1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Brogden v Metropolitan Rail
Amending the contract B made a counter-offer. An order being was placed was acceptance by conduct.
Acceptance
Final and unconditional agreement to all the terms of the offer.
Entores v Miles Far East
Acceptance must be communicated
Yates v Pulleyn
Accepting by normal delivery when recorded/special delivery was requested, made no practical difference
Williams v Cawardine
even if doing for other reasons still entitled to the reward
R v Clarke
An offer cannot be accepted if not known of or if forgotten.Forgetting about the reward is the same as never having known of the reward.
Four ways of acceptance
Conduct
Positve act
By post
Electronic and other forms
Conduct
Acceptance can be waived either expressly or impliedely such as in Carlill
(Reveille v Anotech)
Felthouse v Bindley
Silence is not acceptance
Adams v Lindsell
Postal rule - acceptance takes place when posted
Post
The postal rules - acceptance takes place at the moment the letter is posted.
Postal rule only applies if:
Post is the usual or expected method of communication between the parties.
Henthorn v Fraser
Acceptance by post is reasonable if within the contemplation of the parties.
Re London and Northern Bank
The letter must be properly stamped and addressed.
Holwell v Hughes
Postal rule does not apply where acceptance will only take effect when it is communicated to the offeror is requested.
Household fire v grant
The postal rule applies even if the letter of acceptance is lost in the post / never arrives.
Electronic and other forms of communication
The principle is that acceptance takes place when the offeror is aware of the acceptance.
Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl
Acceptance - communication sent outside office hours is effective on the next business day.
The Brimnes
It is the recipient's responsibility to look for messages sent during office hours.
Thomas v BPE Solicitors
Acceptance communicated on a friday evening would be reasonably expected have been read.
Dealing with machines
The owner of a machine holds it ready to make an offer, the person buying from the machine accepts by activating it.
Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking
A machine is a standing offer that can be accepted by using it
Esso v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
Where a 'free gift' is offered when purchasing an item, it is the subject of a collateral contract (there is legal intent) and is accepted when the customers accepts the main contract - in this case by buying the petrol.
The Electronic Commerce Regulations 2002
Items on the Internet are an invitation to treat.