1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Why do clinical psychologist conduct research? What kinds of topics do they study?
Goals and Methods
Goals
Describe
Explain
Predict
Control
General Method
Scientific method
Hypothesis, Design, Data Collection, Analysis, Conclusions, Dissemination
• In Clinical Psych – primary reason for research: to gain knowledge about mental health and psychological functioning
Some sample topics and issues of interest in clinical research studies
Psychopathology/Diagnosis
Defining symptoms and characteristics: What are the relationships/differences between the disorders?
What causes abnormal behavior? How does it progress?
Incidence and prevalence rates – general and within specific populations
How to assess symptoms
Interventions
Do they work? How well? With whom? What interventions work best for which targeted problems?
Efficacy vs Effectiveness
What goes on in therapy? What aspects of therapy impact client outcome? How do they impact client outcome? (aka “Process” research)
• Assessment
Developing and validating instruments and method
Evaluating reliability and utility of existing instruments and methods
Teaching/Training
▫ Studying the education in clinical psych
▫ How to best teach/train; comparing methods and content; how to and when to train in specializations
▫ Methods of effective supervision
• Professional Issues
▫ Examining elements of the profession
▫ E.g., what do clinical psychs do; identifying and managing ethical dilemmas; balance of work life and personal lives; attitudes of clinical psychs toward issues and/or groups
Be able to determine the differences between the following types of research methods -- and when they are most appropriate to use: epidemiological, case studies, surveys, and experimental (both single-subject and group designs
Epidemiological - incidence and prevalence
Case studies - research methods that involve a thorough and detailed examination of a person or situation
Surveys
Experimental -
Group Designs
Cause/Effect
IV/DV
Controls/Comparison
e.g., Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs)
• Single Case Designs
▫ ABAB/reversal/withdrawal
▫ Multiple Baseline
efficacy vs effectiveness - what is each and how are they different?
Efficacy - the success of a particular therapy in a controlled study conducted with clients who were chosen according to a specific criterion of study (internal validity)
Participants are selected from meeting strict diagnostic criteria and can resemble textbook cases
Effectiveness - the success of a therapy in actual clinical settings in which clients’ problems span a wider range and are not necessarily chosen based on rigid diagnostic criteria (external validity)
What is a meta-analysis and why are meta-analyses useful in clinical psychology?
Meta-analysis - the statistical method of combining results of separate studies to create a summary of the findings
cross-sectional studies
longitudinal studies
be familiar with the following terms: incidence, prevalence, independent variable, dependent variable
Incidence - new cases
prevalence - overall rate
Independent variable - the variables in the study that are manipulated by the researcher
dependent variable - the variables that are expected to change as a result of changes to the independent variable
How do we define behavior as “abnormal” in clinical psychology? Discuss the four “D”s.
Abnormal - criteria such as personal distress to the individual, deviance from cultural norms, statistical infrequency, and social functioning.
Historically
Supernatural forces: possession by evil or gods
Natural causes (e.g., imbalance of bodily fluids posed by Hippocrates)
Medical model illness
Szasz: psychosocial model (deviance)
Currently in Mental Health:
4Ds: deviance, distress, dysfunction, dangerousness
What is the DSM-5TR
o how was it developed, why is it important, how is it used in clinical psych, what are some criticisms of it?
Early Diagnostics
Kraeplin: late 1800s/early 1900s (exogenous, endogenous)
US Census Bureau: 1840 “idiocy/insanity”; 1880 - seven categories of mental disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
The system was first introduced in 1952 by the American Psychiatric Association
First DSM: 1952
Revisions: DSM – II, III, III-R, IV, IV-TR
Versions I & II
3 categories (psychoses, neuroses, and character disorders)
Descriptive and theoretical (no empirical)
Versions III through IV-TR
Empirically based
Expanded categories and specific disorders
Multiaxial system introduced
Current Version: DSM-5 TR (2013/2021)
based on empirical data
Includes
changes to diagnostic categories, labels, and criteria for various disorders
Does not include the traditional “multiaxial” system of the previous DSMs
New section: set of conditions warranting further investigation before potential inclusion
Revisions heavily criticized...
