1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
simple experiments
one iv with two levels
reasons to add levels
test boundary conditions(where an effect stops), identify curvilinear relationships (low/med/high) test multiple treatments (control, CBT, DBT)
costs
lower stastical power (more type II errors), requires larger sample size and more resources
adding variables
experiments with two or more IVs, can include participant variables (measured like age and gender)
why add variables
test boundary conditions (generlaizialbilty, moderators) test theories (whether an effect changes under specific IV combinations)
milgram
obedience difers by lab coat and culture
costs
lower power - more type two errors, larger sample, more complex more resources
basic design
independent groups (between subjects), within groups (repeated measures) matched groups
factorial design structures
2×2 between groups ANOVA, 2×2 within groups ANOVA, 2×2 mixed ANOVA (one IV between, one within)
between groups 2×2
both IVs are between groups, IV1 - movie type (happy/sad) IV2 = social context (alone/group)
within groups 2×2
all particpants’s experince all 4 conditons
mixed 2×2
one iv is within groups the other between groups
main effect
the overall effect of one IV averaging, across levels of the other IV
interaction
the effect of one IV depends on the level of another IV, if simple effect differ - interaction, if simple effect match - no interaction
more complex factorial designs
affng more variables 2×2×2 = 8 conditions, adding more levels 2×2×4 = 16 conditions