1/40
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
why the Old and New Testaments need each other
shed light on each other; Old sets up categories necessary to know New (covenant, sin, Messiah) and New clarifies the shadows Old
meaning of the genealogy in Matthew 1
Jesus is the son of David, the culmination of those promises
summary of the Old Testament
God’s search for a faithful covenant partner
meaning of canon
a catalogue of books that tell us what to believe and how to behave (will likely be multiple-answer question)
recognizing vs. determining the canon
determining is creating the canon, taking a human document and making it divine - NO. But recognizing what is already divine!
implications of the canon
authority, unity, and diversity
genre of the gospels
bioi; history and theology
meaning of the gospels being history and theology
explains that Jesus died (history) and the significance of that (theology)
meaning of Matthew 19 and the rich young man
shows the law doesn’t save, but exposes the heart
how we interpret the gospels
trace the plot (analysis questions on plot structure) and providing an explanation for all the pieces
meaning of the prodigal son
focus on older brother as a rebuke of the hardened heart of the Pharisees
authorship of the gospels
technically anonymous, but we do know who wrote them
literary distinctive of Mattew
discourse (Sermon on the Mount, Olivet, etc.)
main theme of Matthew
Jesus is the Messiah, the son of David, who creates a people for Himself marked by true righteousness
nature of fulfillment in Matthew and the virgin birth
typological things in O.T.; narrative trajectories that have the Old looking forward in a particular direction
purpose of the Sermon on the Mount
to answer what true righteousness is
nature of true righteousness from Sermon on Mount
wholeness
problem of the Pharisees
hypocrites; cared more about looking righteous than about actually acting righteous
how Jesus fulfills the law
offering a new heart and teaching us what true righteousness looks like, but it doesn’t get rid of the Old Testament
events of the Olivet Discourse
destruction of the temple in 70 AD and the second coming
arguments for complex reading of Olivet Discourse
context (the questions they ask), temporal markers, and nature of apocalyptic language
nature of apocalyptic language
used in Old Testament to talk of political demise, so likely applies the same way here
the source of Mark’s Gospel
written by Mark but from Peter
literary features of Mark’s Gospel
Markan sandwiches (splits stories in two, adds one in middle; stories are to be read together) and literary real estate (pay attention to how much literary space is devoted to it)
main theme of Mark
Jesus is the Son of God, who gave His life as a ransom for many
how Mark communicates Jesus’ divinity
uses Old Testament prophecy of voice preparing the way; John the Baptist is preparing the way for Jesus
meaning of miracle in Mark 8
parallels disciples' journey of spiritual blindness into sight
how Mark communicates the theological purpose of Christ’s death
Lord’s Supper with blood of the covenant, veil in temple is torn, gives life as ransom for many and predicts his death 3 times; Jesus wasn’t here to solve an Earthly problem, but a spiritual one
authorship of Luke
Marcion, heretic outside church, even names him as the author. Internally, Acts uses first person plural for one of Paul’s companions and the sophistication of the Greek points to Luke, who was a doctor
literary features of Luke
parables and trip to Jerusalem
main theme of Luke
Jesus is the Savior of all people; rich and poor, Jew and Gentile, male and female, etc.
sub themes of Luke
Jesus and the Holy Spirit (temptation narrative), focus on disenfranchised, and connection with O.T.
purpose of parables
if you know you know, if you don’t you won’t; obscure the truth to those who don’t know it yet and clarify or make truths more potent for those that do know them
principles of parables
they’re stories, they speak to the context, they’re theology and not history, and have one main point
point of the rich man and lazarus
sufficiency of Scripture; the love of money that marks the Pharisees is indicative of a heart that won’t believe God regardless of what He does
literary features of John
different from synoptics, seven signs, prologue, high priestly prayer, long pieces of discourse (similar to Matthew)
main theme of John
Jesus is the divine Son incarnate and we must believe who He is to be saved
meaning of the Son of God
Jesus is God, but not the Father
purpose of John’s use of the Word
goes back to Old Testament, reinforcing Jesus as the agent of creation who reveals the Father; subverts the contemporary worldviews that saw the Word as an abstract idea of reason; LOOK INTO PHILO FOR THIS
nature of belief
condition for salvation; it comes from the Spirit, is preserved by God, and it must persevere
parts of plot structure
intro, rising action, climax, falling action, resolution