Lecture 2 - The Self

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/55

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

56 Terms

1
New cards

What are the 4 concepts of the self?

  1. Self-concept (who am i)

  2. Self-esteem (my sense of self-worth)

  3. Self-knowledge (how i explain myself)

  4. Social-self (my roles in society)

2
New cards

Define self-schema.

An organised framework that helps people process and organise information that is relevant to themselves.

3
New cards

What is an example of social comparison having positive and negative effects on us?

Lockwood and Kunda (1997)

First year students and fourth year students were given a bio of this ‘superstar student’ in fourth year.

  • First year students who read the bio became motivated to be like her and therefore felt really good about themselves after reading the bio.

  • Fourth year students who read the bio felt horrible after reading the bio because they felt that they lacked time and that such a goal was unattainable for them. Hence, compared to the first years, their self-esteem was much lower after reading the bio.

  • For the first and fourth years who did not read the bio, their self-esteems were quite similar.

This indicates that the relation one has to a figure of social comparison can impact the way they are affected by it.

<p><strong>Lockwood and Kunda (1997)</strong></p><p></p><p>First year students and fourth year students were given a bio of this ‘superstar student’ in fourth year. </p><ul><li><p>First year students who read the bio became motivated to be like her and therefore felt really good about themselves after reading the bio. </p></li><li><p>Fourth year students who read the bio felt horrible after reading the bio because they felt that they lacked time and that such a goal was unattainable for them. Hence, compared to the first years, their self-esteem was much lower after reading the bio.</p></li><li><p>For the first and fourth years who did not read the bio, their self-esteems were quite similar. </p></li></ul><p></p><p>This indicates that the relation one has to a figure of social comparison can impact the way they are affected by it. </p>
4
New cards

How does social media affect us?

It creates a lot of opportunities for unrealistic social comparisons as social media usually only shows the best and most exciting parts of one’s life.

Hence, we may often feel worse after looking at social media.

5
New cards

Define the spotlight effect.

The idea of always seeing ourselves as the main character.

6
New cards

Define the illusion of transparency.

When we overestimate how much other people can see our emotions and thoughts.

7
New cards

What is an example of the illusion of transparency?

Savitsky and Gilovich (2003)

They made their participants do a presentation in front of some observers. Afterwards, each participant and observer were to rate the speaker’s presentation.

There were 2 groups; the reassured condition that was given reassurance before the presentation that they’ll do great, and the informed condition which was told about the illusion of transparency.

The speakers part of the reassured condition ranked their presentation significantly lower than those in the informed condition. Moreover, the observers ratings of the speakers presentations were significantly lower for the reassured condition vs. the informed condition.

This suggests that knowing about the illusion of transparency ‘diluted’ its power and made the speakers feel more confident about themselves, which became obvious to the observers.

<p><strong>Savitsky and Gilovich (2003)</strong></p><p></p><p>They made their participants do a presentation in front of some observers. Afterwards, each participant and observer were to rate the speaker’s presentation. </p><p></p><p>There were 2 groups; the reassured condition that was given reassurance before the presentation that they’ll do great, and the informed condition which was told about the illusion of transparency. </p><p></p><p>The speakers part of the reassured condition ranked their presentation significantly lower than those in the informed condition. Moreover, the observers ratings of the speakers presentations were significantly lower for the reassured condition vs. the informed condition. </p><p></p><p>This suggests that knowing about the illusion of transparency ‘diluted’ its power and made the speakers feel more confident about themselves, which became obvious to the observers. </p>
8
New cards

What did Hofstede do?

He developed a framework called ‘Cultural Dimensions’ to describe how national cultures differ across various aspects of society, particularly in the workplace.

9
New cards

Explain cultural dimensions.

The 6 dimensions are:

  1. Power Distance (the extent to which society accepts unequal power distributions)

  2. Individualism vs. Collectivism (the degree of individual vs. group orientation)

  3. Masculinity vs. Femininity (emphasis on assertiveness vs. nurturing values)

  4. Uncertainty Avoidance (a trait that measures a group's tolerance for unpredictable situations)

  5. Long-Term vs. Short-Term Orientation (Long-term orientation values long-term gains and is willing to give up short-term comforts. But, short-term orientation focuses on tradition and achieving immediate gratification.)

