1. coding, capacity and duration of the memory

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/30

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

31 Terms

1
New cards

Aim of Jacobs’ study?

To investigate the capacity of short-term memory.

2
New cards

How did Jacobs test STM capacity?

Participants were given sequences of digits or letters which increased in length and were asked to recall them in the correct order, immediately

3
New cards

What did Jacobs find?

The mean STM span was:

  • 9.3 digits

  • 7.3 letters

4
New cards

What did Jacobs conclude about STM capacity?

STM has a limited capacity, and capacity is greater for digits than letters.

5
New cards

One strength of Jacobs’ study

it was a highly controlled laboratory experiment, increasing reliability.

6
New cards

One limitation of Jacobs’ study

Recalling digits and letters is artificial, lacks mundane realism, can’t be generalised

7
New cards

Aim of Miller’s study?

To investigate the capacity of short-term memory.

8
New cards

What is chunking? (Millers)

Organising information into meaningful units to increase STM capacity (grouping information together)

9
New cards

What did Jacob’s and Millers conclude?

STM can hold about 7 ± 2 items and can be increased by chunking

10
New cards

How does chunking increase STM capacity?

Each chunk counts as one item, allowing more information to be stored.

11
New cards

What is the capacity of LTM?

Unlimited

12
New cards

What was the aim of Peterson & Peterson’s study?

To investigate the duration of short-term memory without rehearsal.

13
New cards

How did Peterson & Peterson test STM duration?

Participants were given consonant trigrams (YCG) and asked to count backwards in threes to prevent mental rehearsal before recalling the trigram. Were told to stop after varying period of time:3,6,9,12,15,18.

14
New cards

What did Peterson & Peterson find?

-Recall after 3 sec was 80% accurate

-Recall after 18 sec was 3% accurate

15
New cards

What did Peterson & Peterson conclude?

STM has a very limited duration unless rehearsal takes place

16
New cards

One strength of Peterson & Peterson’s study

Highly controlled (extraneous variables) laboratory experiment, increasing internal validity(nonsense triagrams, counting backwards)

17
New cards

One limitation of Peterson & Peterson’s study

The task is artificial, lacks mundane realism, low external validity (not info that people normally try to remember, such as phone number)

18
New cards

What was the aim of Bahrick et al.’s study?

To investigate the duration of long-term memory.

19
New cards

How did Bahrick et al. test LTM duration?

Participants aged 17–74 were asked to recall former classmates using free recall (recall names from their class with no prompt) and photo recognition (pick names that match photos)

20
New cards

What did Bahrick et al. find?

<p></p>
21
New cards

What did Bahrick et al. conclude?

LTM can last a lifetime, unlimited

22
New cards

Strengths of Bahrick et al.’s study

  • Used real life memories (people’s names and faces)- high external validity

  • Recalling former classmates is a real-life task, so the study has high mundane realism.

  • The study used a large sample aged 17–74, meaning the findings can be generalised to a wide population, higher populations validity

23
New cards

Limitation of Bahrick et al.’s study

  • Participants may have rehearsed the information over time, reducing internal validity

  • Participants were mainly American high-school graduates, so the findings may not fully generalise to other cultures or education systems.

24
New cards

What was the aim of Baddeley’s study?

To investigate how information is coded in STM and LTM

25
New cards

What is Baddeleys procedure

→ Participants were given four word lists:

  • Acoustically similar (sound)

  • Acoustically dissimilar

  • Semantically similar (meaning)

  • Semantically dissimilar
    They recalled the lists immediately (STM) or after a delay (LTM).

26
New cards

What did Baddeley find about coding in STM?

Participants made more errors with acoustically similar words, showing STM is mainly acoustically coded.

27
New cards

What did Baddeley find about coding in LTM?

Participants made more errors with semantically similar words, showing LTM is mainly semantically coded.

28
New cards

What did Baddeley conclude?

STM and LTM use different types of coding, supporting the idea of separate memory stores.

29
New cards

Strengths of Baddeley study

  • Standardised procedure was used, making the study easy to replicate and increasing reliability

  • Theoretical value, research paved the way for the MSM, showing that STM and LTM are 2 separate stores

30
New cards

One Weakness of Baddeley study

Recalling word lists is artificial, giving the study low mundane realism (don’t reflect the type of meaningful information people typically try to remember, such as names, directions) therefore, can’t be generalised outside of the lab

31
New cards