Cognition Final

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/64

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

65 Terms

1
New cards

Recency vs Primacy Effect

  • Recency: small short term buffer (more recent terms)

  • Primacy: rehearsal is required (first items said)

2
New cards

Atkinson Shiffron Model (interference)

  • model has a large duration, going back and forth from STM to LTM

  • Interference: competition between items preventing consolidation

    • Reconsolidation massed vs spaced training

  • Encoding: consolidating a representation of info into memory

<ul><li><p>model has a large duration, going back and forth from STM to LTM</p></li><li><p><strong>Interference</strong>: competition between items preventing consolidation</p><ul><li><p>Reconsolidation massed vs spaced training</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Encoding: consolidating a representation of info into memory</p></li></ul><p></p>
3
New cards

Forgetting

  • Failure to Consolidate: no LTM

  • Failure to Retrieve: in LTM

  • Interference among cues

4
New cards

H.M. and types of amnesia

  • hippocampus removed

  • unable to form new memories

  • LTM was unaffected and STM was unaffected

    • however he couldn’t consolidate (go between) because of lack of hippocampus

  • Reterograde: LTM damage cant remember past

  • Anterograde: consolidation damage cant make new memories

  • Shows Procedural Memory is encoded seperately

    • HM could do learning task just like everyone else

<ul><li><p>hippocampus removed </p></li><li><p>unable to form new memories</p></li><li><p>LTM was unaffected and STM was unaffected</p><ul><li><p>however he couldn’t consolidate (go between) because of lack of hippocampus </p></li></ul></li><li><p>Reterograde: LTM damage cant remember past </p></li><li><p>Anterograde: consolidation damage cant make new memories</p></li><li><p><strong>Shows Procedural Memory is encoded seperately</strong></p><ul><li><p>HM could do learning task just like everyone else</p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
5
New cards

Types of Memory (Declarative: episodic, semantic, procedural: mental imagery)

  • Declarative (explicit)

    • episodic: first person memory of an experience

    • semantic/propositional: knowledge of facts

  • Procedural (implicit)

    • how to do things - motor procedures

    • mental imagery: knowledge of appearance of things

6
New cards

Verbal Encoding, STM Capacity, Patient SF

  • Capacity is 7 plus or minus 2

    • thats why phone numbers have 7 digits!

  • Verbal Encoding: verbal distraction interferes with encoding while visual doesn’t

  • Patient SF: taught to chunk rapidly

    • didn’t have more slots for chunks in memory just could fit more digits in each chunk

7
New cards

Imagistic vs Propositional Representations

  • Imagistic: stores the sensory experience

    • visual representation in your mind: (image)

  • Propositional: stores the abstract relation

    • “the cat was under the chair”

<ul><li><p><strong>Imagistic</strong>: stores the sensory experience</p><ul><li><p>visual representation in your mind: (image)</p></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>Propositional</strong>: stores the abstract relation</p><ul><li><p>“the cat was under the chair”</p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
8
New cards

Mental Rotation

  • mental analog of physical rotation

  • spatially organized analog of a real picture is progressively transformed

<ul><li><p>mental analog of physical rotation</p></li><li><p>spatially organized <strong>analog</strong> of a real picture is progressively transformed</p></li></ul><p></p>
9
New cards

Mental Scanning

  • Mental distance is an analog of real distance

  • more map distance = longer it takes

  • Proof mental imagery exists

<ul><li><p>Mental distance is an analog of real distance</p></li><li><p>more map distance = longer it takes </p></li><li><p><strong>Proof mental imagery exists</strong></p></li></ul><p></p>
10
New cards

Mental Imagery Debate

  • Kosslyn

    • pro mental imagery

    • evaluation → visual system

  • Pylyshyn (Rutgers)

    • representations of images are propositional/descriptive

    • scanning results due to cognitive expectations of subjects

11
New cards

Property Inheritance

  • If x is a y and y has property z then x has property z

  • direct property wins!

  • inference ability = efficient form of reconstructive memory

  • Hierarchical Structure (top is superordinate to bottom subordinate)

<ul><li><p>If x is a y and y has property z then x has property z</p></li><li><p>direct property wins!</p></li><li><p>inference ability = efficient form of reconstructive memory</p></li><li><p><strong>Hierarchical Structure</strong> (top is superordinate to bottom subordinate)</p></li></ul><p></p>
12
New cards

Induction vs Deduction

  • Induction: specific to general

    • if it rains on saturday and it rains on sunday it rains on weekends

    • a guess/generalization

  • Deduction: general to specific

    • all men are mortal, socrates is a man, socrates is mortal

    • logical conclusion

13
New cards

David Hume

  • will the sun rise tomorrow? How do you know?

