Categorical and Propositional Logic

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/25

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

These flashcards cover key concepts and definitions from the lecture notes on categorical and propositional logic.

Last updated 8:30 PM on 11/19/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

26 Terms

1
New cards

Categorical Proposition

A simple proposition that asserts the relationship between two classes of objects or concepts.

2
New cards

Subject

The term being predicated in relation to another category or concept.

3
New cards

Predicate

The term that predicates (defines/describes) the subject.

4
New cards

Universal Affirmative

Form A: A categorical proposition stating that all members of a subject class are included in a predicate class.

5
New cards

Universal Negative

Form E: A categorical proposition stating that no members of a subject class are included in a predicate class.

6
New cards

Particular Affirmative

Form I: A categorical proposition stating that some members of a subject class are included in a predicate class.

7
New cards

Particular Negative

Form O: A categorical proposition stating that some members of a subject class are not included in a predicate class.

8
New cards

Quantity

The extent to which the subject class refers to all or some members in a categorical proposition.

9
New cards

Quality

The affirmative or negative character of a proposition.

10
New cards

Copula

A linking verb ('are' or 'are not') that connects the subject and predicate.

11
New cards

Existential Import

The concept that the truth value of a proposition depends on the existence of the things to which it refers.

12
New cards

Contradictories

Propositions that cannot both be true or both be false.

  • two propositions never share the same truth value.

13
New cards

Contraries

Pairs of propositions that cannot both be true but can both be false.

  • A and E can’t both be true but may both be false.

14
New cards

Subcontraries

Pairs of propositions that cannot both be false but can both be true.

  • I and O can’t both be false but may both be true

15
New cards

Subalterns

The relationship between a universal proposition and its corresponding particular proposition.

16
New cards

Categorical Syllogism

A deductive argument consisting of two premises and a conclusion, each being categorical propositions.

17
New cards

Major Term

The predicate in the conclusion of a categorical syllogism.

18
New cards

Minor Term

The subject in the conclusion of a categorical syllogism.

19
New cards

Middle Term

The term that connects the major and minor terms, appearing in both premises.

20
New cards

Mood and Figure

The mood is symbolized by the propositional forms, while the figure is determined by the position of the middle term in premises.

21
New cards

Propositional Logic

The logic of compound statements that focuses on propositions as its primary components.

22
New cards

Truth Functions

The relationships that determine the truth value of a compound statement based on its simple propositions.

23
New cards

Tautology

A statement that is always necessarily true.

24
New cards

Self-Contradiction

A statement that is always necessarily false.

25
New cards

Logical Equivalence

Two statements that have the same truth value in every scenario but not necessarily the same phrasing.

26
New cards

Square of Opposition

A graphical representation to highlight relationships between standard-form categorical propositions that differ in quality, quantity, or both.

  • Universal statements have a truth value, even if their subject class is empty.

  • Universal statements lack existential import: they can be framed as If-then statements.

  • Particular statements inherently have existential import.

<p><span style="background-color: transparent;"><span>A graphical representation to highlight relationships between standard-form categorical propositions that differ in quality, quantity, or both.</span></span></p><ul><li><p><span style="background-color: transparent;"><span>Universal statements have a truth value, even if their subject class is empty.</span></span></p></li><li><p><span style="background-color: transparent;"><span>Universal statements lack existential import: they can be framed as If-then statements.</span></span></p></li><li><p><span style="background-color: transparent;"><span>Particular statements inherently have existential import.</span></span></p></li></ul><p></p>

Explore top flashcards