DSM-5: The Current Edition—Controversy Surrounding DSM-5
Many “work group” members quit midway
Leaders of mental health organizations boycotted DSM-5
Most vocal critic was Allen Frances
Changes are unsafe and scientifically unsound
Medical illnesses diagnosed as somatic symptom disorder
DSM-5 will mislabel “normal people”, promote diagnostic inflation, and encourage inappropriate medication use
Specific criticism by others
Diagnostic overexpansion
Transparency of the revision process
Membership of the Work Groups (mostly researchers, not clinicians)
Discuss pros and cons of classification/diagnostic systems in clinical psych
Pros
can lead to most effective services
some behavior may be more acceptable b/c of label
facilitates communication
funding is dependent on labels
can spur legislation and special interest groups
Cons
often focuses on negative aspects of person
can facilitate low expectations and self-fulfilling prophecy
may be permanent
doing it well takes lots of time and energy/resources
gives false impression of explanation
what are reliability and validity? Why are they important factors in the assessment process?
Validity - the extent to which a technique measures what it claims to measure
Reliability - the extent to which a technique yields consistently reliable results
The extent to which a technique benefits the clinician and ultimately the client in a meaningful way (clinical utility)
role of empathy, sincerity, and acceptance in clinician-client relationship
rapport
An early way to put clients at ease is small talk
Acknowledge the unique, unusual situation of the clinical interview
Client’s language: visual imagery & touch words
how to effectively use questions in interviewing and assessment process
directive style questions - info, their asking specifically for
nondirective - allows clients to determine the course of the interview
open-ended questions and closed-ended questions
clarification questions - interviewer has accurately understood the client
confrotation
pharaphasing
reflection of feeling
summerizing
Uses and types of interviews - when to use, info to gather, specific tools available for use
intake, mental status, diagnostic interviews
intake interview - determines client needs treatment & where the facility can help or should be referred
Diagnostic interview - the primary purpose is to diagnose the client’s problems
purpose is to produce a diagnosis
DSM
mental status exam - used in medical settings & the primary purpose is to assess the client’s functioning at the time of evaluation
Intake Interview / Clinical History Interview
▫ goal is to determine personal history and current situation
▫ topics usually covered
educational
health/medical/developmental
alcohol/drug
psychological/psychiatric
family/marital/sexual
interpersonal/social relations
Occupational
Military
legal
current problems/concerns (what, when, affects life, anything done yet?
Mental Status Exam
▫ Goal: to determine current level of functioning, particularly cognitively and motorically
▫ Involves interview + observations
▫ helps to identify potential psych disorders and to screen for organic brain disorders
▫ topics covered:
general appearance
motor behavior (fine and gross)
mood and affect
speech and thought process
sensorium (x4 - person, place, time, and situation)
cognitive (basic facts, abstractions)
judgment (what do if...)
memory (serial 7s; digit span)
Diagnostic Interview
▫ goal: to determine occurrence & nonoccurrence of diagnostic features of disorders; outcome is diagnosis or“ label”
▫ more common in recent decades
Diagnostic process: more reliable/valid
Many managed care/insurance companies require a diagnosis for reimbursement
▫ examples (child and adult tools)
Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS); also has Ka iddie version
Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I Disorders (SCID)
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children
listening skills - what are they, how are they used
Paraphrasing, reflecting, summarizing
eye contact - facilitates & communicates listening
body language
vocal qualities - pitch, tone, volume, & fluctuation
verbal tracking - repeating key words or phrase back to client
• Skills involved (based on process research (e.g., Rogers, Strupp)
▫ Listening skills
Paraphrasing, reflecting, summarizing
▫ Action responses
Probing, clarifying, information giving
▫ Silence
▫ Terminology
defining all terms
use client’s terms
use “sensory” equivalents
use of silences - how to use, what they might indicate
how do we define intelligence
aptitude or intelligence, the exact definition has a long been a subject of debate among psychologist & may or may not include the speed of mental processing, sensory capability, imagination, adaptability, capacity to learn through experience, memory, reasoning, or inhibition of instinct
• Verbal comprehension
• Verbal expression
• Perceptual reasoning
• Visual-perceptual processing
• Visuospatial skills
• Visual-motor skills
• Attention
Creativity
Word and idea generation
Divergent thinking
Executive Functioning
Organization and Planning
Inhibitory control
Concept formation
Set shifting.
Memory
Short-term and Long term
Working memory
Visual, Verbal/Auditory, Tactile
history of IQ testing: contributions of Binet, Simon, Spearman, Goddard, Terman
Galton’s “hereditary genius” projects
Testing for individual differences (stats)
Heritability of intelligence
Current issues: heritability, reaction range
Binet and Simon (France)
first IQ test for children
concept of “mental age”
Goddard and Terman (America)
Translated Binet’s work: Stanford Binet (1916)
scoring as mental age/chronological (Intelligence Quotient)
Wechsler (America)
first standardized test for adults
new scoring on the normal curve
IQ – what does that term mean? how is an IQ determined (i.e., ratio vs deviation)?
