Results for "All Right"

Filters

Flashcards

ALL RIGHT PAI
Updated 28d ago
flashcards Flashcards (17)
| Eng | unit: 5.3 |
Updated 45d ago
flashcards Flashcards (24)
| Eng | unit: 5.2 |
Updated 45d ago
flashcards Flashcards (36)
| unit 4.3 |
Updated 46d ago
flashcards Flashcards (26)
All Right! unit 3
Updated 56d ago
flashcards Flashcards (122)
. The last experimental. So this is going to involve the event relationship to between more variables. And do much changing on manipulating one of the variables theries as you already talked about both designs. And then we record or collect data, what obser the change in the dependent variable that result from our manipulation of the. That's what we're looking at. We're moving and sh and manipulating one and seeing if it causes an effects or change in the other. That's what we're looking for. So have experimental research, we are looking for causation not just correlation. We're not just looking to see due to variables moved together. No, we're actually looking to see if we make a change in one variable, do we see a subsequent change in the other word? If we make another change in that variable, we shift it more, we change it fast. We take it away. Do we need a consequential change in the independent variableag yet, okay, you're able to shift and manipulate the independent variable and consistently see a change of the dependent variables, then you know you have causation, a change in one causes a change in the other. They've already kind of gone over this multiple things, so I will just briefly say this again, but you've got the independent variable dependent variable, the independent ones you what we're going to manipulate and change, whatever. that looks like. um at a very simple level of experimental research, you can have one level of your independent variable, and then nothing, right? You can have your experimental group and your controller. The group that gets the treatment, that group that does not. So that is your very basic experimental research where you just have two groups and one of them is to control groups. But even still, you should see a change in the depependent variable to the group that is receiving treatment and you should see no change for the group that is not receiving treatment, right? That would be causation. Now, of course, you can have multiple levels of the independent variable, we're not gonna get too much into that. In this course, um, but two is kind of the minimal, right? treatment, no truth, and then you can move beyond that. The dependent variable is the one that is being measured. It is hopefully changing. If you see no change in the dependent variable when you're making changes to the independent variable, you've got a big problem, right? That means that your independent variable that you manipulating actually has nothing to do with the behavior that you're trying to observe. It doesn't impact it at all, and you're going to have no results, no adjacent. It's very disappointing. It does happen. and it's disappointing, but not happen. Um, so it is the uh the outcome orependent measure. Now, something I briefly mentioned that I have gone too much into depth, yet are the confounding variables, so the confounding or they're also called you probably heard them called extraneous variables. These are other variables, other than your independent variables. So anything that is not your independent variable can be a confounding variable, and it can cause and change in the dependent variable if you have not accounted for and controls something that has to be at and avoid it at all costs. Let's say let's say we're doing a study and we are trying to decrease the amount of smoking individuals engage. Hi, so we're trying to help them. We're trying to decrease their smoking paper. And our treatment is going to be some sort of meditation and relaxation techniques that they can learn because of that is based on the research that people smoke war when they're experiencing higher levels of stress. So how can we decrease their stress? Let's teach them various coping mechanisms, deb breathing techniques, meditation techniques, other things that they can do to decrease their stress and hopefully have a decrease in theopy behavior. Okay, great. So we implement our treatment. But what if we forgot to ask participants? if any of them had gotten pug onto to the doctor recently and had some maybe vac about their health, if they received some not so great news about their health, could that be a variable that is intacting how much they decide to smoke after that document? Absute, right? The doctors that said, hey, you' lungs are not looking for good, or you've got something precursors to cancer, we're gonna have to run some tests. That type of news could certainly impact someone who's smoking and could result in a change in their smoking behavior, they might leave that doctor's office and go, okay, wow, I really need to stop smoking. But if we didn't ask them that, we don't know. We don't have that information. So, we've moved forward, we implement our procedure and our treatment, and theyreased their smoking and we go, wow, our treatment works really great. Look at all these people that stop smoking. But in fact, all those people went to the doctor got not so great, there was a decided to not smoke, regardless of whether or not you taught them had a meditate break, right? That is a confounding variable that will throw your data because you did not account for it. Whenever we're doing a study like that, on any type of addictive behaviors for illness, if you're doing a medication study, you have to ask all of those questions. You have to get all of that information up front, because those are come down in variables that can change the behavior that you did not account for and you are not manipulating or control. So now we can't make the claim that if we um, you know, give individuals, um different mechanisms to decrease their stress, it will decrease their snow people. We can't make that claim anymore