similar experiences to them)
Method: questionnaires - easy to translate responses and questions
Interviews and observations would be difficult to translate as an interpreter couldn’t keep up
Practical issues surrounding studying sub-cultural groups + methods + solution
Issues: access (especially to deviant groups), personal characteristcs (they may be distrustful of someone outside their circle)
Methods: covert observation (but could become stalking), snowball sampling
Solution: need a gatekeeper - somoeone with better access
Practical issues surrounding studying victimes of DV + solution
Issue: personal characteristics (gender) can be a sensitive issue
Solution: female researcher
Impacts of practical issues on choice of method - time
Less time = smaller or geographically limited sample size
Issues
Not as representative - more people = closer to true value
Unable to generalise
Less reliable results
Impacts of practical issues on choice of method - funding
Less funding = smaller sample size
No incentive = lower response rate
Unrepresentative, may miss important voices
Unable to generalise
Impacts of practical issues on choice of method - access to participants
Illiteracy = inability to conduct surveys
Method has to be verbal
Different languages = need for translator
Increases cost and time
Impacts of practical issues on choice of method - opportunities to conduct research
Gatekeepers may change their mind about access = could curtail research
Could be given access unexpectedly and have no time to select methods or prepare
Patrick (1973) - 🏴 gang
Impact of practical issues on choice of method - personal characteristics of researcher
Gender/religion = discomfort with male researchers
Researcher has to be female
Marginialised or deviant groups = suspicion of researcher
May need to be part of the same community as the participant, or share similar experiences
Shared identity can foster trust
Background knowledge enhances understanding
Increases comfort of, and therefore information from the participant
Research may need different skills in different situations e.g. build a rapport, mix with new people, observe and recall