• Psychometric devices consisting of standardized questions and tasks used
for assessing a person’s potential for purposeful and useful behavior
• Standardized
▫ Refers to specific set of procedures for administering and scoring tests
• Psychometrics
▫ Refers to reliability and validity
How are Cognitive assessments used?
• Screening
• Diagnosis
• Selection and Placement
• Evaluation and research
• Monitoring cognitive effects of disease and dysfunction
heritability and stability of intelligence
For each of the major standardized IQ tests (Stanford Binet, Wechsler series, Kaufman series), know:
who developed/when
description – that is, what aspects of intelligence does it measure?
different versions and normative ages for each
Wechsler Series
intelligence is an aggregate of abilities
Specific factors:
verbal comprehension,
perceptual organization
working memory
processing speed
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-5)
2024
ages 16 thru 90
20 subtests
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-V)
2014
ages 6-0 thru 16-11
16 subtests
Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-IV)
2013
ages 2-6 thru 7yr7mo
Developmental focus on expressive and receptive language
Stanford Binet – Fifth Edition
3-level hierarchy of intelligence
(based on Spearman, Horn-Cattell-Carroll theories)
2002 (most recent; long history of assessment tools – back to 1916)
for ages 2-0 thru 85+
Five factor scores – each is tested verbally and nonverbally
Fluid Reasoning
Knowledge
Quantitative Reasoning
Visual-Spatial Processing
Working Memory
Uses adaptive testing format (uses the first section to determine the difficulty level for the client)
Has an abbreviated battery; can also give Nonverbal Administration
Kaufman Series
2 types of intelligence (Horn-Cattell theory of intelligence):
Fluid: reasoning ability, nonverbal abilities, ability to solve new problems
Crystallized: acquired skills and knowledge; influenced by educational and cultural opportunities
Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT)
Ages 11-0 thru “over” 85
Includes a mental status exam
10 subtests
Has strong Neurological focus
Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC-2)
Ages 3 thru 18
18 subtests – different ones for different ages
Has nonverbal scale, too
Potential uses/misuses of cognitive assessments
Wechsler Series
intelligence is an aggregate of abilities
Specific factors:
verbal comprehension,
perceptual organization
working memory
processing speed
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-5)
2024
ages 16 thru 90
20 subtests
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-V)
2014
ages 6-0 thru 16-11
16 subtests
Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-IV)
2013
ages 2-6 thru 7yr7mo
Developmental focus on expressive and receptive language
Stanford Binet – Fifth Edition
3-level hierarchy of intelligence
(based on Spearman, Horn-Cattell-Carroll theories)
2002 (most recent; long history of assessment tools – back to 1916)
for ages 2-0 thru 85+
Five factor scores – each is tested verbally and nonverbally
Fluid Reasoning
Knowledge
Quantitative Reasoning
Visual-Spatial Processing
Working Memory
Uses adaptive testing format (uses the first section to determine the difficulty level for the client)
Has an abbreviated battery; can also give Nonverbal Administration
Kaufman Series
2 types of intelligence (Horn-Cattell theory of intelligence):
Fluid: reasoning ability, nonverbal abilities, ability to solve new problems
Crystallized: acquired skills and knowledge; influenced by educational and cultural opportunities
Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT)
Ages 11-0 thru “over” 85
Includes a mental status exam
10 subtests
Has strong Neurological focus
Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC-2)
Ages 3 thru 18
18 subtests – different ones for different ages
Has nonverbal scale, too
what are projectives (overview and general characteristics of projective methods)
based primarily on psychoanalytic theory
used to uncover a person’s characteristic modes of behavior (personality)
Involve interpreting responses to situations or stimuli that are ambiguous – they don’t elicit or compel particular responses – thus the client will “project” their personality
earliest techniques by Galton and Kraeplin (e.g., word association, cloud interpretation)
Ambiguous, unstructured stimuli are presented
forces client to impose structure, thus revealing part of “self”
method is indirect (i.e., purpose is disguised)
freedom of responses (no options)
interpretations involve many factors
Not as “fake-able” as objective tests
Shortcomings
Lack of objectivity
Scoring and interpretation can vary across psychologists
Insufficient psychometrics
Rorschach’s Inkblots
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
Children’s Apperception Test (CAT) and Senior Apperception Test (SAT)
Drawings
DrawAPerson
House-Tree-Person
Kinetic Family Drawing/kinetic school drawing
Association Tasks
Free Association
Sentence completions (like Rotter’s Incomplete Sentences Blank)
Dream Analysis
Play Interpretation (esp with children
advantages and disadvantages of objective and projective tests of personality
Projective test:
Shortcomings
Lack of objectivity
Scoring and interpretation can vary across psychologists
Insufficient psychometrics
Objective Personality:
advantages:
economical, easy to score and administer,
strong psychometrics,
objectivity
disadvantages:
focus is on behavior and not as much on motives or dynamics
overall type scores can be misleading
some face validity, so can be faked
forced choices not always representative
MMPI - 3
how are they used and interpreted
reliability and validity
Most recent version is MMPI-3 published in 2020.
