Prosocial behavior

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

25 Terms

1
New cards

Prosocial behavior

behavior intended to benefit another

2
New cards

When do people help?

B = f(PE)

  • personality factors do matter - emotionality, empathy, self-efficacy

  • however situational factors are often more powerful in predicting when people will help

3
New cards

Situational factors and help

Latane and Darley 1970 - the seizure study

  • alone - 85% helped within 1 minute

  • with 1 other - 62% helped within 1 minute

  • with 4 others - 31% helped within 1 minute

4
New cards

Bystander effect

the greater the number of bystanders who witness an emergency, the less likely any one of them will help

5
New cards

Decision tree

  • deciding to help occurs in stages

  • aspects of the situation can inhibit helping at any one of these stages

6
New cards

Stage 1 of decision tree

noticing the event

  • if people don’t notice, they can’t help

  • smoke study, Latane and Darley (1968) - when more people are around, took longer to notice

  • Good Samaritan study (time pressure/distraction) - the situation predicted more than personality

7
New cards

Stage 2 of decision tree

interpreting the event as an emergency

  • ambiguity diminishes helps - ex. fight between man and woman

  • pluralistic ignorance

8
New cards

Pluralistic ignorance

bystanders assume nothing is wrong in an emergency because no one else looks concerned - ex. smoke study (# of bystanders)

  • alone - 50% in 2 minutes, 75% within 6 minutes

  • with others - 12% in 2 minutes, 38% within 6 minutes

9
New cards

Stage 3 of decision tree

assuming responsibility

  • personal responsibility - ex. radio in the park study

  • diffusion of responsibility

10
New cards

Diffusion of responsbility

each bystander’s sense of responsibility decreases as the number of bystanders increases

  • ex. Kitty Genovese

11
New cards

Stage 4 of decision tree

in order to help, we must know what kind of help is needed

  • ex. elderly woman collapsed in the street

12
New cards

Stage 5 of decision tree

deciding to help

  • must be capable - ex. CPR

  • must not be afraid to help - ex. mugging

13
New cards

Summary of deciding to help

there are 5 stages in the decision to help and aspects of the situation can interfere at all 5

14
New cards

How can we increases helping?

  • single out individuals

  • clearly define an event as an emergency - “I need help”

  • educate people about this research - research shows this works

  • make people do volunteer work? - no, be careful of the overjustification effect

15
New cards

Altruism

any act to benefit another person for the sole purpose of benefiting that person - helping regardless of self-interest

16
New cards

Why do people help?

  • mood

  • evolutionary adaptation

  • social exchange

  • empathy

17
New cards

Mood

people are often more helpful when they are in a good mood

  • dime study (Isen and Levin 1972) - 84% helping vs 4% helping

  • why does this effect occur? - good mood makes us think positively, helping sustains a good mood, good mood makes us want to give back to the world

  • evidence = if people are given another way to improve mood, helping decreases

18
New cards

When does mood influence helping?

when people feel that helping will affect their moods

19
New cards

Evolutionary perspective

our psychology and our behaviors have evolved like our physiology

  • so how could prosocial behavior have survived? - kin selection, norm of reciprocity

20
New cards

Social exchange principles

people consider the rewards and costs when deciding whether to help

  • rewards and costs can be internal and external

  • people help when the rewards outweigh the costs

21
New cards

None of these theories suggest…

a true altruism

22
New cards

Empathy altruism model

  • Daniel Batson

  • empathy - the ability to adopt another person’s perspective

  • model states - when people feel empathy, they help regardless of the rewards and costs - when people do not feel empathy, rewards and costs matter

23
New cards

Evidence of empathy-altruism model

radio show experiment

  • when empathy was high, helping did not depend on costs

  • when empathy was low, costs mattered - people helped more when costs of not helping were high

24
New cards

Problem with empathy-altruism model

  • what about feeling distressed about someone else’s distress?

  • when empathy people thought they would listen to a comedy tape, they helped less

25
New cards

Final note on helping

  • is there a “true” altruism - maybe, maybe not

  • but the fact that it makes us feel good to help others is one major difference between humans and other species that explains our success

  • and at the very least, empathy increases that tendency