1/64
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Teratogenic
abnormalities induced by exposure in utero
A high dose of ionizing radiation during pregnancy is just one of the recognized agents that can produce
mental retardation
neurobehavior effects
convulsive disorders
congenital malformations
fetal growth retardation
embryonic death
cancer (primarily leukemia)
Effects fall broadly into the following categories
lethal effects
malformations
growth disturbances without malformations
childhood cancer (high uncertainty)
Effects are determined by
gestational stage
dose
dose rate
Is it easy to distinguish between the incidence of effects caused by a given contaminant exposure and the background incidence?
no
Is there a lot of data on human in-utero exposure?
no (atomic bomb survivors, pelvic x-rays, pelvic radium brachytherapy)
Pre-implantation
Day 0-9, time of fertilization to the time at which the embryo attaches to uterine wall
Organogenesis
Day 10-Week 6, period during which major organs are developed
Fetal period
Week 6-39, growth of structures already formed throughout birth
Who has a longer fetal period: humans or mice?
humans
Does irradiating the pregnant rat’s maternal organs before the fertilized embryo enters the uterus increase the risk for birth defects, pregnancy loss, or fetal growth retardation?
no
When doses were such that pregnant rat exhibit signs of radiation sickness, what occurred?
growth retardation and embryonic death
What is the threshold for congenital malformations and fetal growth retardation?
doses above 0.2 Gy
The pre-implantation stage is most sensitive to
lethal effects
In other animals, pre-implantation effects are expressed as
decreased litter size
Pre-implantation typically results in a
binary response (embryo dies or is unharmed)
Is irradiation at pre-implantation easy to detect?
no
Is growth retardation observed at pre-implantation?
no
For doses to the embryo less than 100 mGy, lethal effects in pre-implantation will be _____ for humans
very infrequent
For doses in the range of 150-200 mGy during the preimplantation, the risk of embryonic loss ______
may increase
Why can organogenesis see developmental abnormalities?
cells are still undergoing differentiation and are sensitive
What is the dose threshold for mice organogenesis effects?
100 mGy
What is the no-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) in humans for early organogenesis?
200 mGy
What causes growth retardation in animals?
~1 Gy x-rays, threshold of 250 mGy
The greatest growth retardation is seen in _____ organogenesis
early
Neonatal death peaks at around ___ of mice receiving 2 Gy on day 10 (which is about day 29 for humans)
70%
In the fetal period, what predominates?
cellular growth
Various systemic effects have been observed in the fetal period, such as
hematopoietic system, liver, kidney, relatively high radiation doses
Exposure in the fetal period can result in
stunted growth
Irradiation in early fetal stage exhibits a greater degree of
permanent growth retardation
Which type of embryo has a better ability to recuperate from growth retardation?
preimplanted and early organogenesis
For the fetal period, it takes a ____ to kill than earlier stages
higher
What are the most likely mechanisms?
Cell death or mitotic delay beyond the recuperative capacity of the embryo or fetus
Inhibition of cell migration, differentiation, and cell communication
Interference with histogenesis by processes such as depletion, necrosis, or scarring
Radiation induced cell death may be minimally important at one stage because
an embryo can replace the killed cells
Cell death may be a primary factor once an embryo has lost the ability to
replace damaged cells (the fetus may be permanently cell-depleted)
Biological plausibility is most likely due to
vascular disruption, amniotic band syndrome, or a placental embolus to the limb
A malfunction like biological plausibility has been mistakenly allged to have resulted from an
in-utero exposure despite there being no indication that radiation exposure had even occurred
A unilateral malformation in a child, who had a normal weight at birth, had normal intelligence, and a normal head circumference could not have resulted from
an exposure to ionizing radiation
What are the principle effects from the atomic bomb survivors?
microcephaly and mental retardation
Microcephaly
head size less than 2 standard deviations below the mean, frequency associated (but not always) with mental retardation, increased occurrence in 0-7th week post-conception irradiated group but none mentally retarded
Radiation-related small head size is related to a generalized
growth retardation (reduced weight and height)
Mental retardation
IQ < 70 and microcephaly
The most vulnerable period for the induction of mental retardation is considered to be from
8th-15th week post-conception
From the 15th-25th week, much higher doses were required to produce _____ and the incidence was lower
mental retardation
What is the threshold for mental retardation?
0.3 Gy
Effects for <2-3 weeks
few severe abnormalities, increased resorption/abortion
Effects for 4-11 weeks
abnormalities in many organs
Effects in 11-16 weeks
eye, skeletal, genital abnormalities; stunted growth, microcephaly, mental retardation
Effects for 16-20 weeks
microcephaly, mental retardation, stunted growth
Effects for >30 weeks
few detected abnormalities
Animal experiments show embryonic death during
pre-implantation
Animal experiments show gross congenital malformations during
organogenesis
Animal experiments show ______, which is temporary during organogenesis and permanent during the fetal period
growth retardation
Japanese A-bomb survivors show ______ from irradiation during much of gestation
microcephaly
Japanese A-bomb survivors show severe
mental retardation
There were reports of an increase in the frequency of medical terminations in Russia following
Chernobyl
Carcinogenic
induction and formation of cancer
Pelvic irradiation
images of maternal pelvis and fetal structures within pelvis to determine method of delivery with lowest risk
Doses to the maternal ovaries and fetus ranged over __ orders of magnitude from obstetrical abdominal x-ray procedures
two
Studies on exposure in utero to x-rays “show”
increased risk of developing childhood cancers (primarily leukemia)
risk greatest during first or third trimester
ionizing radiation is causative
no dose can be regarded as “completely” safe
Although the statistical association from case-control epidemiological studies is not generally debated, investigators have argued about
causality
if the association is causal, the likely magnitude of the leukemogenic risk
The risk of cancer per Gy from case-control and most of the cohort studies of cancer risk in offspring of mothers undergoing diagnostic radiologic procedures are not based on
actual dose reconstructions
Do dose limits apply for medical exposure?
no
Termination of pregnancy at fetal doses of less than 100 mGy is not
justified based on radiation risk
When is termination of a pregnancy justified based on radiation risk?
100-500 mGy