  • Hume: belief that the sun will rise tomorrow isn’t logically sound and only whats likely

  • Induction not deduction: not guaranteed to be valid

14
New cards

Classical vs Modern View of Categories

  • Classical View

    • categories have logical constructs and definitions

    • definitions have necessary and jointly sufficient features

    • clear cut categories but is a hotdog a sandwich?

  • Fuzziness and Family Resemblance

    • most mental categories have fuzzy boundaries with family groups

    • Ex. game, furniture

  • Exemplar Model

    • comparing information to stored examples/exemplars in brain

    • no generalization/abstraction

15
New cards

Classical Concept Learning Experiment

  • Find the rules!

  • Ex. Squares or small and green shapes

  • Conjunction was easier than disjunction

  • assumed concepts are defined with logic

<ul><li><p>Find the rules!</p></li><li><p>Ex. Squares or small and green shapes</p></li><li><p>Conjunction was easier than disjunction</p></li><li><p>assumed concepts are defined with logic</p></li></ul><p></p>
16
New cards

Prototypes

  • Posner and Keele (1998) - prototypification = “normal form”

  • Ex. prototype of bird

    • each feature in proportion to its prevalence; not necessary/sufficient

  • distinguishing core meaning and identification purposes

<ul><li><p>Posner and Keele (1998) - prototypification = “normal form”</p></li><li><p>Ex. prototype of bird</p><ul><li><p>each feature in proportion to its prevalence; not necessary/sufficient</p></li></ul></li><li><p><u>distinguishing core meaning and identification purposes</u></p></li></ul><p></p>
17
New cards

Geometric Model + Multidimensional Scaling

  • Geometric Model

    • analogous to proximity in some mental space

      • dissimilarity is more distance, similarity is closeness

  • Multidimensional Scaling

    • ranking dissimilarity among set of items finds positions in imaginary space

      • x axis is money y axis is sporty

<ul><li><p><strong>Geometric Model</strong></p><ul><li><p>analogous to <strong>proximity</strong> in some <strong>mental space</strong></p><ul><li><p>dissimilarity is more distance, similarity is closeness</p></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>Multidimensional Scaling</strong></p><ul><li><p>ranking dissimilarity among set of items finds positions in imaginary space </p><ul><li><p>x axis is money y axis is sporty</p></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
18
New cards

Euclidean distance vs city block distance

  • Euclidean (as the crow flies) - purple

  • City Block Distance - pink

<ul><li><p>Euclidean (as the crow flies) - purple</p></li><li><p>City Block Distance - pink</p></li></ul><p></p>
19
New cards

Distance Axioms

  • Symmetry - distance from A to B = distance from B to A

  • Triangle Inequality - distance from A to B + distance from B to C has to be greater than the distance from A to C

    • shortest distance between 2 points is a straight line

20
New cards

Similarity and Distance Axioms

  • Similarity DOES NOT obey distance axioms

    • geometric model is wrong

  • apple compared to pomegranate was more liked compared to pomegranate vs apple

  • also failed triangle of inequality

21
New cards

Contrast Model

  • Similarity of A + B = Features shared between A and B - Features of just A - Features of just B

    • uses featural model to contrast features

    • can violate triangle of inequality but is still used

22
New cards

Connectionism/Pandemonium

  • Connectionism

    • artificial neural network is the alternative approach to cognitive architecture

    • rooted in empiricism/associationism

    • ties to neuroscience

  • Pandemonium

    • lots of small individual parts and layers make up larger system

<ul><li><p><strong>Connectionism</strong></p><ul><li><p>artificial neural network is the alternative approach to cognitive architecture</p></li><li><p>rooted in empiricism/associationism</p></li><li><p>ties to neuroscience</p></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>Pandemonium</strong></p><ul><li><p>lots of small individual parts and layers make up larger system</p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
23
New cards

McClelland and Rumelhart

  • parallel distributed processing book

  • dumb device that recognizes its stroke

  • Flaw: cant possibly be infinite neurons to make infinite sentences

<ul><li><p>parallel distributed processing book</p></li><li><p>dumb device that recognizes its stroke</p></li><li><p>Flaw: cant possibly be infinite neurons to make infinite sentences</p></li></ul><p></p>
24
New cards

