* Cost = C * Revenue = B + C * Surplus = Revenue - Cost = B
18
New cards
consumers surplus graphed
* area under the demand curve and above equilibrium prices * (1/2) height x base
19
New cards
producers surplus graphed
* area under the equilibrum price line and above the supply curve * (1/2) height x base
20
New cards
the cavet
* economic efficiency is only achieved if the owner of a resource has a well-defined property rights
21
New cards
3 property rights
1. exclusivity: all benefits using the resource go to the owner only → all money goes to owner 2. transferability: property right is transferable → can buy / sell portions 3. enforceability: property right is secure from invoking seizure or encroachment → people can’t just buy whatever
22
New cards
public goods
* parks, rivers, air quality don’t meet the property rights criteria
23
New cards
economic surplus only occurs when
the sum of CS and PS when markets are perfect and property rights are well defined
24
New cards
non-rivalry public goods
* goods/services that can be consumed by many without diminishing the value to anyone
25
New cards
private goods
* market price is the efficient mechanism
26
New cards
public goods market price
* is not efficient because consumers want to pay the lowest price possible or free ride ( non - excludability ) * causes market failure
27
New cards
common pool resources
* goods that are non-excludable and rival * have no real price or property rights = over use
28
New cards
externality
* welfare of some agent depends on their own activities and activities of another
29
New cards
positive externality
* positive external benefits
30
New cards
negative externality
* negative external cost
31
New cards
what is market failure?
* unable to allocate resources efficiently * price of marginal cost no longer successful
32
New cards
deadweight loss
* welfare lost bc the beneficial amount of activity did not occur
33
New cards
potential solutions to market failure / deadweight lost
* regulations * tax * legal system * private negotiation * information
34
New cards
coase theorem
* key issue is ID who has property rights * doesn’t matter who gets property rights as long as negotiating costs are negligible and affected parties can negotiate freely
\
35
New cards
2 key things with coase theorem
1. transactions are negligible 2. Number of affected parties is small
* COST ARE NEGLIGIBLE AND CAN NEGOTIATE FREELY
36
New cards
how to identify what’s best:
* assess the desirability of policy before putting it into place * if it is already in place → evaluate how the program has worked in practice
37
New cards
benefit-cost analysis is helpful in evaluating these trade offs
* assessing pre-defined options * finding the optimal outcome
38
New cards
support the policy if:
* B>C * B/C > 1
39
New cards
benefits on a graph
* area under the demand curve * total benefits = rectangle + triangle under the demand curve
40
New cards
costs on graph
* total cost: area under the marginal cost (MC) curve
41
New cards
net benefit:
* benefit - cost = area below the demand curve and above the marginal cost curve * (1/2) x b x h
42
New cards
opportunity cost
* the value of the next best alternative * or the forgone value that would have resulted from an alternative use of the resource * what would have been paid instead = the opportunity cost
43
New cards
First Equimarginal Principle (Efficiency Equimarginal Principle):
* social net benefits are maximized when the social marginal benefits from an allocation equal the social marginal costs
\
44
New cards
social marginal benefit:
* the increase in social benefits received from supplying one more unit of the good or service
45
New cards
social marginal cost:
* the increase in social cost incurred from supplying one more of the good or service
46
New cards
expected benefits:
* ( percent x benefit ) + ( percent x benefit )
47
New cards
net present values
* the present value of benefits/costs that will occur in the future * process of calculating present value is called **discounting**
48
New cards
discount rate
* the rate of interest used to convert (discount) the future value into present value * = r
49
New cards
present value equation
* Pv = NB / (1 +r)^t
50
New cards
present value steps
1. calculate the net benefits for each year ( benefits - cost) 2. use the discount rates to calculate the present value from the project 3. sum the present values to calculate net present values for the project
51
New cards
NPV decreases rapidly with
increasing discount rates
52
New cards
dynamic efficiency
* an allocation of resources across t time periods satisfies the dynamic efficiency criterion **if it maximizes the present value of net benefits**
53
New cards
static efficiency:
* an allocation satisfies the (static) efficiency criterion **if it maximizes economic surplus or net benefits**
54
New cards
if the expected net benefit is positive then
* you should implement the project
55
New cards
risk neutral
* a decision that maximizes expected net benefits * they are indifferent
56
New cards
risk averse
* willing to accept lower payments but with more certainty
57
New cards
risk loving
* willing to accept a risky outcome with higher payments
58
New cards
climate change
* is the long term changes in temperatures and weather patterns
59
New cards
how long have human activities pushed climate change?
