1/96
These flashcards cover essential vocabulary and concepts from the lecture on making better decisions in life, love, and financial matters.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Normative
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
How should people make decisions? Characteristics: rational; optimizing; forward-looking.
Descriptive
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
How do people make decisions? Related concepts: boundedly rational; limited cognitive capacity; heuristics; satisficing; myopic.
Prescriptive
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
How can we help people make better decisions? Related concepts: choice architecture, debiasing; repairs; corrective measures; preventive measures.
Behavioral Economics
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
A field focusing on the effects of psychological, cognitive, emotional, cultural, and social factors on the economic decisions of individuals.
Algorithms
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
data-based, machine-driven prediction procedures that vary in complexity. (i.e: linear regression, decision trese, deep learning NN)
Debiasing
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Efforts and interventions designed to reduce biases in decision-making.
Gardner & Voice assistants
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Predicted that by 2020, people will engage more with digital assistants they their spouses
Shows that voice assistant mange so many tasks and many smart speakers sold
Experiment: Shopping with Voice Assistants
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Building trust has a direct correlation with overall ratings
Only 39% of consumers trust in “personalized” product selection of smart speakers
Only 44% believe/rate they offer the actual best value selection of products
Human Experts with Weather Forecasters vs ER Doctors
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Weather Forecast human are very good at predicting.
but, physicians, after completing history and physical examination, estimate prob. that patient had pneumonia is very bad (at most it seems like 14-15%)
The difference is feedback. You get really fast feedback as a weather forecaster. But for doctors, it’s better to be cautious and you don’t get an answer right away or even get one anyways. As a weather forecaster, the stakes are lower.
Give the 6 reasons for why forecasting is so hard
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Confirmation bias
Lack of clear feedback
Incentives
Illusion of Control
Hindsight Bias
Emotions
Heuristics
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Mental shortcuts that ease the cognitive load of making a decision.
Satisficing
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Choosing an option that meets a minimum standard rather than the optimal one.
Choice Architecture
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts + Module 2 Health Decisions
The design of different ways in which choices can be presented to consumers.
Applying the techniques of the psychology of decision making and behavioral science to improve decisions without limiting choices
these choice architecture always perform some sort of nudging
Illusory Correlation
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
The perception of a relationship between two variables when no such relationship exists.
We tend to focus on information consistent with a desired outcome, and ignore information that is inconsistent with that outcome
example: draw a person test
Study: Draw a Person Test (DAP)
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Clinical Psychologists use of the DAP. Patient draw a person and psychologist analyze the drawing. Allegedly, more paranoid => crazier facial features.
However, research indicates that the test has no validity
When told to psychologists, they kinda deny it and trust themselves and their judgement
Follow-up studies with untrained college students also report this same pattern of self-trust as clinicians
Confirmation Bias
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
The tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information that confirms one's preexisting beliefs.
Then in this case, we tend to not look for disconfirming evidence too! And there is no feedback on options not taken
i.e: cornell doesn’t check up on ppl it doesn’t admit, so you don’t know how those people are doing → confirmation bias
John Holt: How Children Fail main takeway
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Children fear negatives and nos, why they love positives and yes. Even if get the same amount of info for both positive and negative case, children cling to the idea that only good answer is a yes answer
Sir Francis Bacon quote
(you might be thinking, why do you have to memorize a quote. Well hm! I ask that to myself too BUT THE LAST TWO PRELIMS THEY ASK US QUESTIONS ABOUT WHO SAID WHAT QUOTE SO IM PUTTING IT ON URGH)
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
The human understanding, when any proposition
has been once laid down…forces everything else to
add fresh support and confirmation…it is the
peculiar and perpetual error of the human
understanding to be more moved and excited by
affirmatives than negatives.
John Stuart Mill on Feedback Quote
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
"It is evident that the instances on one side of a question are more likely to be remembered and recorded than those on the other. . . especially if there be any strong motive to preserve the memory of the first but not the latter, these last are likely to be overlooked and escape the attention of the mass of mankind."
Feedback Loops
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
The process where the outputs of a system are circled back and used as inputs.