MMPI was revised in 1990 by Butcher, Graham, et al; also developed the MMPI-A
Original MMPI in 1943 by Hathaway and McKinley
Most popular and psychometrically sound
335 questions; “t/f/cannot say” format
has validity scales which measure “test taking attitude”
control for malingering, carelessness, misunderstanding, random responding, etc.
Has clinical scales that compare the client’s responses to those with psych conditions
interpret full profiles - not just single answers (get “content/clinical scales” and validity scales)
used to screen for variety of personality characteristics (e.g., depression, paranoia, hypochondriasis)
NEO-PI
how are they used and interpreted
reliability and validity
Revised NEO-PI
based on 5 factor personality theory
Neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness
assesses “normal personality” not abnormal behavior
theoretical and historical context of personality testing
The theory behind them drives how we see personality. The earliest techniques were based on psychoanalytic theory. The word association, cloud interpretation, the TAT, and the Rorschach inkblots. Later, we found out that we gotta use objective assessments bc psychodynamic doesn't work as well. Things changed from using less projective tests and more objective tests in the 1950s because researchers found that test takers can best answer questions about themselves and therefore we can get a more accurate personality assessment. This is a better way than using projective tests because the unconscious can be taken in different ways depending on the person's perspective, which could make these tests unreliable. they have insufficient psychometrics.
what are the theoretical assumptions on which use of projectives and objective assessments are based
Techniques used to gather information about personality characteristics
Definition of personality
Varies –
Consistency/stability?
Awareness?
Influences characteristics assessed
e.g., typical, pathological, defenses, etc
Influences techniques used
Projective/Objective
Evidence Based Assessment
projective:
Ambiguous, unstructured stimuli are presented
forces client to impose structure, thus revealing part of “self”
Objective:
Administration of a standard set of questions or statements (unambiguous stimuli) to which the examinee responds using a fixed set of options
significant people and “events” in development and use of projectives (e.g., Galton, Kraeplin, Rorschach)
Galton:
Francis Galton conceptualized the projective techniques with an experiment, in 1897. He chose a number of words and allowed himself to associate as many as words to each of them within four seconds. (word association). He founded psychometrics tests. Galton was interested in understanding the psychological differences between people rather than common traits. This led to Introduction of Differential Psychology.
Kraeplin:
cloud interpretation test; using ambiguous stimuli to assess a person's personality. In the early 1900s, he divided all mental illnesses into exogenous (curable) and endogenous (incurable) categories, thus pioneering the classification of mental illness that continues with the current version of the DSM.
Rorschach:
In 1921, Herman Rorschach created the Rorschach Inkblot Method. This psychological test can help doctors analyze your personality and was once used to diagnose mental illnesses like schizophrenia.
5 /
Rorschach’s Inkblots
what are they, how are they used and interpreted?
reliability and validity of use
Clients were shown 10 inkblots and where asked what it might be. This allowed the clients to free associate and respond.
Thematic Apperception Test/Children’s Apperception Test
what are they; how are they used and interpreted
created by Henery Murray and Christina Morgan
It is like the Rorschach card, but instead the TAT cards feature interpersonal scenes rather than inkblots. Clients are then asked to make up a story to go along with each scene. Also asked to consider what happened before and what might happen after the scene.
nonempirical scoring and interpretation process
House/Tree/Person and Draw A Man / Kinetic Family Drawings
what are they; how are they used and interpreted
was shown in class
The house-tree-person test (HTP) is a projective test intended to measure different aspects of personality. Test takers are asked to draw a house, a tree, and a person. The interpretation of these drawings is used to create a picture of the person's cognitive, emotional, and social functioning.