Training a Neural Network

  • drawing examples from a training set

  • Supervised: know what the output should be by comparing to an oracle

  • modify parameters to improve performance by altering connection weights

  • repeat many times and reevaluate

  • approximates target function

25
New cards

Backpropagation

  • feed input and get output

  • oracle compares actual output to target output

  • compares discrepancy (error) between target/actual

  • Reduce error and repeat

<ul><li><p>feed input and get output</p></li><li><p>oracle compares actual output to target output</p></li><li><p>compares discrepancy (error) between target/actual</p></li><li><p>Reduce error and repeat </p></li></ul><p></p>
26
New cards

Principles of Connectionism

  • biological plausibility - should be based of the brain

  • parallel computation - brain = many units working at the same time

  • distributed knowledge - all info is on the weights (spread)

  • 1 universal learning model - 1 mechanism for all parts

27
New cards

Symbol System vs Connectionism

  • Symbol System - rationalist/nativist

    • brain uses rules with symbols

    • different learning mechanism

    • some knowledge is innate

  • Connectionism - empiricist/associationism

    • rules/symbols = epiphenominon

    • 1 general mechanism

    • all knowledge is learned

28
New cards

Long Term Potentiation

  • how one synaptic connection excites another

  • Excitatory: raising excitatory weight

  • Inhibitory: raising inhibitory weight

29
New cards

Deep Learning

  • more layers with a huge database for training

  • Is it like human learning?

    • yes - induction/neural network

    • no - need billions of examples and is bad at generalizing

30
New cards

Reasoning (prescriptive vs descriptive)

  • going from premises (existing beliefs) to conclusions

  • Prescriptive - how should reasoning work?

  • Descriptive - how does reasoning work

31
New cards

Induction

  • “squirrels like nuts, squirrels are like badgers, badgers like nuts”

  • plausible not objectively valid

  • Thomas Bayes: we can quantify degree of belief as probability “common sense calculations

32
New cards

Deduction (Modes of Deduction)

  • Modus Ponens: If A then B, if A is true, B is true

  • Modus Tollens: If A then B, B is false, A is false

  • A → B (A is antecedent and B is consequent)

  • Probable Modus Ponens: P(AIB) is high = P(B) is high

  • Probable Modus Tollens: P(AIB) is low = P(B) is low

33
New cards

Wason Selection Task

  • Vowel on one side # on the other

  • Cards say: U K 4 7

    • most people want to flip U and 4

    • Logically you should flip U and 7

  • If under 18 you have to drink coke

    • most people want to check under 18 and wine drinkers

    • logically you should flip under 18 and wine drinkers

  • Conclusion: humans are not very good at reasoning, deductions aren’t always useful, many inferences we make are not deduction

34
New cards

Probabilities

  • P(A) = probability that A is true (true is 1, false is 0, P(A) = between 0-1)

  • P(-A) = 1 - P(A) probability of not A is the probability of 1-P(A)

  • P(A and B) - probability that A and B are true

    • Conjunction Rule: probability of A and B has to be greater than 0 and less that P(A)

  • P(A V B) - probability of A or B

    • Disjunction Rule: probability of A or B is greater than the P(A) but less than 1

35
New cards

Conditional Probability / Reasoning

  • P(AIB) = probability of A given B is true

    • P(AIB) = probability of A and B / Probability of B

    • P(AIB) x P(B) = P(A and B)

36
New cards

Bayesian Inference

  • allows you to compute how strongly to believe H as a function

  • form beliefs in an optimal way, normative reasoning, objectively correct

  • Likelihood - degree which H fits evidence

  • Prior Probability - how likely H before evidence

  • Posterior Probability - probability of H given D

<ul><li><p>allows you to compute how strongly to believe H as a function</p></li><li><p><strong>form beliefs in an optimal way, normative reasoning, objectively correct</strong></p></li><li><p>Likelihood - degree which H fits evidence</p></li><li><p>Prior Probability - how likely H before evidence</p></li><li><p>Posterior Probability - probability of H given D </p></li></ul><img src="https://knowt-user-attachments.s3.amazonaws.com/d497d880-1c71-422a-8eff-8bf782470966.png" data-width="100%" data-align="center"><p></p>
37
New cards

Are People Bayesian? (Conjunction Fallacy)

  • Economics - people make optimal use of information acting in own rational self interest → Bayesian!