Three implicit biases in hiring
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Facial Symmetry
Attractiveness
Height
Blink: Gladwell on CEO and Height
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Tall people get paid more and become CEO more often
Causes positive unconscious associations
CEO average height 3 inches taller than average male height
6 issues for who to hire and 6 solutions for who to hire
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
6 issues:
Most assessments occur in first 3-5 minutes (LT)
People have implicit biases (LM)
Individual interviewers are inconsistent (LB)
We think we’re great at interviewing but never actually check (RT)
Interview tasks do not predict on-the-job success (RM)
References and years of work experience are not predictive (RB)
6 solutions:
Use structured interviews, scored with a rubric
Don’t let managers choose their own teams
Use multiple interviews (“wisdom of crowds”)
Give interviewers feedback across their interviews
Set objective task-related standards
Work sample tests and test of general cognitive ability are predictive
Paul Meehl: Clinical vs. Stastical Prediction
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
humans or algs for college admissions decisions?
umm so which one did he support? Paul Meehl advocated for statistical prediction over clinical judgment, arguing that algorithms generally lead to more accurate outcomes in college admissions and other decision-making scenarios.
Model Prediction
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Using statistical or machine learning models to forecast outcomes based on input data.
Implicit Bias
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Unconscious attitudes or stereotypes that affect one's understanding, actions, and decisions.
Actuarial Models, Expert’s Intuitive Judgment, and Boostrapped Model
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Actuarial Models:
Statistical models used to evaluate and predict outcomes based on historical data.
DV = actual outcomes from past Data
Expert’s Intuitive Judgment:
Ye
Bootstrapped Model, DV = Expert’s Judgements
Yb = B1x1 + … Bnxn
Linear Models vs Human Experts Study
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
A type of model that predicts output variables using a linear combination of input variables.
Ground rules: same data, goodness of fit used as validity measure
Actuarial model > boostrap > intuitive in all fields and in total
Actuarial model outperforms expert intuition, but so does boostrapped model too so yay!
Noisy Decisions
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Decisions made by humans which are often inconsistent and affected by various biases.
Oskamp 1965 on judges:
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
More information produces higher confidence (i.e: overconfidence), but no increase in accuracy
Goldberg (1965) on judges
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
judges have a hard time distinguishing between valid and invalid cues. So that means experts often do not outperform novices. And especially true when feedback is missing or sporadic.
Peter Brand and Billy Beane meaning for this class
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
“It's about getting things down to one number. Using stats to reread them, we'll find the value of players that nobody else
can see. People are overlooked for a variety of biased reasons and perceived flaws. Age, appearance, personality. Bill James and mathematics cuts straight through that.
Actuarial model (no humans) da best basically and Billy Jeane as Brad Pitt is another steal ig
FiveThirtyEight forecasts
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
some good but for politics its actually very noisy!!
Algorithms, linear modals and bias
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Algorithms and linear models should be less noisy and more consistent that humans but are also probably biased, because algorithms that bootstrap human decisions learn the same biases as humans!
Study: A Manager and an AI walk into a bar: Does ChatGPT make biased decisions like we do?
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Use 18 common human biases relevant to decisions making categorized as (Biases in judgements regarding risk, Biases in evaluation of outcomes, heuristics in decision-making)
Judgement Regarding Risk: Chat mostly max expected payoffs, with risk aversion only demonstrated when expected payoffs are equal. Not understand ambiguity. Exhibits high overconfidence
Evaluation of Outcomes: chat is very sensitive to framing, reference points, and salience of information. Not sensitive to sunk costs or endowment effect.
Heuristics in Decision Making: more research needed. seems that confirmation bias is present
Thinking Fast and Slow: Daniel Kahneman
what is system 1, system 2?
System 1- reflexive intuitive emotional
System 2 - reflective, deliberative, thoughtful (more of this → less noise)
Procedural Decision-Making
Module 5 lec 1: Algorithms & Experts
Decisions become less noisy when people need to share their decisions rules with someone else
“High describability” rules work even in extremely y complex choice environments
Also reduce the cognitive effort needed to make decisions
Amsterdam Airport Choice Architecture & Nudging
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
put a fake fly in urinal which decreased spillage by alot (bc people aim more) lol
subtle change in design
Sharif & Shu 2017: Exercise Persistence
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Reserve help/skip days with exercise schedule will more likely help you reach your end goal!
In the findings the rankings were: Reserve-Weekly > Reserve-Monthly > Easy > Hard
In the end, it’s better to set hard goals with emergency skip days. If you falter, don’t beat yourself up!
