1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
RE: founding figures of sociology + emotion
founding figures of social paid some attention to emotions; then emotions were ignored in 2nd + 3rd generations; BUT then sociolgoists have paid more attention since the 1970s *due to major hist events
Collins: aruges that emotions are central to 2 main foci of classical sociological theory—conflict + consensus
key social theorists for conflict + consensus views: 1)Marx on conflict 2)smith + durkheim on consensus
prof’s goal; introduce you to influential sociolgoical theories and to show how emotinality is central to them
soci perspectives of Marx
he was born + raised in genmany
trained philosopher
hard core optimist
tried to apply his ideas—critical sociologist
spent much of life in exile
colloborated with Engels—Engels as very influential in developing Marxist social theory
sociologist or ideologue?
Marx is one of the best-known figures in all world history; right up there with Napoleon, Jesus + Einstein
Marx was one of the 1st sociologists + enournously influential founding figure
marx created an ideology; this ideaology inspired ppl around the world + wht made him so famous/influential
Prof: disentangling his ideology from his social theory—focusing on social theory (*in this class)
dialectical (historical) materialism
marxist theory is complicated + there are diff interpretations of marxist theory
bc Marx/engels said diff things at diff times
at its core marxist theory as dialectical + materialism → dialectical materialsm
1)dialectic (Marx) — 4
dialectic: an understanding/perspective/belief of how works
borrowed concept from Hegel; present in Buddhist, Greek + Hinduism philosphy
suggest there are opposing forces; these forces interaction; this interaction create a new force
— this is the thesis, antithesis + synthesis
sees hist as the continuous unfolding of dialectical processes
marx; conflict perspective
marxism sees the dialectic as the basis of conflict btwn forces & their antithetical counterparts
suggests conflict is an extremely influential social foce — that sociolgists need to focus on it
dialectic is less conflictual + more unifying in Buddhism/Hinduism view of conflict (compare to marx’s view of conflict)
2)materialism (Marx) —
materialism: economic production is basis of social relations
economy determines all other sodiao relations (politics, family, religion, etc.)
individual: suggest that material aspects of our lives affect our norms, interests, how er perceive the world
if you want to understand s/o look at the economy they participate in + their position in it
dialectical materialism as theory of social change
marx combined the dialectic + materialsm to come up with elegant theory of social change
claims that economy is the source of dialectical conflict that drives the evolution of human societies
basic claim; mode of production is the thesis, it’s relations of production produce the antithesis and the resulting conflict produces a new synthesis resulting in a new mode of production
3 pt: forces/means of production, relations of production, mode of production
3 components of dialectical materialism (Marx)
1)forces (means) of production; material technologies used to exploit the environment to make possible “societies”
2)relations of production: relations that govern the forces of production — how ppl interact to produce things using forces of production
3)mode of production: combination of forces and relations