1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Key argument 1 - Yes
Representation of minority groups and women have increased dramatically and continues to - 29.2% of women in Congress; 66 Black Congress members; Sarah McBride as the first transgender congresswomen
Key argument 2 - Yes
Caucuses allow under-represented groups to act together and increase their influence - outsiders such as Obama got in through primaries
Key argument 3 - Yes
Earmarking allows for decisions on a local level to be delivered
Key argument 4 - Yes
Interest groups and lobbyists broaden represent - National Association of the Advancement of Coloured People, BLM
Key argument 5 - Yes
The two parties represent an increasingly partisan environment and reflect the US partisan population
Key argument 1 - No
Representation doesn’t match the population - women make-up half the population; Hispanic representation doesn’t match the USA population
Key argument 2 - No
Function is compromised by financial advantages of incumbents over challengers in congressional elections
Key argument 3 - No
Gerrymandering can dramatically alter the outcome of the House by splitting up minority districts
Key argument 4 - No
Lobbyists from Interest Groups can influence members more than the constituents
Key argument 5 - No
The lack of this parties and independents means that Congress doesn’t truly reflect the political leanings of the US