6 Exercise Hacks at the Gym
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Temptation Bundling (run while playing genshin impact idk)
have a gym buddy
incentives to return (i.e: money ever time you exercise, works bc ppl undervalue future benefits such as health. providing incentive now is more effective and decrease present bias)
creating habits but with flexibility (workout plan but w/ flexibility and rewards! i.e: piano stairs fun workout)
Small rewards
Giuntella, Saccardo, and Sado 2024 Sleep Study
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Undergraduates at uni track sleep with Fitbit. Goal to sleep at least 7 hours every weeknight
Intervention condition: bedtime cue, morning feedback, and immediate reward for meeting this goal
Results:
intervention led to more sleep, less evening screen time on streaming or scrolling, and no change in time spent studying, and higher GPAs for that semester
Riis & Ratner 2014: Diet Hacks on Labeling
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Went from pyramid labeling to plate labeling, which is much more intuitive and understanding to people.
Diet Hacks: Framing Effects
+Another example: people prefer 93% lean beef or 7% fat beef? (Levin & Gaeth 1988)
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
People buy the product that says 0% fat more than the 100% fat free because of the framing of its fat content.
People prefer 93% beef and said its higher quality and tastiness too. Even after tasing the beefs still the same rankings.
Diet Hacks: Plate & Bowl Sizes
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Using smaller dishware can lead to reduced portion sizes and lower food intake, helping individuals manage their diet more effectively.
putting food in to-go box immediately is better so don’t eat all at once!
Diet Hacks: Food Order
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
interventions by placing healthier foods first then unhealthy food later
can see this in school cafeterias
Diet Hacks: What are the 4 diet hacks discussed in lecture (not in the study)
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Labeling
Framing Effects
Plate and Bowl sizes
Food Order
Diet Hacks: What are the 7 diet hacks in this study not lecture, its categorization as a nudge, and rankings among all of them?
Three categories to choose from: Cognitive nudges, affective nudges, and behavioural nudges
(Chandon & Cadario 2019)
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Behavioural Nudges: highest
Size enhancements (plate size) highest highest
Convenience enhancement
Affective nudges: middle
Pleasure appeals
Healthy eating calls
Cognitive Nudges: lowest
Visibility enhancements (i see this first!)
Evaluative labeling
Descriptive labeling
Happiness Hacks: Decisions
(Niedenthal 2007)
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Make happiness salient (most noticeable most important)
this just means remind yourself to be happy
track your activities!
Happiness Hacks: Design
(Wirtz et al 2021; Vanman, Baker & Tobin 2018)
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Nudges for sleep & good havits
avoid social mediate & upward comparisons … hmm… but tiktok
Happiness Hacks: Doing
Bonhs 2021
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
spend time with people helping others
choose experiences over materials/things
give compliments
treat somebody if you having a bad day
What are the three happiness hacks talked in lecture? (very vague so better to actual understand each part in detail on the other flashcards)
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Decisions
Design
Doing
Defaults via Planning Prompts
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Encourage people to form plans for a certain situation and implement a certain response
this causes concrete alignment with desired behavior and future moment
makes procrastination more difficult
forgetfulness less likely!
Both experiments for planning prompts: flu shots and colonoscopy
Milkman, Beshears, Choi, Laibson, and Madrian (2011)
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Flu shots:
control condition is just employees informed of the dates/ times of workplace flu clinics
make a plan condition: employees allowed to choose a concrete date and time for flu vaccine
result: 37% treatment > 33% control
Colonoscopy Study:
same conditions but now for colonscopy. plans made on sticky note.
after 6 months follow-through rates: 7.2% (plan) > 6.2% (control)
Smarter Implied Defaults
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Some options are:
Precommit to a default date (i.e: on january 23rd I WILL jump into the gorge)
Use shorter deadlines (explicitly or implied)
Michigan ICU and Checklist Study:
Provonost and others (2006)
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Using checklist for ICU preparation reduced rate of infection drastically.
Even if checklist stuff seems obvious it’s still really useful. The Michigan ICU and Checklist Study demonstrated that implementing a structured checklist for ICU procedures significantly decreased infection rates. This highlights the value of standardizing practices, even for seemingly obvious protocols, in improving patient outcomes. (okay ai what a banger explanation)
Intrinsic motivation vs Extrinsic motivation
what’s better for long term change?
