Topic 7 - Inferential Stats Pt.2

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/34

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

35 Terms

1
New cards

what are inferential statistics

procedures for deciding whether sample data represent a particular relationship in the population 

2
New cards

parametric statistics

inferential procedures that require certain assumptions about the raw score population represented by the sample; used when we compute the mean

3
New cards

nonparametric statistics

inferential procedures that do not require stringent assumptions about the raw score population represented by the sample; used with the median and mode 

4
New cards

experimental hypotheses 

two statements describing the predicted relationship that may or may not be demonstrated by a study 

5
New cards

predicted relationship

manipulating the independent variable will have the expected influence on dependent scores

6
New cards

what is the second hypothesis for?

state that we will NOT demonstrate the predicted relationship in the population

7
New cards

a two-tailed test

used when we do not predict the direction in which dependent scores will change

8
New cards

a one tailed test 

when we do predict the direction in which dependent scores will change 

9
New cards

statistical hypothesis

statements that describe the population parameters the sample stats represent if the predicted relationship exists or does not exist

  • alternative hypothesis

  • null hypothesis

10
New cards

Alternative hypothesis (H(a)) 

the hypothesis describing the population parameters the sample data represent if the predicted relationship does exist in nature 

11
New cards

null hypothesis (H(0))

The hypothesis describing the population parameters the sample data represent if the predicted relationship does not exist in nature

12
New cards

statistical hypothesis testing

a method of statistical inference used to decide whether the data provide sufficient evidence to reject a particular hypothesis 

13
New cards

what are the four assumptions of the z-test

  1. we have randomly selected one sample

  2. the dependent variable is at least approx. normally distributed in the population and involves an interval or ratio scale

  3. we know the mean of the population of raw scores under another condition of the independent variable

  4. we know the true standard deviation of the population described by the null hypothesis

14
New cards

alpha α<.05

the greek letter that symbolizes the criterion probability

the risk of committing a type 1 error

anything less than alpha we count as rare event that rejects the null hypothesis 

15
New cards

what is a z-test

the parametric procedure used in a single sample experiment when the standard deviation of the raw score population is known

16
New cards

region of rejection

located in each tail of the distribution, marked by the critical values of +- 1.96

17
New cards

significant

describes results that are unlikely to result from sampling error when the predicted relationship does not exist; it indicates rejection of the null hypothesis

18
New cards

nonsignificant 

describes results that are likely to result from sampling error when the predicted relationship does not exist; it indicates failure to reject the null hypothesis 

19
New cards

what is the risk to using one-tailed tests

it is only significant if it lies beyond z AND has the same sign

20
New cards

when to use a one-tailed test example

For example, if testing whether a new drug is more effective than an existing one, the hypothesis would focus only on improvement.

  • This test allocates the entire significance level (e.g., 5%) to one tail, providing more power to detect an effect in the specified direction.

  • However, it disregards the possibility of an effect in the opposite direction, which can be a limitation in certain scenarios.

21
New cards

when to use a two-tailed test example

For instance, testing whether a new policy affects farmers' loans could consider both increases and decreases.

  • This test is more conservative, as it accounts for effects in both directions, dividing the significance level (e.g., 2.5% in each tail).

  • It is suitable when the direction of the effect is unknown or when both directions are of interest.

22
New cards

type 1 error

rejecting H(0) when H(0) is true

23
New cards

type 2 error

retaining H(0) when H(0) is really false

24
New cards

power

the probability that we will reject H(0) when it is false

and correctly conclude that the sample data represent a real relationship

  • i.e. the probability of NOT making a type 2 error

25
New cards

random sampling

selects a sample from a population such that each individual has an equal and independent chance of being selected 

26
New cards

sampling error

reflects that fact that the statistics of randomly drawn samples will deviate from the corresponding population parameters

27
New cards

random sampling variability

reflects the fact that owing to chance two random samples drawn from the same population will have diff stats

28
New cards

what is step one of null hypothesis significance testing

start with statistical null model

29
New cards

what is step two of null hypothesis significance testing

identify an appropriate sampling distribution of our null model 

30
New cards

what is step three of null hypothesis significance testing

calculate probabilities of observing samples of data under the null

31
New cards

what is step four of null hypothesis significance testing

collect random sample data from the population

32
New cards

what is step five of null hypothesis significance testing

the rare event rule a<.05

33
New cards

what is the rare event rule 

when the probability of an event occurring is low but it happens anyway

34
New cards

P-values

the probability of observing data as extreme or more extreme than what we actually observed- if the null hypothesis were true

quantified how rare our observed result would be if the null hypothesis were true

35
New cards

what are the 5 steps of hypothesis testing

  1. state the hypothesis (null and alternative)

  2. define the comparison

  3. set the decision criterion - what counts as a rare event

  4. compute the test statistic

  5. make a decision