  6. Indulgence vs. Restraint (enjoyment of life vs. societal control)

10
New cards

Explain individualism in more depth.

It’s about yourself and what’s best for you. Hence, your self-worth is derived by your own works, not by that of others.

11
New cards

Explain collectivism in more depth. How does it compare to individualism?

It is about your relationships with others where your self-worth can be boosted by your relationships with others.

12
New cards

Describe an example of culture and cognition being intertwined.

Masuda and Nisbett (2001)

When given an image, east asian people described the environment and the relationships among the fish. Like there’s seaweed and a big and small fish.

However, Americans tended to focus on the fact that there’s a big fish and that’s the leader.

This highlights how culture can affect the way we perceive certain situations, our cognition of the world.

<p><strong>Masuda and Nisbett (2001)</strong></p><p></p><p>When given an image, east asian people described the environment and the relationships among the fish. Like there’s seaweed and a big and small fish. </p><p></p><p>However, Americans tended to focus on the fact that there’s a big fish and that’s the leader. </p><p></p><p>This highlights how culture can affect the way we perceive certain situations, our cognition of the world. </p>
13
New cards

What was the Kim and Markus example about? What did they conclude?

When asked which pencil they would choose, people from asian cultures said they’d pick the green pencil, to blend in. However, American’s picked the orange pencil in order to stand out.

Again, this example was about the affect of our culture on our cognition. Suggesting that asians have more collectivists pov and Americans have more individualistic pov’s.

<p>When asked which pencil they would choose, people from asian cultures said they’d pick the green pencil, to blend in. However, American’s picked the orange pencil in order to stand out. </p><p></p><p>Again, this example was about the affect of our culture on our cognition. Suggesting that asians have more collectivists pov and Americans have more individualistic pov’s. </p>
14
New cards

Compare and contrast individualism and collectivism.

knowt flashcard image
15
New cards

Define planning fallacy.

When we underestimate how long a task is going to take.

16
New cards

Define affective forecasting.

Predicting our own feelings.

17
New cards

Define impact bias.

When we overestimate the enduring impacts of an emotion causing effect.

(ie. overestimating how bad you will feel when you leave home to go to college)

18
New cards

Explain what an implicit attitude is.

An automatic response that develops slowly and is drawn from our past experiences.

This type of attitude is hard to stop because it is deeply rooted from our past.

19
New cards

Explain what an explicit attitude is.

An attitude that is consciously controlled and may change with education/persuasion.

20
New cards

Define self-esteem.

An individuals overall sense of self-worth.

21
New cards

What is low self-esteem associated with?

  1. anxiety

  2. loneliness

  3. eating disorders

22
New cards

Can you have too much self-esteem? What is it called?

YES!

It is called Narcissism.

23
New cards

Define narcissism.

Thinking way too highly of oneself to the point that they think they are superior to everyone.

24
New cards

Explain Bushman’s graph.

knowt flashcard image
25
New cards

Define self-efficacy.

Believing in one’s own competence (ie. they think if they work hard they can achieve their goals — high grit and perseverance).

26
New cards

What’s the difference between self-esteem and self-efficacy.

Self-esteem is about your sense of worth and value, while self-efficacy is a specific belief in your ability to successfully perform tasks/actions in particular situations.

Think of it this way: self-esteem is a broader "I like and value myself as a person," whereas self-efficacy is a specific "I believe I can do this particular thing". 

27
New cards

Define self-serving bias.

The tendency to attribute personal failure to external forces, but personal success to internal forces.

28
New cards

Define self-serving attributions.

The tendency to attribute positive outcomes to yourself and negative outcomes to other factors.

29
New cards

What are the 4 different characteristics of attributions?

They are:

  1. internal

  2. external

  3. stable

  4. temporary

30
New cards

How do most people consider themselves?

Most people consider themselves better than average.

31
New cards

What is the rating people give themselves contingent on at times?

The subjectivity of the topic. Usually, the more subjective the topic, the more highly one will rate themself because it’s not as easily refuted.

ie. I am healthier than most people (but what does healthy mean in your definition?)

32
New cards

Define unrealistic optimism (aka. illusory optimism).