because that's not what caused the meaning. Or at least we don't know for sure that that's what we're doing. So confoundingles are a big bump. we run into these a lot, and I will tell you that when we are designing a research study um when you're working in a lab and you're working with researchers, it is intimidating to bring a research project to the lab. I mean, I did it a lot inad school. We were required to do this. You have to do this when you're doing research, but you bring your research question and your proposal for how you're gonna run your study to the lab. you put it up there and literally everyone in the room writs it apart. Everyone sits there for an hour or two and says, what about this confounding birdle? What about this? Well, this one's gonna throw your data. Well, this one's not gonna work. Well, you have an accountant for this, they rip it apart. It doesn't feel great in the moment. However, that is how you identify all of the compounding variables and you find a way to account. so that you have good data in the end. It's very important piece of research and experimental research specifically. We do want to avoid them at all costs. Okay, so here's another example. Let's say a researcher investigate whether giving students more time to study, reduces their tests anxiety. Okay. What is going to be the dependent variable here? What are we measuring? What are we looking at? We wouldn't want to take it again. Test anxiety. levels of anxiety when you're taking a test, right? That's what we're measure. We're trying to change that, okay? So that's gonna be the behavior that we're looking at. What is the independent variable here? Time to set, the amount of time that you're set, whatever that may be, okay? So the DV is test anxiety or levels of anxiety will take the test whatever you will word that, that's what we're measuring. Am amount of study time is what we're looking at for the independent version. Now, when you're taking a test, there are multiple things that happen that have nothing to do, maybe, with the amount of time you study. Can we reduce test anxiety by making sure that you study at least a minimum amount of time? Yes, we can reduce your test anxiety a little bit. But there are also other factors that if we if I was running this study as an experimental research, not just as like the naturalistic observation in a classroom, like let's just see if we can help. If I was actually running an experimental res research that many things that I have to account for. I need to account for type of tests. What if I get half of my participants, the tests is the morning and half of my participants the test in the afternoon? That's the I founding variable. Maybe the students in the morning are more stressed out because they didn't have time to relax in the morning and get ready for this test that I'm about to do them yet. Right? They're getting ready, they're in traffic, they're driving here, trying to park and so and so forth. Yes, we might run into that in the afternoon, but you still have got more time in the day. to get ready for it. So that's a confounding marriage, time of test. Another confounding variable would be temperature in the room. If it's too cold or too hot, you've got one room that's hotter, one room that's colder. That can impact someone's test anxiety. When you're feeling anxious, if I'm sure everyone has felt that feeling at one point in their life, it doesn't feel great to then also be hot and sweat. It usually makes that anxiety a little bit worse. You start to feel kind ofustrophobic and you're like, I don't know what's going on. I'm getting really hot. I don't feel good, I'm getting kind of dizzy, like, and your anxiety skyrock. right? So, I wanna make sure that the temperature in my room every time participants are taking the test, it has to be exactly the same, or usually within a couple degrees of the temperature. Okay, so these are just a few examples I can go on and on about all of the things that would impact you while you're having an exam that would impact your test anxiety. I need to help for all of those things, and every participant in all of my different groups would all have to have the same things so that I can truly say it was the amount of set. and it wasn't possibly due to during the room, time of the test, the room that they're in, how close they're sitting to each other and so on. and and that and that's part of the roofing unit ofart process, right? If I came to my lab and just said, oh, I'm gonna do this. They're like, well, what else, what else are you controlling for? I'm like, nothing, you know,'ll be fine. They're gonna rivet apart, right? All of those confounding variables that we need to account for. Um, a study involved investigating how manipulating the accuracy with which feedback is delivered, affects a number of work tasks that can be completed by college. So this is essentially, say, a student is doing a work task, and if I give you no feedback on that, as to whether you're doing it track, if I give you feedback that is correct and it matches, I say, yes, that's correct. or if I give you wrong feedbacks. So that's what we're talking about when we were saying a different type of feedback on your ability to complete a task. So, what is the independent variable here? What are we manipulating? Yeah, that's hypo feedback, right? We're gonna change that. It's gonna be different. What's the dependent variable that we're measured? It's the behavior we're looking at here? Yeah. Uh, number of work task. Correct, yes. How many workops did they actually complete? Do they get more done when they're getting positive feedback? Do they get more done when they're getting no feedback at all? You probably don't get more done when they're getting negative. You back would probably be my hypothesis, but we're gonna look at them, right? We're gonna count how many tasks they get done based on the type of feedback that they are given. And then we see how this impact that dependent varies. How does that impact