AP Lang Fallacies/Syllogisms

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/19

flashcard set

Earn XP

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

Fallacy of Half Truth

All information is true, but some is left out

2
New cards

Fallacy of Non Sequiter

Conclusion with no connection to the argument

3
New cards

Fallacy of Faulty Generalization

Making a conclusion based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence

4
New cards

Fallacy of Post-Hoc

Assigning a false cause to an effect, ignoring any other possible causes

5
New cards

Fallacy of Slippery Slope

Assuming that a relatively small first step will inevitably lead to a chain of related events resulting in a significant impact.

6
New cards

Fallacy of Faulty Analogy

Drawing a comparison between two things ignoring the bigger disimilarities

7
New cards

Fallacy of Circular Reasoning

Using a conclusion as a premise, making the argument go in circles without providing actual evidence.

8
New cards

Fallacy of Ad-Homenim

Attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself.

9
New cards

Fallacy of Ad-Populum

Going along with something simply because others are

10
New cards

Fallacy of Red Herring

Introducing irrelevant information to distract from the main issue in an argument.

11
New cards

Fallacy of the Complex Question

Presenting a question in a way that no matter how the person answers they are incriminated

12
New cards

Fallacy of the Strawman

Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack.

13
New cards

Equivocation

Creating a 4th term in a syllogism

14
New cards

Undistributed Middle Term

The middle term for a syllogism is required to be distributed at least once

15
New cards

Illicit Process

In syllogisms, all terms that are distributed in the conclusion must be distributed in the premise

16
New cards

Extistential Fallacy

A syllogism can’t have two particulars as the premise

17
New cards

Fallacy of Conclusion from two negative premises

A syllogism cannot have both premises be negatives

18
New cards

Affirmative Conclusion

If a syllogism has one negative premises, it must lead to a negative conclusion.

19
New cards

Modus Poneus

Affirming the Antecedent

20
New cards

Modes Tullens

Rejecting the Consequent