all court cases until unit 3

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 29

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

30 Terms

1

Marbury v Madison (Facts)

William Marbury was appointed as a justice of the peace, but his commission wasn't delivered. He sued the Secretary of State

New cards
2

Marbury v Madison (Precedent)

Established judicial review, allowing the Supreme Court to declare laws unconstitutional

New cards
3

Marbury v Madison (Constitutional Provision)

A3 Judiciary Act of 1789

New cards
4

McCulloch v Maryland (Constitutional Provision)

Necessary and Proper Clause (A1S8) & Supremacy Clause

New cards
5

McCulloch v Maryland (Facts)

Maryland tried to tax the Second Bank of the US. McCulloch, a bank employee, refused to pay the tax

New cards
6

McCulloch v Maryland (Precedent)

Congress has implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause; states can't tax federal institutions

New cards
7

US v Lopez (Constitutional Provision)

Commerce clause (A1S8)

New cards
8

US v Lopez (facts)

Student was charged under the Gun-Free School Zones Act for bringing a gun to school. Argued Congress overstepped its power

New cards
9

US v Lopez (precedent)

Limited Congress's use of the Commerce Clause; law was unconstitutional b/c gun possession in schools did not relate to interstate commerce

New cards
10

McDonald v Chicago (Constitutional Provision)

Second Amendment & Fourteenth Amendment (due process clause)

New cards
11

McDonald v Chicago (Facts)

McDonald sued Chicago over its handgun ban, arguing it violated his 2nd amendment rights

New cards
12

McDonald v Chicago (Precedent)

Incorporated the Second Amendment to the states through the 14th amendment

New cards
13

Schenck v US (Constitutional Provision)

First amendment (free speech)

New cards
14

Schenck v US (Facts)

Schenck handed out anti-draft flyers during WWI and was convicted under the Espionage Act. He claimed this conviction violated his free speech

New cards
15

Schenck v US (Precedent)

Established "clear and present danger" test; speech can be restricted if it poses a significant danger

New cards
16

Tinker v Des Moines (Constitutional Provision)

First amendment- free speech

New cards
17

Tinker v Des Moines (Facts)

Students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War and were suspended. They sued, claiming their free speech was violated

New cards
18

Tinker v Des Moines (Precedent)

Students don't lose their 1st amendment rights in school unless it causes substantial disruption

New cards
19

NY Times v US (Constitutional Provision)

First amendment (freedom of the Press)

New cards
20

NY Times v US (Facts)

Government tried to prevent NYT from publishing the Pentagon Papers, citing national security concerns

New cards
21

NY Times v US (Precedent)

Government couldn't use prior restraint unless there was a direct/immediate threat to national security

New cards
22

Citizens United v. FEC (Constitutional Provision)

First Amendment, free speech

New cards
23

Citizens United v. FEC (Facts)

Citizens United wanted to air a film about Hillary Clinton close to an election, but federal law restricted corporate election spending

New cards
24

Citizens United v. FEC (Precedent)

Struck down restrictions on independent political expenditures by corporations and unions

New cards
25

Baker v Carr (Constitutional Provision)

Fourteenth amendment (Equal Protection Clause)

New cards
26

Baker v Carr (Facts)

Tennessee had not redrawn its legislative districts in decades, leading to unequal representation. Baker sued, saying it was unconstitutional

New cards
27

Baker v Carr (Precedent)

Established principle of "one person, one vote"; decided courts could rule on redistricting cases (previously considered a political issue)

New cards
28

Shaw v Reno (Constitutional Provision)

Fourteenth amendment (Equal Protection Clause) (Race)

New cards
29

Shaw v Reno (Facts)

NC created a racially gerrymandered congressional district to increase Black representation. White voters sued, arguing it was unconstitutional

New cards
30

Shaw v Reno (Precedent)

Racial gerrymandering is unconstitutional if race is the predominant factor in drawing district lines

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 1 person
62 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 8 people
749 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 4 people
837 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 517 people
167 days ago
4.5(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 55 people
707 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 17 people
938 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 2466 people
702 days ago
5.0(7)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (78)
studied byStudied by 23 people
292 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (21)
studied byStudied by 210 people
679 days ago
5.0(4)
flashcards Flashcard (81)
studied byStudied by 78 people
550 days ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (34)
studied byStudied by 58 people
562 days ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (33)
studied byStudied by 13 people
839 days ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (104)
studied byStudied by 8 people
33 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (51)
studied byStudied by 21 people
847 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (70)
studied byStudied by 248 people
44 days ago
5.0(1)
robot