the behavior that they're engaging? So, there will be questions like this on these things. This is like a perfect example. It will be this exact one, I'll change the words I'll change a thing. And I'll ask you these questions. What is the independent? What is the dependent variable? And sometimes I'll put a confounding variable in there and I'll say like, identify the confounding variable. and you'll hopulate pick one of the choices. So very similar to what I've test questions would look like for something like that. But the good to be able to look at examples and pull these things up about. If you're in any type of research class, statistics class, you need to be able to have this very uh, you guys could go over these ones.. I'm not gonna keep going, but you get you get this. All right. So experiments typically involve two groups at a minimum, which I talked about already, but you're gonna have atom minimum, your control group, and your experimental. The control group is a group of participants that does not receive the treatment. No treatment. Okay. Um, you don't change it. You essentially just measure their behavior, but you don't expose them to anything. Um, so work tasks with the feedback, that would be the control group is no feedback, okay? So we just allow the students to complete tasks as they normally would, we do not interject, we do not give the feedback one way or another. We just sort of let them carry on with their day as they normally would and we count how many works how they could. Versus, the experimental group are the ones that are going to receive some type of treatment. Now, as I've said before, minimally, you've got one experiment group and your control but you can have multiple experimental groups and a controll. And so you can have two or three different types of feedback. Those would be your experimental groups, and you can still have a group that received no feedback. if we're looking at study fine with students, you can look at, you know, two hours, four hours, six hours a week. Those are your experimental groups. the other students, you would sort of just allow them to either or you would prevent them from studying at all, or you just would not manipulate the study time for them, you would allow them to study however long they normally do and have them report on. So you would just basically specify that this group did not have a controlled set amount of set, and then they would report on how many hours they affected. versus the other three experimental groups would have a set amount by the time that you're controlled. Okay. Here's a question, a clinical psychologist conducts a study that involves ten people. He thinks he can cure depression by giving his science a particular type of drug. So he prescribes the drugs and finds his 60 days later, all clients show fewer signs of depression, as the psychologist includes he has cured depression. So what's the problem? There's a lot of problems here, but like, what's the main simple problem with what we understand in this particular research research? What has not been done? Yes.... doesn't describe. There is no controller, right? Every single person got the drug. There's no control group. So how do you know that that drug improved their depression? If you do not have a control group, you have no comparison to make, the whole point of having a control group, the whole reason we do it is so that if the drug does work, let's say that the psychologist is correct, this drug works, it cures depression. If you have a controlled group, we have a group of participants who didn't get the dress, what should happen for them? is someone over here? I take a guy? What should happen for people who are naked? Is it control with this? What do you expect? Yes. Yes, they should save the same, right? They're not getting the drugs. So they shouldn't get better. And then the people in the experimental group who are getting the drug if the drug works, they should get better. And you have that comparison. You now you can definitively say, okay, look at all these people that did not get the drug in my control group, they didn't get any better. The symptoms of depression persisted. But look at all of my participants, my experimental your, we saw a significant improvement in depression symptoms. Okay, now maybe you have a plane. But if you give the drugs to every single person, you have nothing to compare. How do you know what your drug is not something else that you're their depression? Maybe a bunch of people were unemployed and during that time that they were given the drug, they got a job. Back didn't improve someone's levels of depression, especially if it's a situational depression. course, there's a depression that is biologically, you know, that's a different type of depression, but there's also situational depression. And if you have an accountant for every single situation that person is in, those are confounding variables that can impact in this case, levels of depression. Do you know how control group, you have nothing to compare. You cannot make this. big problem. can't rule out any other expavation. So that's why minimally we always have to have at least a control group and an experimental group. And as I said, you can have more than that, but the bare minimum requirement, no treatment, treatment, control group, experiment. So when we use, um control groups and experimental groups, individuals are randomly assigned to each group, and I've kind of talked about this a little bit that the need for this in order to make sure that the participants in each group represents the larger population. That's the, right? You're never going to be able to access the entire population. You're not going to be able to access every single person who's ever experienced depression or has symptoms of depression in a drug site. You're going to have to randomly assign participants to certain groups and hope that they represent the larger population of people that experience symptoms of depression, right? So that is