  • Conjunction Fallacy: more people are likely to say Linda is a feminist and bank teller rather than just a bank teller

    • subset should be smaller than the whole thought

  • Perhaps perception is but cognition isn’t but its still highly debated

<ul><li><p>Economics - people make optimal use of information acting in <u>own rational self interest</u> → Bayesian!</p></li><li><p><strong>Conjunction Fallacy</strong>: more people are likely to say Linda is a feminist and bank teller rather than just a bank teller</p><ul><li><p>subset should be smaller than the whole thought</p></li></ul></li><li><p>Perhaps perception is but cognition isn’t but its still highly debated </p></li></ul><p></p>
38
New cards

Representativeness Heuristic

  • Heuristic: approximate strategy for problem solving thats easier than optimal strategy

  • In this scenario subjects typically say 80% because people ignore the prior

  • people dont use bayes rule but instead use heuristics and biases

  • Prescriptivists: this kind of reasoning is genuinely defective

  • Adaptive Strategies: heuristics work well in real ilfe

<ul><li><p>Heuristic: approximate strategy for problem solving thats easier than optimal strategy</p></li><li><p>In this scenario subjects typically say 80% because people ignore the prior</p></li><li><p>people dont use bayes rule but instead use heuristics and biases</p></li><li><p><strong>Prescriptivists</strong>: this kind of reasoning is genuinely defective</p></li><li><p><strong>Adaptive Strategies</strong>: heuristics work well in real ilfe</p></li></ul><p></p>
39
New cards

Fallacies

  • Law of small numbers - people use small representations to draw conclusions

  • Hot Hand fallacy - one side of the coin is hot so p(H) is more than 50%

  • Gamblers Fallacy - HHHHHTHHHH tails is due so P(T) is more than 50%

40
New cards

Expected Value

  • long run average value (EV=sum of xp(x))

  • 50% chance of one inch of rain

    • 0.5×1+0.5×0 =0.5 inches

  • The rational price of a bet is its expected value

41
New cards

Subjective Utility

  • how desirable something is to someone

  • Maximizing expected utility is how people make decisions

<ul><li><p>how desirable something is to someone </p></li><li><p>Maximizing expected utility is how people make decisions</p></li></ul><p></p>
42
New cards

Risks and Risk Aversion

  • Do you pick 100% chance of $10 or 50% chance of $20

    • expected values are the same

  • Risk Aversion: preference for certain gain over chance of loss

  • 50% chance of $20 or 99% chance of $12

    • EV 1 = $10 EV 2 = $10.88

43
New cards

Temporal Discounting

  • Do you want 90% chance of $11 now or 90% chance of $15 in a year?

  • Most people choose the first option because subjective devaluation of future value

44
New cards

Preference Reversals

  • if you prefer A to B it shouldn’t matter the other choices

  • You have a choice between chocolate, german chocolate, and vanilla, you prefer chocolate but you are scared because of similar option so you go with vanilla

  • Allais Paradox - offered 50% of $100 or 100% of $50 people choose 2 even though both EVs are $50;

    • however they want 5% of $100 instead of 10% of $50 even though they are the same too

45
New cards

Framing Effects

  • changing the wording of a question to alter decisions

  • You have 600 people on a sinking ship do you

    • save 200 or kill 400? Same thing hahaha

46
New cards

Sunk Cost Fallacy

  • continuing to invest in something due to the resources you have previously spent on it

  • past should not impact your choice but the framing of the past does

47
New cards

Bounded Rationality

  • humans are rational but limited in terms of info, time, comp resources

  • Satisficing: choosing the first acceptable pick or deciding based on one issue only

48
New cards

Chomsky vs Skinner

  • Skinner

    • humans learn language via reinforcement

  • Chomsky

    • infinite compositionality and productivity proves that Skinner was wrong

    • not all sentences have been said… so how could they be reinforced?

    • “colorless green ideas sleep furiously” makes no sense but is still valid

    • all leads to an abstract rule system which makes up grammar

49
New cards

Ape Language

  • Skinner - if correct apes should be able to learn ASL

  • Chomsky - if right they shouldn’t be able to because they need innate structures

  • Result: apes can learn vocab but they learned little syntax

50
New cards

Competence vs Performance

  • Competence: abstract knowledge held by a competent speaker, what you implicitly know about distinguishing between languages

  • Performance: how this works in practice, actual mechanisms for carrying out speech/hearing

51
New cards

Prescriptivist vs Descriptivist

  • Prescriptivist: rules tell you how to do language correctly “don’t split infinitive”

  • Descriptivist: rules tell you how its actually done

52
New cards

Universal Grammar

  • all natural languages have common structures which are innate (Chomsky)

  • all have words and sentences

  • all have nouns, verbs, and other parts of speech

  • systematic variations of each other (SVO, SOV, OSV)

  • how to form a question (insert SV, Auxiliary verbs)

  • which words modify the others (the boy with the dog was happy)

53
New cards

Is Language Innate?

