1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Composition
Team size
Member ability
Member personality
Member roles
Member experiences/perspectives/knowledge
Diversity:Surface or Deep
Norms
Acceptable standards of behaviours within a group that are shared by the group’s members
Performance, school, allocation of roles and resources
Come from: explicit statements, critical events, initial patterns, carry-over
Team effectiveness
Facilitate the dynamic of the team, not dominate
Composition and process > quality of decision
Potential effectiveness (composition) - lost effectiveness (faulty process) > actual effectiveness
Teams should better than the average of their members, but sometimes they do worse
Conflict
Task conflict: teams need to argue about ideas
Interpersonal conflict: avoid interpersonal conflict during discussion
Role of devil’s advocate
Accountability
Social loafing → the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually
Diffusion of responsibility
Context in where everybody is working on the same thing
“Bystander effect”
Thinking others will handle the situation
Team decision making
Composition → knowledge, skills, perspective, experience
Process → differentiation, integration
Pros and Cons of Teams
Pros
More resources
Potential for higher quality, more creative solutions
Cons
More process issues
Potential for inefficiency, poorer decision quality and more member dissatisfaction
What should you ask yourself before working with a team?
Do you need one?
What should it look like?
Improve team process
Organizational culture
Shared social knowledge about rules, norms and values. Important for guiding members’ attitudes and behaviours
Person - organization fit
Where does the individual fit in?
Aspects of culture
Layers
Observable artifacts → visible and measurable aspects of culture
Espoused values and norms → rules of behaviours and values of what one believes in
Underlying assumptions
Types: Very many (ones in book are just examples - don’t need to know them)
Strength: Degree to which its shared → how much do the ppl in a group agree on the norms?
NOTE: a strong culture does not equate to positive ones (eg: there are groups where ppl think its acceptable to commit crimes)
Strategic Alignment
Culture Creation & Maintenance
Attraction-selection Attrition
Socialization
Symbolic actions
Shared organization stories
Leader Modeling
Attraction-selection attrition
Attracts certain ppl depending on a organization’s reputation
Selection based on fit/qualifications
Measurable, expertise and selection based on the ppl you have
Choosing to stay or leave depending on if you fit in the culture/environment or not
Socialization
Institutions/environments shaping one’s values
Socialized to adopt the norms/values of a company
Symbolic actions
Something that represents/communicates values
eg: logos, symbols and stories
Leader modeling
Leaders impacting others’ behaviours'
Influencing norms and values of your company