When someone is unrealistically optimistic because they have a pessimistic view on others future.

33
New cards

What’s an example of unrealistic optimism?

When Lucy graduates from UofT she thinks that she will find a job within 1 day of searching because she thinks she did so many things that her peers didn’t.

Therefore, her optimism is fueled by a pessimistic outlook on others.

34
New cards

Define defensive optimism.

A coping strategy where an anxious individual sets unrealistically low expectations for a situation, even when they have a history of success.

35
New cards

Is it good to have a balance of illusory and defensive optimism? Why?

Yes!

Because a bit of both keeps you motivated but also prepared in case things don’t go exactly in your favour.

36
New cards

Define the false consensus effect.

Overestimating the commonality of one’s opinions and one’s undesirable/unsuccessful behaviours.

ie. ‘everyone’ sleeps around so it’s fine

37
New cards

Define the false uniqueness effect.

Underestimating the commonality of one’s abilities and one’s desirable/successful behaviours.

38
New cards

Define self-presentation. 

The desired image we want to present to our external audience and internal audience (ie. ourselves). 

39
New cards

Why do we want to present our desired image to an internal audience?

Because we want the image we have of ourselves to match what our external audience sees.

40
New cards

Does our desired image of ourselves change according to who we are with and what situation we’re in?

Yes!

41
New cards

Define self-handicapping.

Partaking in certain behaviours to protect one’s self-image so that those behaviours can be used as an excuse for later failure.

42
New cards

Is self-handicapping a conscious decision or not?

It is an unconscious decision. 

43
New cards

What is an example of self-handicapping?

  • when someone has a self-image that they are a good student

  • the night before an exam they go out partying because they know they aren’t ready for the test and want to be able to blame their bad grade on something other than themselves

  • this is because they don’t want to ruin the image of being a good student in their head

  • hence, when the person does not do well on the test, they attribute it to the fact that they got ‘dragged’ to go to a party rather than face the fact that they might not be such a good student (ie. ruin their self-image)

44
New cards

What umbrella term in self-presentation under?

Impression management.

45
New cards

Define self-monitoring.

Being attuned to the way one presents themselves in social situations and adjusting their behaviour to create a desired impression.

46
New cards

What is self-presentation theory?

The theory suggest that we are eager to present ourselves in a way that makes a good impression.

47
New cards

What are the possible implications of self-presentation theory?

Because of this pressure to impress, people can become paralysed with self-doubt and social anxiety. 

Therefore, possibly leading them to over-personalise situations. 

48
New cards

Who usually over-personalise’s situations?

Those who are shy, anxious or self-conscious.

49
New cards

Explain what over-personalising a situation means.

When people see incidental events as relevant to themselves.

50
New cards

What can over-personalising situations lead to?

  1. stress 

  2. anxiety 

  3. paranoia 

51
New cards

What’s an example of overpersonalising a situation?

Your boss walks past you a couple times while she tasked you to fold t-shirts. Due to this, you begin to think she’s monitoring you and disapproving of how you work, leading you to stress and paranoia. However, in reality, she was just called a couple times in the back to sort inventory.

52
New cards

Other than this pressure to impress, what other factor plays into us over-personalising situations? Why?

Spotlight effect

This is because by overestimating the extent to which people are watching them, people feel like incidental effects are relevant to them—which is over-personalising the situation.

53
New cards

Define learned helplessness.

Occurs when an individual feels like they have no control over negative events and therefore become passive (ie. they don’t try and prevent the neg. outcome — they just leave it).

<p>Occurs when an individual feels like they have no control over negative events and therefore become passive (ie. they don’t try and prevent the neg. outcome — they just leave it). </p>
54
New cards

What is the underlying root of learned helplessness?

Not believing in one’s own competence (abilities).

*low self-efficacy

55
New cards

Define self-efficacy.

A belief in one’s competence.

56
New cards

What are the cons of too much freedom and self-determination (ie. opposite of learned helplessness)? Explain. 

It could result in decreased life satisfaction, depression and regret.

This is because when we have too many options it is easy for us to look back and wonder “what if I picked that instead?” This feeling of being unsure in the choice you made can be really difficult to manage, possibly leading to the above cons.