1/16
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
ad hominem
attack the person, not the argument
argument from authority
believe something is true based on association with someone or something who is not a true expert
appeal to ignorance
argue you conclusion because there is no evidence against it
hasty generalization
come to conclusion based on insufficient evidence
false dichotomy
presents only two options when there are actually more possibilities
faulty causality
mistake correlation with causation
slippery slope
suggest unrealistically dire consequences from a minor cause
straw man
simplify opponent argument in order to make it easier to attack
scare tactics
rely on unreasonable sense of fear or threat to persuade an audience
bandwagon
you should go along with something because everyone else is doing it
equivocation
lying by omission
fult analogy
suggest two things are very similar when they really are not
begging the question
conclusion is assumed in one of the premises, circular reasoning
non sequitur
conclusion does not follow from the premises, evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion
sentimental appeals
emotion drives the argument in a misleading was, lacks tangible evidence
dogmatism
one’s opinion is beyond question and should not be attacked
red herring
avoids the key issue by pointing out other arguments rather than adressing the issu