1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
nature
nativist-generative view (Chomsky)
language is innate and pre-specified
we are born with language acquisition device
language is separate from other cog systems
nurture
constructionist-interactionist view
environment guides language
no processor in brain specific for language
can't separate language from cog systems
limitations of nativist view
Non Literal Language (idioms), strict focus on syntax, no single grammar to account for all languages. No evidence that children need adult-like rules to acquire language
evidence for nature
- Deaf babies babble; speech and language deficits may be inheritable
- Children follow sequence of developmental milestones
- Language aspects learned without direct instruction (e.g., grammar rules)
- We are born with a language acquisition device (LAD) which determines how we learn language
evidence for nurture
operant conditioning (the results of your past behaviors have conditioned you to either repeat or avoid those behaviors)
Cognitive Theory (Piaget)
* Children learn language like other cognitive skills (Concepts first, then language)
* Language is made possible by cognition and other intellectual processes
* Observe child in play to determine level of representational thought
Semantic Theory (Filmore, Bloom)
- interpretation of messages requires consideration of meaning
- acquisition stimulated by child's desire to communicate and knowledge
Behavioral Theory (Skinner)
- children learn language through conditioning (only what they are exposed to)
- stimulus-response drives language acquisition
- drill and practice - reinforcement
Social Interactionism
- encourage social interactions
- desire to communicate and use of language drives acquisition
- incorporate caregivers and multiple environments into learning
Emergentist Theory
- data and pattern driven, child's ability to use cues develops over time
- neurologically based
Critical Period Hypothesis
must have adequate stimuli before "critical age" (5-7 years old) or full language command cannot be achieved
Phonology- shortest optimal/critical period. need exposure to phonology in first years of life to have native accent
early 8 phonemes
m, b, y, n, w, d, p, h
middle 8 phonemes
t, ng, k, g, f, v, ch, j
Late 8 phonemes
sh, s, th, th, r, z, l, zh