1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Austen (2001) on what is the duke
He is a strange puppeteer whose strange purpose drives events
Austen about the Duke & staying in power
The duke never really lets go of the reigns of influence
Critic the critic - austen
ehhhhhhh right saying his purpose drives events but I wouldn’t say he has influence - he is a catalyst to the events but doesn’t manipulate Isabella/angelo thatts an exploration of human nature
Gurr, 1977 on the Duke as a ruler
The duke starts and ends as a ruler
Devlin, 20th century - justice/mercy theme and Duke
The Duke paradoxically links the justice of Angelo’s punishment with mercy
Leah Marcus, double reading of M4M
M4M is double written - whilst the play may be propaganda for the state, it is possible to read the duke as manipulative - letting people scrutinise those in power (New historicist reading)
Smithers, 20th century, Duke’s motivation
The Duke’s ambiguous motives for putting Angelo in power are unambiguous manipulative stagecraft
Devlin, on the Duke & the proceedings of 5.1
We may question whether Duke is still the playwright (lost power) & instead manoeuvring Isabella into a position of choice
Devlin at the Duke and his big fat ego also Lucio
The Duke’s anger at lucio is motivated by pride (he interrupts the denouement as ‘planned’) - scripted
Quote from M4M from the Duke backing up that point
It may be right, but you are in the wrong to speak before your time. Proceed. / you were not bid to speak
A5S1 the Duke being a manipulative basard to angelo after friar reveals his prior engagement
Do you not smile at this, Lord Angelo?
A5S1 Duke calling out Angelo but highkey call is coming from inside the house??
The vanity of wretched fools
Devlin talking about the Duke’s direct attack on everyone & his dialogue
His dialogue in A5 shows the audience that opting out was irresponsible
What really breaks the battle in the final scene - what wins between justice and mercy (according to Devlin)
Lucio’s insolence, not truth/justice breaks the deadlock
Devlin does the duke actually resolve anything/is there any exposition
We should ask how much truth the Duke truly reveals in the final scene as he advises her to veil full purpose
Spencer on the ending/analysing duke
Trying to analyse the Duke’s character whilst ignoring his dramatic function stresses Isabella’s response.
Hazlitt criticising the Duke (1817)
He is more absorbed with his own plots & gravity (nosy shit) than anxious for the welfare of his state.
Critic / break down Hazlitt
The Duke is treating this whole thing like a thought experiment and toying with people’s emotions than actually fixing any problems - the whole play is Shakespeare’s experiment on the Whole
Schanzer 2 key quotes 1. actually glazing the duke and 2. talking about duke in ref. to all the other characters
DV has more lines than Isabella and Angelo combined
Isabella & Angelo are simply the Duke’s pawns
Critic the critic (Schanzer)
DV having more lines doesn’t necessarily mean he’s more powerful/drives the story and instead can be diminished to the duke being a vain egomaniac who loves the sound of his own voice
Bandbrook, 1941 puppeteer quote
The Duke is more than the average disguised puppetmaster
Schliener, 1982, critic that basically sums up how i feel about duke lol
He is an unpleasant busybody who flees responsibility in a world of salicious seediness
MY reading of the Duke - queer lens lol
By reading the Duke as gay, his vehement dislike for Lucio is explained/justified. As he is a firm denier of his homosexuality, he intends to close his script by marrying Isabella - the nearest available woman. Lucio’s unprecedented dialogue disrupts these proceedings and so Duke lashes out at him. Lucio is also one of the few characters who sees through the Duke - ironically toying w/ him (see if the duke was here bit) & so maybe read Lucio as seeing through his sexuality.
A1S1 Duke re. vienna adn theme of justice
Morality and Mercy in Vienna live in thy tongue and thy heart
A1S1 how the duke has left the laws in Vienna
We have strict statures like an overgrown lion in a cave that not goes out for prey
A1S3 the duke on balance, justice and mercy in vienna
Liberty plucks justice by the nose, The baby beats the nurse and quite athwart goes all decorum
A1S3 the Duke ironically talking about will happen when those at the top leave & the downfall of people in power - he is those guys
Hence we shall see if power changes purpose what our seemers be
A4S2 the duke defending angelo’s government???
His life is paralleled, even with stroke and line of his great justice
A5S1 namedrop from Duke of the playyyyy also formally condemning Angelo to death
An Angelo to a Claudio, death for death! Leisure answers leisure, .. and measure still for measure
Duke at the end basically saying hes vain & loves the people but he is out of touch and hasn’t kept up public appearances
I love the people, but do not like to stage me to their eyes
The Duke reflecting on what he’s done to society
Evil deeds have their permissive pass and not the punishment (he’s allowed a permissive society to flourish)
Duke saying its his fault for society… btu then saying he cares more what other poeple think and doesn’t want to be the bad guy for Vienna
Twas my fault to give the people scope, twould be my tyranny to strike and gall them for what I bid them do.
The duke being a misogynist to Marianna
Fond wretch
Dotty (2012) on the Duke & public perceptions
The Duke’s problem is that his authority is too dependant on the customs of popularity
A4S3 Duke in his soliloquy plotting his manipulation to Isabella (tell her that Claudio is dead so that when he tells her he’s alive shell be super happy)
I will keep her ignorant of her good to make her heavenly comforts of despair when it is least expected
Schlegel (1809) like the other sch guy similar view of Duke
He takes more pleasure in overhearing his subjects than governing them