Ap gov court cases

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 4:00 PM on 1/29/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

10 Terms

1
New cards

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

clause: Article III – Judicial Power. Was appointed a federal judge, but his commission was not delivered. He sued to force delivery. The case asked whether the Supreme Court could issue a writ of mandamus to compel the executive branch.

2
New cards

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

xxxxx attempted to tax the Second Bank of the United States. Could Congress create the bank, and could a state tax a federal institution?

clause: Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8)

3
New cards

Schenck v. United States (1919)

Issue: Charles distributed leaflets urging opposition to the draft during World War I. Was this protected under the First Amendment?
Clause: First Amendment – Free Speech
Ruling: The Court ruled that speech that creates a “clear and present danger” to national security is not protected. This limited free speech during wartime, introducing a standard to balance freedom of speech and public safety.

4
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Issue: Were racial segregation laws in public schools constitutional under the Equal Protection Clause?
Clause: 14th Amendment – Equal Protection Clause
Ruling: The Court unanimously declared that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal, overturning Plessy v. Ferguson. This ruling ended legal segregation in public schools and became a major victory of the Civil Rights Movement.

5
New cards

Baker v. Carr (1962)

Issue: Tennessee’s legislative districts had not been redrawn in decades despite population shifts. Could federal courts intervene in state redistricting issues?
Clause: 14th Amendment – Equal Protection Clause
Ruling: The Court held that redistricting cases are justiciable, meaning courts can hear them. This led to the principle of “one person, one vote”, ensuring legislative districts reflect equal representation.

6
New cards

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

Issue: New York schools had a voluntary, nondenominational prayer at the start of each day. Did this violate the Constitution?
Clause: First Amendment – Establishment Clause
Ruling: Yes. Even if voluntary and non-denominational, school-sponsored prayer is unconstitutional, reinforcing the separation of church and state.

7
New cards

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

Issue: Clarence was denied a lawyer in a Florida state trial because he could not afford one. Does the Sixth Amendment require states to provide legal counsel?
Clauses:

  • Sixth Amendment – Right to Counsel

  • 14th Amendment – Due Process Clause (Incorporation)
    Ruling: Yes. The Court ruled that states must provide an attorney to defendants who cannot afford one, applying the Sixth Amendment to the states through the 14th Amendment.

8
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

Issue: Students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. Could the school punish them?
Clause: First Amendment – Free Speech
Ruling: Students do not lose constitutional rights at school. Schools can limit speech only if it causes a substantial disruption. This case protected symbolic political expression in schools.

9
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

Issue: Amish parents refused to send their children to high school after 8th grade, citing religious beliefs. Could the state enforce compulsory education laws?
Clause: First Amendment – Free Exercise Clause
Ruling: The Court ruled that compulsory education laws violated the Amish families’ religious freedom. Individual religious rights can outweigh certain state interests.

10
New cards

United States v. Lopez (1995)

Issue: Congress passed the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. Did it exceed Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause?
Clause: Article I, Section 8 – Commerce Clause
Ruling: Yes. Carrying a gun near a school is not an economic activity affecting interstate commerce. This decision limited Congress’s power and reinforced federalism by protecting states’ authority.