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Intrinsic: stimulation stemming from within oneself
i live for tomatoes
i.e: social comparison is an intrinsic motivation that make significant results
extrinsic motivation: encouragement from an outside force
i.e: payment for changing outcomes/behaviors
extrinsic is ok for shorter term, but intrinsic for long term
Incentives of Social Comparison
(example 1: reducing AC consumption. 2: reducing overprescribing antibiotics)
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Nobody wants to be the worst compared to peers, an intrinsic value that can be very important
Reducing AC consumption:
drop in AC only when ppl are told their neighbors consume less AC
Reducing overprescribing antibiotics:
defaults: no antibiotics
justifications: justify the antibiotics reduction
feedback on suage
social comparisons: compare doctors to other doctors, so doctors are competitive so social comparisons made the biggest difference
Scrarcity and ownership
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Scarcity refers to the perception that resources are limited, which can heighten the perceived value of ownership. Ownership gives individuals a sense of control and attachment to their possessions, often leading to increased motivation and decision-making insights regarding resource management.
I.e “You have been selected to complete colon cancer screening that could save your life!” omg i want to live
What are the 6 principles of good choice architecture
Module 3 Lecture 2: Health Decisions
Use defaults (planning prompts, precommit to defaults, smarter implied defaults)
Give feedback (i.e: ambient orb turns colors based on energy consumption; medication reminders by chaing cap color and last time bottle oppened; hospital challenge handwashing by putting up tags that glow red if not wash, patients then ask not knowing what that means )
Allow for error (need reminders, but allow mistakes bc they’re inevitable; i.e: seatbelt sings, sign on the road to remind you to look a way when its not intuitive, medication packs with a day listed for each poil so you know you haven’t missed one)
Structure complex choices (netflix or hulu separating by genre; hposital environment with checklists which was adapted by airplane pilots )
Understand mappings (# crunches instead of calories on starbucks drinks)
Think about incentives (including social ones; i.e: what doctors and patients want and care about)
Disclosures
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions 1
Forms created to provide information useful in important (financial) decisions
mandated disclosures are required by gov. to assist consumers in specific transactions
CFPB
(Johnson & Leary 2017)
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions 1
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau implement regulations requiring disclosures for several financial markets;
examples:
TILA-RESPA integrated disclosure: mortgages, overdraft coverage on checking accounts, prepaid cards. Provides truth in lending disclosures.
explicitly directed by Congress
Types of disclosures
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions 1
warnings
information:
provider/gov thinks you should be totally aware of the responsibilities you have regarding payments and expectations if you take a certain loan
feature descriptions
firm trying to highlight certain features that sound very appealing, while the gov doesn’t share their enthusiasm a bout said agreements
conflict of interest
i.e: influencers are required to disclose when they are being paid to sponsor a product, or got a product for free
public disclosures
Goal of disclosures and role of constructed preferences
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions 1
provide easily accessible info, a disinfectant to manipulations, and access to aggregated wisdom
overcome problem of asymmetric information
Role of constructed preferences: may accidentally affect preferences
Describe the model of consumer disclosures and some negative detail/outcomes for each step
5 steps
where would an optional and mandated disclosure come into place?
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions 1
The issue is explained in the screenshot
Identification of need: preferences assumed to be known and stable
Information Gathering (Optional Disclosure): timely’ update beliefs about options
Evaluation of Outcomes: measurable attributes
Finalization of Options (Mandated Disclosure): attention & understanding of product attributes
Choice: optimal given preferences and knowledge
The MPG Illusion:
10 mpg to 20 mpg VS 25 mpg to 50 mpg
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions 1
is a cognitive bias leading to bad decision-making!
Low MPG is better, but people see big MPG numbers and are like omg!! But this is wrong!!!
There was also a short time where people argued window stickers should be in gallons/100 miles instead of MPG
Annual Percentage Rate (APR)
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
It refers to the yearly interest rate you'll pay if you carry a balance, plus any fees associated with the card and expressed as a percentage. APR helps in comparing the cost of loans or credit cards.
Minimum Interest Charge
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
a fee that is charged to your account when the interest fees you have due are below a certain amount
Student Loans (College) like what’s on it
What is defaulting on a loan for student loans and default rates
What are for-profit colleges and their issue
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
University must break down what you are paying (i.e: scholarships, work-study options, monthly fee after graduation). You should compare it to how much you expect to earn if you get the degree there.
