Nuisance cases

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 18

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

19 Terms

1
Hunter v Canary Wharf
Claimant must have a legal interest in the land
New cards
2
Malone v Laskey
C injured by vibrations caused by neighbour. No interest in land as licensee (to live there) and wife of tenant. C must have an interest in the land (own or rent) to sue in private nuisance.
New cards
3
Khorasandijan v Bush
C recieved harrassing phonecalls from D
New cards
4
Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan
Occupier knew of and ignored pipes until they burst. An occupier may be liable for the acts of a trespasser if they adopt or continue the nuisance.
New cards
5
Halsey v Esso Petroleum
Trucks driving past became unlawful as factory in residential area and began to interfere with residents sleep. Industrial activities are more likely to be a nuisance in a residential area. Locality of interference.
New cards
6
Tetley v Chitty
Noisy go kart club - Council could be liable as they were causing the nuisance
New cards
7
Wheeler v JJ Saunders
Planning permission does not authorise a nuisance. smell of farm. loss of amenity
New cards
8
Kennaway v Thompson
Entitled to a limited injunction restraining the club from carrying on those activities which caused the nuisance. (loss of amenity)
New cards
9
Sturges v Bridgman
Doctor started a practice next to a confectionary
New cards
10
st hellens smelting v tipping
copper smelting company damaged claimants crops
New cards
11
murdock v glacier metal
excess noise from factory
New cards
12
Bridlington Relay v Yorkshire Electricity Board
electrical interference with TV signals caused by the activities of the defendant Electricity Board. did not constitute a legal nuisance
New cards
13
McKinnon v Walker
Fumes from the defendant's factory damaged the claimant's abnormally sensitive orchids. HELD: The claim was successful as there was also general damage to items that were not abnormally senstive. sensititivity
New cards
14
Dennis v MOD
Planes causing noise disturbance. held that planes were necessary for protection of country. social utility.
New cards
15
Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett
D's lawful act of firing his shotgun became an unlawful act as he was aware the neighbour's fox would miscarry. Malice
New cards
16
Christie v Davey
noise disturbance in retaliation to piano lessons. malice
New cards
17
Allen v Gulf Oil
The claimant brought an action in nuisance for the smell
New cards
18
Miller v Jackson
Cricket
New cards
19
Leakley v National Trust
liable for landslide as did not take precaution for foreseeable harm.
New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 1 person
62 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 8 people
749 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 4 people
837 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 517 people
167 days ago
4.5(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 55 people
707 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 17 people
938 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 2466 people
702 days ago
5.0(7)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (78)
studied byStudied by 23 people
292 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (21)
studied byStudied by 210 people
679 days ago
5.0(4)
flashcards Flashcard (81)
studied byStudied by 78 people
550 days ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (34)
studied byStudied by 58 people
562 days ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (33)
studied byStudied by 13 people
839 days ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (104)
studied byStudied by 8 people
33 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (51)
studied byStudied by 21 people
847 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (70)
studied byStudied by 248 people
44 days ago
5.0(1)
robot