the point of random assignment to different conditions. Usually, the experimenter, I mean, ideally, the experimenter doesn't even know who's in which group, in a drug study that is ideal. We call it a double blind assignment where the participant doesn't know if they're getting a drug or not and the experiments or also does't know if they're getting the drug or not. Why? Because bias can be introduced? If they're participant thinks they're getting the drug, um, they can have sort of placebo effects, right? If you've ever heard of that, the placebo effects, or they think they're getting better because they're underlyression, they're getting the drug. researchers can also treat participants differently based on if they know who is getting the drug and who's not, and that will impact the data that they're collecting on that person's behavior. So, ideally, like the perfect scenario, nobody knows what's going on. There's a lab that assigns the drug and puts it in an envelope and assigns names, randomly and they give the envelope to their researcher and there's a red pill and there's a blue pill, but the researcher doesn't know which one is which. One could be trained it, one could be placebo, we don't know, and that's very important, but kind of nobody knows what's going on. until the end. And that's how you get the best data. out of something like this. Now, group should be comparable to each other. um, they should be assigned to the group based on Chancel, essentially. Um, usually we use some sort of computer programming to randomly assign numbers, two people and then randomly assign those numbers into the groups that were trying to produce. This can be very difficult to do. The smaller your participant pool, in fact, the more impossible this gets. So that's why a lot of research studies try to get so many participants and absorbid an amount of participants, um or why you need to run several studies to build your participant pool, before you can make any sort of claim about your data. because the smaller you participant pool gets, the less representative of the population they will be. because you do need to think about things like, um intelligence or um education level personality type socioeconomic status, ethnicity, um, their income, there's so many things that you have to think about and a smaller you participant will gets, the less representative of all of these things it will be. And then we run into the problem that your participants didn't actually represent the larger population, and your data really only applies to that very small group, and it cannot be applied to the larger group, which is always the goal. The goal of research is to collect data with a smaller amount of people, but you hope that you can go and apply those kinds and those results to the larger population. If you are looking for a drug that cares depression, you want those results to be good and to be representative of the larger population so that you can then produce a drug that can be distributed to people who have symptoms of depression and it cures them, right? You don't only want that drug to work for 60 people that you ran the side with, and that's it. and it doesn't work for anyone else. So, random assignment does help with this, but also large participant groups are going to make sure or ensure that you have a representative family of the larger published. Okay. yeah. So some other important things we have to considerable we're running research. and just terms that you should be aware of, so a confederate is someone who is employed by the researcher or is a researcher themselves that is going to participate in the study and pretend to be a participant. So they're gonna essentially take part in the study. um, the participants will not know that that person is a confederate, obviously it's a secret, so this involves some level of deception, usually in the study that we have to present to our review board and make sure that all of that is okay. But when you use a confederate, it's usually because you are conducting a study that people know they're being observed, they're going to change their behavior. So that's why we have confederates. When I was in grad school, a a grad friend of mine, she was in a different lab, and I was helping with her study. She ran this really interesting study on graphic Ed, so people would eat very, very fast. And I'm not just talking like, you know, kind of fast. We're talking like a burrit that big, is gone in one minute or less, like gone. And so, like barely chewing their food, like, wrap it, rapid, you. And as you can expect, there is a lot of health concerns that come first. We had some children who were rabbit eaters in that study. um there was significant choking hazards that had already occurred with some of those personents because they're eating much too fast, too large in bites. Um, but before we could run our study with children, we had to make sure that it was safe and it was not going to impact them too greatly, so we ran it with college students here on campus. Um and when we first started running it, you realized very quickly that they knew they were being observed, and so they were slowing down their eating. They were still eating fast, but it wasn't quite as fast as they had reported in their interviews when we were trying to pull participants. So what did we do? We got conf better. So we had a sticker researcher in there. and we left, so we who were identified as the researchers, we were like, hey, um, we're gonna be back a little later, and we're just we're gonna ask for your report on how fast you ate, but we gotta go. We'll be back later. Maybe pizza in the middle of the room, help yourselves. And then we actually had another researcher in there who was a participant, but she was a confederate. And she had to eat with them, which was difficult because she had to eat very, very quickly, so that they didn't know that she was a confederate. But that is an example of what we would do. Now, she had a time where she had different