Grade Rates and Retention Rates
Must tell your default rates:
Defaulting on a loan: Not repaying the funds you borrowed by deadlines. Never do this because the government always know!
Car and mortgages you can default on. It will leave a mark on your credit report for some years, but eventually you can move on
Problem with for-profit collges:
Maximize money and student body
So students take out loans, but don’t graduate and end up in huge amount of debt, so this is the reason schools must show grad rates
but of course getting rid of for-profit schools is not the end-be solution
What are the two implications for policy markers for improving disclosures
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
Policymakers need to consider how to provide education and information during earlier stages and not just at the point of disclosure in the final stage of the decision
Full understanding of disclosure not necessary. Consumers can still make an optimal choice for their situaiton. Reduces importance of measuring understanding during disclosure testing.
The Last Mile by Dilip Soman: What were his 5 takeways about ___?
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
His takeaways for implementing disclosures irl:
Simple: cannot be overwhelming and must be straightforward
Comprehensive: need to tell all important info
Relevant to person making decision
Stages (just in time)
Segmented: break up info so related info is together and more digestable
White House College Scorecard: The four sections and what they mean
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
Costs:
provides relative costs to other unis
provides H/M/L costs and borrowing amounts
Graduation Rates: entire uni not by major though
Loan default Rate
Median borrowing:
measured in absolute dollars
CFPB Shopping Sheet: Three main parts of shopping sheet
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
A tool developed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to help students compare financial aid offers. It aims to simplify the decision-making process regarding loans and expenses.
Costs in the school year and its breakdown
Grants and scholarships to pay for college
What will you pay for colleges (net costs which is cost of attendance minus total grants and scholarships)
Very similar to White House scorecard
TILA RESPA Disclosure (Truth-In-Lending Disclosure Statement) and important temrs
APR
Amount Financed (Third Box)
It’s issue
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
A disclosure that combines information from the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) to inform borrowers of key financial details about a mortgage loan, including interest rates, payment schedules, and estimated closing costs. Standard form for many loans.
An issue is that annual percentage rate is perceived as most important and most shocking! (The first box), but in reality what you should be focused on is monthly payments, and can these payments change so we should focus on APR instead
Adjustable rate mortgage (ARM), APR
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
A type of mortgage where the interest rate can change periodically based on fluctuations in a corresponding financial index. This can result in lower initial payments compared to fixed-rate mortgages, but the monthly payments may increase over time. Tells you if & how much monthly payments change
Mortgage disclosure should show that mortgage is ARM and its APR. And also do a comparison to show if its a good or bad rate.
Overdraft Coverage
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
allows banks to temporarily cover a transaction that withdraws more than the balance of checking account and leave it negative. So then later a customer is required to repay the expense along with associated overdraft fees (like a loan)
Comprise over 50% of net fees consumer paid on their check accounts!
Disclosure Solution for Overdraft Coverage, and then how it lowkey doesn’t work sometimes
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
Federal regulations now require that financial institutions gain consumers’ affirmative consent (“opt in”) for overdraft fees on non-recurring debt card transactions and ATM withdrawals.
But now firms try to advertise overdraft fees as exciting and omg you don’t want to miss it guys!!! fo sure!
Testing Overdraft Disclosure Forms + Version 2 with Salience and Mapping
Module 3 Lecture 3: Financial Decisions
Testing three different forms on overdraft fees (Model Form A-9 the standard, Comparison form (two column format), Example form)
Measures: coverage decisions, decision time, and comprehension
The results showed no significant difference between forms on overall comprehension. But redesign formed did improve knowledge about default choice. (so they actively chose to opt-in or out, instead of just being like eh whatever ill just choose the default choice)
so while people to appear relatively knowledgeable, in aggregate, about how attributes should be weighted, so personal factors sometimes weight much more than product features!!
Version 2 did salience (personal decisions in this) and mapping (show how personal factors could affect preferences). But instead no difference in decision time or overall comprehension, although higher decision confidence.
Behavioral Finance and the Stock Market
Security prices are highly correlated with intrinsic value, but sometimes diverge to a significant degree
It is possible to predict stock prices just not very precise
Taxes: what it is, what is taxes witheld, what to people tend to do
Taxes are witheld from paycheck. You choose how much get withheld. When tax days come along (April every year), if you withheld too much, you get money back. If you withheld too little, you write a check to the gov.