* 1800s
60
New cards
how climate change happens
* greenhouse effect: * greenhouse gases emitted by humans wrap the earth’s atmosphere trapping sun’s heat and raising temperatures
61
New cards
direct effects of extreme climate change:
deaths, property, damage, crop damage
62
New cards
less obvious effects:
* negative impacts on human health, nutritional content of foods, disruption of food distribution
63
New cards
who is affected most?
* poor and marginalized farmers * developing countries
64
New cards
what can economics offer?
* market based strategies and regulations * behavioral nudges * climate justice: * polluters pay a premium to the poor and vulnerable populatuions/communities
65
New cards
two common responses to climate change:
* mitigation * adaptation
66
New cards
mitigation:
* reducing flow of greenhouse gases into atmosphere by reducing sources of these gases or enhancing the “sinks” that accumulate and store these gases (oceans ex)
67
New cards
adaptation:
* adapting to the changing climate by adjusting to actual or expected future climate * goal is to reduce our risks from the harmful effects of climate change
68
New cards
social cost of carbon
* the additional economic damage that would accrue from emitting one more ton of CO2 into the atmosphere * the marginal increase in the present value of the economic damages resulting from 1 metric ton increase in CO2 emissions * SSC
69
New cards
SSC ( social cost of carbon )
* is a present value calculation (timing of emission reduction and the discount rate ) * depends on assumptions about discount rates, the size of the population affected, and the magnitude of the damages
70
New cards
estimating SCC ( social carbon cost )
1. predict future emissions based on population , economic growth rates, and other factors 2. model future climate responses 3. assess the economic impact that these climatic changes will have on agriculture, health, energy use, and other aspects 4. convert future damages into their present day value and add them up to determine total damages
71
New cards
Integrated Assessment Model (IAM)
* used to calculate SCC and the benefits of abatement policies * integration of * climate * biophysical * demographic * economic models
72
New cards
what is happening with precipitation?
* global average precipitation is increasing * distribution is uneven * some areas getting dryer
\
73
New cards
Human influence:
* we for SURE influencing
74
New cards
greenhouse gasses
* trap heat in atmosphere
75
New cards
carbon tax
gov sets price and market sets amount
76
New cards
cap and trade
gov sets amount, market determine price
77
New cards
climate change mitigation
two common policies are cap and trade and carbon tax
78
New cards
existence value
WTP to ensure that a resource continues to exist, with no future expectations (no use at all)
79
New cards
which of the following are the two categories WTP estimation methods?
revealed preferences and stated preferences
80
New cards
revealed preference
used when value is directly observable
81
New cards
stated preference
used when value is not directly observable
* contingent valuation * choice experiment
82
New cards
contingent valuation
this approach creates a hypothetical market and ask for respondents to consider a WTP question based on this market
83
New cards
choice experiments
estimating the value of a hypothetical improvement in attributes of a non-market good
84
New cards
hedonic pricing method
revealed preference method of non-market valuation that uses data on external factors to estimate the value of the environment
85
New cards
economic water scarcity
water is available but cant get bc economic issues
86
New cards
an individuals WTP for small changes in mortality risk
value of statistical life
87
New cards
largest users of water
* thermoelectric power * irrigation
88
New cards
most groundwater is
non-renewable resources
89
New cards
most surface water is
renewable
90
New cards
leapfrogging:
new development continues not on the very edge of the current development, but farther out.
91
New cards
marginal user cost
the opportunity cost of consuming another unit of groundwater today
92
New cards
riparian rights = common property
allocate the right to use water to the owners of land abutting a water source
93
New cards
regulated riparian = public property
allocate the right to use water water
94
New cards
dynamic efficiency
allocation maximizes the present value of net benefits
95
New cards
appropriative rights // prior appropriation doctrine
water should be appropriated and applied to a beneficial use in order for someone to get the rights to use it
96
New cards
efficient allocation of groundwater is achieved when
the net present value of groundwater allocation over time is maximized
97
New cards
state of texas uses what methods
* hybrid combo * riparian * appropriative rights
98
New cards
sources of inefficiencies in current water allocation:
* leapfrogging * market power * failure of realize non-use value land * incompatible land use
99
New cards
sustainable yield
the fisheries catch level that equals the growth rate of the fish population
100
New cards
stock pollutants
the environment has little to no absorptive capacity