time on her too, that she was like collecting data for certain people in different sessions, so we could get a truer representation of how fast those people ate and their behavior was a different because they didn't know that they were being observed. So that is a perfect example when we could use the compatory. Um, replication and I've already sort of talked about this before, but we always wanna ask if we can rep replicate the results that have been found. This is extremely important. Scientific understanding is based on the accumulation of knowledge. The more knowledge we have, the more data we have on a on a body of research, the greater our scientific understanding is of that res research, of that behavior, of that phenomenon or theory, or whatever it is that we're investigated, the more research we have, the better we understand it. Replication is foundational to science moving forward. If we adjust did research for the heck of it, just to entertain ourselves to stimulate our reins or whatever research we just want to do, it doesn't help science, it doesn't move us forward at all. We have to publish it and then other scientists, other researchers have to replicate it and move the science forward. It's an extremely important part of research and without it, it really would kind of be pointless to do research at all. The point is to accumulate the knowledge and move the science forward. I've gonna talk about briefly about significant outcomes. If you take a statistical course, they get into this in great detail. But whenever we're looking at data, we're looking for what is called significant outcomes, statistically significant differences. We're not just looking for minimal differences between our groups, between our control group and our experimentsal groups, or even between our different experimental groups, we're looking for significant changes. big changes, changes that make a difference in people's lives. and a difference in their behavior changes, not just very small minuscule differences that maybe we can kind of say, well, there's a slight change. No, there must be a statistically significant dip. Now, of course, that is determined by the statistical analysis that are run. um, or if you're doing a study that's sort of based on kind of like a real world problem, um, things like when we work with children with autism and things like that, um, or any individual with a developmental disability, we're looking for um learning outcomes, so do they make significant jumps in their learning outcomes or their development? E cognitive or physical development, right? So they need to be meaningful differences as, you know, we're not just looking for tinyunicule changes, we're looking for meaningful, statistically significant differences between our groups. Experimental bias is something we always have to be aware of, these are going to be factors that could impact your dependent variable, a bias from the researcher, a bias from the in from the first incipant. Those can impact the data that you get in the way that they be hidden um any expectations that you are the persistent have can surely impact how they are behaving. We always need to account for that and make sure that we're, you know, making sure that doesn't do. Well is a false treatment. I've already kind of mentioned this before, but we typically see this with any sort of drug study um, but it's just the no treatment. They're given a pill that doesn't have any chemical properties to it, so it shouldn't impact their um system.? So if it impacts them in any way? That's what we need when we say alpha seat. And then finally, I've also talked about this already, but double blind means both the experimenter and the person do not know who's receiving treatment and who's not. That is the ideal standard to lose a another one in experiment, nobody knows. And it prevents
Updated 85d ago
flashcards Flashcards (13)
Unidad 3 - Verbos
Updated 92d ago
flashcards Flashcards (17)
than that I'nique. I think I would write a name and we cross the rental for past at do period, so like, it is us out of taking off or dealing with all of the logistics, so far, um you are still kind of getting devil or have anything else to figure out on terms of uh, just a piece adistration, conferences, anything else, uh, as usual, um, just, act and lecture or send me an email there's a few little things that I still working out, but hopefully to get settled for all of you. Um, last thing you just wanna say, thank you for your first discussion of us. They were just like specialasure read and, like, showed me how many different ways you're all being with us novel uh, and I now I like, oh, I wish you had another hour. I'm talking with this one. keep talking about it? um but we'll definitely touch on one of the things that you read in your post. today and when, um next week we're moving on to another reading, but we'll have your first conferences and that'll be a chance to talk about that kid's reading by all that really everything that we've discussed so far, so pull on to you all of these ideas that you're having. Okay, um, so today, we're gonna be a no happening, we're gonna talk about some of theorical contacts that can have us understand passing, like what's happening in the novel. Uh, and then we're gonna die further into the text of acting of what Laren is doing with this concept ofaba. Um, first, I just wanted to briefly touch on something that Irene referended in the novel, but that in this outside, it'sersen, using a novel so it references Comicorn, a little piece of history. We have I read thinking at one point, when she's worrying about Claire and correct and she's becoming, uh, and the problem of playing becomes three of her husband Rob, said, what is Luc there? He, was under eight the eight, uh, at the time that Larson was writing, passing, the rhyler case was sort of like a recent new sensation or almost like a celebrity spectacle in New York City. um, and the reason that Irene refers to it in the novel is because of the