What people do? 80% of taxpayers overwithhold because we hate the idea of owning money. Loss aversion: writing the check feels a lot worse than getting money back.
Sales Tax Holiday (what is it, what is the trick)
A weekend where you don’t pay sales tax. Stores pay the taxes out of their own profits. However, stores usually just increase the normal price to adjust for this.
Effect from Signing things
you’re more likely to be honest
Credit Cards what is the best repayment strategy
Say you have balances on multiple credit cards, what do you do with…
an emotional perspective?
a financial perspective?
Paying the full balance each month to avoid interest and build good credit.
Emotional perspective: pay off faster with a debt snowball. You pay the smallest balance first and gain momentum
Financial Perspective: Pay off the credit card with the highest interest rate
New York Cabbies and Credit Cards
At first cabby drivers preferred cash because it was harder to track than credit cards. there was more cash under the table.
but later on, credit card readers have tip screens pop up, which caused cabbies to get better tips. The reason why more people tip is because they are influenced by the default (the default is to tip)
Disposition Effect:
Home owners reluctant to sell at a loss
Anchoring
buyers anchor on the housing prices o the city they are moving from
so that’s why when you first move to a new place, make sure you stay there for a while to get used to the new housing prices!
Study on Savings: Temporal Reframing
Had three saving options for 401(k):
save $5 per day
save $35 per week
save $150 per month
All groups (high and low income) prefer $5 per day. Taking big amounts of money and chunking into more affordable amounts is good.
Study on Reframing Metrics of Savings
Between % savings and “pennies on the dollar” savings
PPL w/ higher incomes save a little bit more when asked about % (but basically equal)
PPL w/ lower incomes save much more when asked about pennies
of course in absolute terms, higher income will accept higher savings rates
Study on Savings Nudge: Automatic Enrollement
Firms changed default. Participants are enrolled into the 401(k) plan unless they explicitly opt out (framing effect). Enrollment increased dramatically.
If you precommit, more likely to do it in the future. If you just say you will save, most likely you end up not doing it.
Illusion of wealth for retirement savings
If you use lump sums, those numbers seem larger and more appropiate for lower wealth amounts, which can confuse alot of people on how much to save in retirement funds.
Breaking down the lump sums into monly income gives ppl a better idea of if they have enough money.
Investing: Confirmation bias when online
Barber & Odean 2001
401k plans with web-based interfaces, turnover increases by 50%
but these online forums and discussions lead to confirmation bias regarding investing. Ppl convince each other online to do stuff leading to an echo chamber. More overconfident and trade more actively and speculatively, earning lower returns.
Warren Buffet Quote
If you have a hypothesis, you need to write down the contrary to that hypothesis. Running list of procs and cons. Otherwise, your brain will focus on your appealing side and you have confirmation bias.
What are the psychological challenges in decumulation (spending wisely in retirement)
Every individual’s situation is different
Large Stakes (often million of dollars)
Limited Opportunities to Learn (only get one shot)
Multiple Sources of uncertainty (i.e: life expectancy)
Effects of decisions last for long time periods
Difficult emotional tradeoffs
What are the psychological influences on decumulation
self-control: enjoy now or save for later?
impatience: discounting of future outcomes
psychological ownership/endowment effect: overvalue the things you own
loss aversion, especially for annuities
annuity: contract between you and insurance company that requires insurer to make payments to you
biases in prediction: uncertainty in longevity, health, etc
fairness and trust: do i trust company that’s holding onto my money during retirement and gov?
Subjective Life Expectations Task: Live-to or Die-by
% Chance you live to 75? (higher)
Die by 75? (lower)
10 year age gap between median expect age of death. So want ppl to make good retirement decisions, ask about living to 75 bc ppl tend to be more optimistic about how long they’ll live and they will realize that they should save more
What are the two retirement income options?
Single Life Annuities and Social Security
Life Annuities: What Economists think, what really happens?
LIfe annuity: take chunk of your savings, insurance company will give you guaranteed income for the rest of your life. so you would prefer to live longer than shorter to reap benefits of this insurance
Economics think life annuities should be an attack solution for more retirees, but only 1-6% of retirees buy them.
Why do people not buy them?
Social norms: nobody else is doing it
Feeling like there’s a loss: its unfair, especially if u die early and having very high savings