1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What does it say?
“ a well regulated militia, being necessary of a free state, the right of the people to poodle to bear arms shall not be infringed”
Militia has right to bear arms?
U.S vs Cruikshank
White mob not Goverment
Was about a state handgun law(Illinois law)
SAYS: 2ND amendment only applies to federal government and while mob was CONVICTED under STATE LAW
PRESSER VS ILLINOIS
cASE Demostrated that states could regulate milita and private military organizations without violating 2nd amendment, as long as the federal gov power to maintain a national defense was not undermined
Us vs Miller
Ammendment must be interpreted as a protection of the people to form an effective militia NOT to individual to have a gun
DC vs HELLER
“RIGHt to own a gun for self defense is a fundamental right under the 2nd amendment”
McDonald vs Chicago
Opposite of Cruisshank
Change applied the 2nd amendment to bear arms to the 14 amendments to the states
ONCE is a fundamental right state can’t take it away