  • humans have unique ability to learn language without overt instructions

  • some aspects of language have a critical period

  • Poverty of the Stimulus - linguistic input isnt enough for a child to learn rules of a language

    • Im going to eat lunch → im gonna eat lunch

    • Im going to New York → Im gonna New York

  • Only universal grammar is innate while specific details have to be learned

54
New cards

Subjects in Linguistics

  • Phonology - study of sounds (consonants, vowels, variations)

  • Morphology - construction of words out of units that carry meaning (morphemes)

  • Syntax - ordering words to form sentences (grammar)

  • Semantics - meaning and logical form

  • Pragmatics - practical aspects of conversation (what did someone mean? what do i say next?)

55
New cards

Syntax

  • abstract rules for legal sentences that sound normal and make sense to a native speaker

  • generative grammar - produces all and only the legal structures in the given language

    • ex. rewrite rules: The dog chased the cat. The tree chased the cat. The noun chased the cat

    • Recursion adds an extra adjective every time you do it

  • Tone localization experiments confirm “psychological realities” of boundaries

56
New cards

Syntactic Ambiguity/Garden Path Sentences

  • sentences can be parsed i 2 or more ways

    • ex. “the girl hit the dog with the stick”

  • Garden Path Sentence - principle of minimal attachment

    • ex. “the cotton shirts are made from comes from Alabama.”

57
New cards

Phonology

  • Sounds of a language; individual sounds = phonemes

    • “Tooth” = /t/oo/th

    • English has 44 phonemes

  • Phonological Parameters

    • Manner of Articulation - stop (p,b,t,d) or fricative (f,s,th)

    • Place of Articulation - bilabial (p,b) or labiodental (f,v)

    • Voicing characteristics - voiced/voiceless (f/v, s/z, th/th)

58
New cards

Categorical Perception

  • elevated sensitivity to sensory differences across categorical boundaries

  • In continuous categories (color spectrum) people see categories instead of one fluid scale

  • after critical period - can hear distinction between categories but not within

<ul><li><p>elevated sensitivity to sensory differences across <strong>categorical boundaries</strong></p></li><li><p>In continuous categories (color spectrum) people see categories instead of one fluid scale</p></li><li><p>after critical period - can hear distinction between categories but not within</p></li></ul><p></p>
59
New cards

Semantics

  • lexical semantics - accessing mental lexicons

    • ex. man gave woman a hand → knowing meaning

  • Reference

    • the man ate the sandwich he made (he and the man corefer)

    • the man looked at him in the mirror (the man does not refer to him)

  • Locigcal Form

    • the boss takes her coffee with sugar

      • she usually takes it with sugar OR she is currently drinking coffee with sugar

    • Everyone has a cell phone

      • all people share 1 phone OR all people have their own phone

60
New cards

Phrase Semantics

  • brick house/rabbit house

    • house made of bricks vs a house where rabbits live

  • Implicature: inferred propositions that are understood as premises

    • Where in England did he visit implied that he visited England

    • Do you beat your wife on Sundays implied that you beat your wife other days

61
New cards

Morphology

  • pieces of words that carry meaning (tense, gender, number)

  • roots, prefixed, suffixes

  • Cat+s = 2 morphemes

  • Potato = one morpheme

  • re+paint+s = 3 morphemes

62
New cards

Past Tense War

  • Morphological Rule - add -ed

    • talk → talked (+1 sound)

    • aid → aided (+1 syllable)

    • bug → bugged (d sound)

  • Lots of exceptions: is/was go/went read/read but not need/needed

63
New cards

U shaped Curve and Over-regularization

  • Overregularization: child learns the rules and over-applies it as the learn the exceptions

    • this is why there seems to be a dip in childs progress of language learning

  • Wug Test: today I wug, yesterday I _____

    • any common speaker can pass this test

<ul><li><p><strong>Overregularization</strong>: child learns the rules and over-applies it as the learn the exceptions</p><ul><li><p>this is why there seems to be a dip in childs progress of language learning</p></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>Wug Test</strong>: today I wug, yesterday I _____</p><ul><li><p>any common speaker can pass this test </p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
64
New cards

Pinker + Price’s Rebuttal

  • Network generalizes incorrectly

  • some make mistakes no kid does (squat → squakt; mail → membled)

  • cant handle homophonous verbs (fly/flew; but flied out)

  • Mis ordering issue and rigged U shape curve (regulars first - irregulars later when its actually a mix of both)

65
New cards

Past Tense Neural Network

  • input/output by backpropagation on surface forms

  • no rules, no morphemes, no distinction (1 mechanism)

  • application of a general mechanism

  • replicated U shaped learning curve