AP Language - Glossary of Argument Terms and Fallacies (pg. 140-143 of The Language of Composition)

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/36

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

37 Terms

1
New cards

Ad hominem

Latin for "to the man," this fallacy refers to the specific diversionary tactic of switching the argument from the issue at hand to the character of the other speaker.
Example: If you argue that a park in your community should not be renovated because the person supporting it was arrested during a domestic dispute, then you are guilty of this.

2
New cards

Ad populum (bandwagon appeal)

This fallacy occurs when evidence boils down to "everybody's doing it, so it must be a good thing to do."
Example: You should vote to elect Rachel Johnson--she has a strong lead in the polls!

3
New cards

Appeal to false authority

This fallacy occurs when someone who has no expertise to speak on an issue is cited as an authority.
Example: A TV star is not a medical expert, even though pharmaceutical advertisements often use celebrity endorsements.

4
New cards

Argument

A process of reasoned inquiry; a persuasive discourse resulting in a coherent and considered movement from a claim to a conclusion.

5
New cards

Backing

In the Toulmin model, this consists of further assurances or data without which the assumption lacks authority.

6
New cards

Begging the question

A fallacy in which a claim is based on evidence or support that is in doubt. It "begs" a question whether the support itself is sound.

7
New cards

Circular reasoning

A fallacy in which the writer repeats the claim as a way to provide evidence.
Example: "You can't give me a C; I'm an A student!"

8
New cards

Claim

Also called an assertion or a proposition, it states the argument's main idea or position. A claim differs from a topic or subject in that a claim has to be arguable.

9
New cards

Claim of fact

Statement that asserts that something is true or not true.
Example: The number of suicides and homicides committed by teenagers, most often young men, has exploded in the last three decades.

10
New cards

Claim of policy

Statement that proposes a change.
Example: Yet one solution continued to elude us, and that is ending the ignorance about mental health, and moving it from the margins of care and into the mainstream where it belongs.

11
New cards

Claim of value

Statement that argues that something is good or bad, right or wrong.
Example: There's a plague on all our houses, and since it doesn't announce itself with lumps or spots or protest marches, it has gone unremarked in the quiet suburbs and busy cities where it has been laying waste.

12
New cards

Classical oration

Five-part argument structure used by classical rhetoricians. The five parts are: introduction, narration, confirmation, refutation, and conclusion.

13
New cards

Introduction (exordium)

Introduces the reader to the subject under discussion.

14
New cards

Narration (narratio)

Provides factual information and background material on the subject at hand or establishes why the subject is a problem that needs addressing.

15
New cards

Confirmation (confirmatio)

Usually the major part of the text, it includes the proof needed to make the writer's case.

16
New cards

Refutation (refutatio)

Addresses the counterargument. It is a bridge between the writer's proof and conclusion.

17
New cards

Conclusion (peroratio)

Brings the essay to a satisfying close.

18
New cards

Closed thesis

A statement of the main idea of the argument that also previews the major points the writer intends to make.
Example: The 3D characters, exciting plot, and complex themes of the Harry Potter series make them not only legendary children's books but also enduring literary classics.

19
New cards

Deduction

A logical process whereby one reaches a conclusion by starting with a general principle or universal truth (a major premise) and applying it to a specific case (a minor premise).
Example:
MAJOR PREMISE: Exercise contributes to better health.
MINOR PREMISE: Yoga is a type of exercise.
CONCLUSION: Yoga contributes to better health.

20
New cards

Either/or (false dilemma)

A fallacy in which the speaker presents two extreme options as the only possible choices.
Example: Either we agree to higher taxes, or our grandchildren will be mired in debt.

21
New cards

Faulty analogy

A fallacy that occurs when an analogy compares two things that are not comparable.
Example: Arguing that because we put animals who are in irreversible pain out of their misery, we should do the same for people, asks the reader to ignore significant differences between animals and people.

22
New cards

First-hand evidence

Evidence based on something the writer knows, whether it's from personal experience, observations, or general knowledge of events.

23
New cards

Hasty generalization

A fallacy in which a faulty conclusion is reached because of inadequate evidence.
Example: Smoking isn't bad for you; my great aunt smoked a pack a day and lived to be 90.

24
New cards

Induction

From the Latin inducere, "to lead into"; a logical process whereby the writer reasons from particulars to universals, using specific cases in order to draw a conclusion, which is also called a generalization.
SPECIFIC CASES: Exercise promotes weight loss. Exercise lowers stress levels. Exercise improves mood.
GENERALIZATION: Exercise contributes to better health.

25
New cards

Logical fallacy

Potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses in an argument. They often arise from a failure to make a logical connection between the claim and the evidence used to support it.

26
New cards

Open thesis

Statement that does not list all the points the writer intends to cover in an essay.
Example: The popularity of the Harry Potter series demonstrates that simplicity trumps complexity when it comes to the taste of readers, both young and old.

27
New cards

Post hoc ergo propter hoc

This fallacy is Latin for "after which therefore because of which," meaning that it is incorrect to always claim that something is a cause just because it happened earlier. One may loosely summarize this fallacy by saying that correlation does not imply causation.
Example: We elected Johnson as president and look where it got us: hurricanes, floods, stock market crashes.

28
New cards

Qualifier

In the Toulmin model, the qualifier uses words like "usually, probably, maybe, in most cases, and most likely" to temper the claim, making it less absolute.

29
New cards

Quantitative evidence

Includes things that can be measured, cited, counted, or otherwise represented in numbers.
Examples: statistics, surveys, polls, census information.

30
New cards

Rebuttal

In the Toulmin model, it gives voices to possible objections.

31
New cards

Reservation

In the Toulmin model, it explains the terms and conditions necessitated by the qualifier.

32
New cards

Rogerian arguments

Developed by psychiatrist Carl Rogers, these are based on the assumption that having a full understanding of an opposing position is essential to responding to it persuasively and refuting it in a way that is accommodating rather than alienating.

33
New cards

Second-hand evidence

Evidence that is accessed through research, reading, and investigation.
Examples: factual and historical information, expert opinion, and quantitative data.

34
New cards

Straw man

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker chooses a deliberately poor or oversimplified example in order to ridicule and refute an idea.
Example: Politician X proposes that we put astronauts on Mars in the next four years. Politician Y ridicules this proposal by saying that his opponent is looking for "little green men in outer space."

35
New cards

Syllogism

A logical structure that uses the major premise and minor premise to reach a necessary conclusion.
MAJOR PREMISE: Exercise contributes to better health.
MINOR PREMISE: Yoga is a type of exercise..
CONCLUSION: Yoga contributes to better health.

36
New cards

Toulmin model

An approach to analyzing and constructing arguments created by British philosopher Stephen Toulmin in his book The Uses of Argument (1958).
Template: Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (warrant or assumption), on account of (backing), unless (reservation).
Example: Because it is raining, therefore I should probably take my umbrella, since it will keep me dry on account of its waterproof material, unless, of course, there is a hole in it.

37
New cards

Warrant

In the Toulmin model, it expresses the assumption necessarily shared by the speaker and the audience.