he centered around a white man who is married to a black woman who could pass her wife. uh, and the question in the rhyment her face was was she has, or did her husband, in fact, already know that she would lack? Uh, I was had like a little brief synopsis of this thing, and they' li. uh up on my versus if you wanted to read more about this soon. a fascinating story. So, in 1921, a wealthy young white man named Kit Reinellander, met Alice Jones, who was working class an racial black women. Rein Linder, the ris guy only, did not like this relationship. the two elopes in 1924, and soon after, because Bryander was part of this aristocratic family, uh, the news paint it up and published a story titled Bradland's son, and Mary is the daughter of a color name. and this led to his father finding out about the marriage and forcing his son to file for an annullment, uh, and then there were all these purpose meetings that began. And in this suit, Kitinlanders side attempted to prove that Alice had to defauded Kit using sex to gain access to hisalth. And social position. um, and then this became, as I said, kind of a big news story and cultural identity that because the right of her family was sort of celebrated being of family and because there were so many intimate details here in the court in the news about their marriage and also about Alex, um and this currently pretty preceding into all. Alice, for her side, I had been single case. She admitted to be black and she insisted that Kip had been aware of it. um and in the end, some surprisingly for the moment of by the court decided in Alice's favor and three, that KI had actually known of her blackness all along, so he was not the victim of any thought. In this case, he was not at the woman who wasying about being white. It was her husband lying about his knowledge about it. And so this is like just another variation of all these birds, like convoluted situations that arose in the midst of the American conception with the color line with racial purity and with racial power. and this is like, you just like another piece of helpful background as we head back into the novel of our characters, um, in our case, player is passing the way, and her husband, John, as far as we know, up to a point, does not have any clue that clear is black. Um, and even though this is the setup, Larsen does something to sort of what, electrify us early on, when she sets the scene with strong balloon and drink the roof and the dressingla this web. Hello, was John's reading player. Um, and I' using that that meansalonate, he's using probably obviously a variation of a regial slarity and word, right? And so this immediately creates like, great confusion for Ine and perjury who are sitting there. uh, and Claire and quickly has to explain why husband is calling you that. Her black eyes let her down. Tell them here, why you call me eyes. The man chuckled, make up his eyes, not I madeless compelled acknowledgepleasantly. He explained, well, you see, it like this, when the first married she was white as well as white as a lily. But I did lay she's getting darker and darker. I tell her if she don't look out, she'll wake up one of these days and find she her and with Edward. Heared with laughter. Claire' ringing bell light laughing his then a little later on. My goodness Jack, what difference would it make it after all these years, you were to find out that I was more than she present color. The put out his hand and refudiating flame definite and final. Oh, no, he declared, nothing like that with me. I know you known, so far right, you can get that slack as you please as far as I concerned, since I know you no. I draw the line back, the open pen words in my family ever happen and never will. Okay, how does our protagonist Irene experience this scene and how does she feel watching it? Yes.. There's. I couldn't. She's sitting at the TV party, you just kind of watching me not even even a while, put the most. But I it upset me, she doesn't know if she can speak up without real very nature. Yes, so she's like having to her appearance, like like looking around and deep confusion and disments. down because like the translated almost like half rest and comments that Cla Gertrude pick up on because the three of them are passing, and you can kind of tell that Claire has a lost experience with it has a conversation because she had she handles it a lot better than Irene does, um, and yeah, if you see all this in totalal turmoil and it keeps out a little bit in intercom conversations. Yes, right, so you trying to be her cool, but they're always like it is irrepressibleomas the sense of way, what the hell is happening here in player like aA... Claire husband to explain why would she bring up that conversation in the I? If she, oh, my husband has absolutely no idea. just for me.ger to know that idea. Why folks think? Why? Why will 30 this? There so many different ideas? few folks in the French? What are you things are? why in the read I Pandora. And all the soation and friends or what we actually. there' exposition to us a reader and to having. Yes, okay, so right, so she's like doing this like to them, like, there is there is a context here for this. Okay, there's a lot of kids and I go, here, here, maybe just go there.. as well. I is trying up all theoth or like making joke from the. because people aren has that beatified for her because she spent all this time for this performance and. And now she does advantage of this route. she work in. Yes. making a joke of her husband, right? why would she create this situation to begin with? so there's a way in which, like, there are different audiences and she created an audience to watch it un full.. sounds like, I g said, oh, you should spot, you know, uh, fire, you layer in my one pass the approaches it is like, you know, those, you don't know, but whatever really you can dola is, so it's like almost like red flag or alarms or something like battery knock and probably at me like, oh my God, like they kind of like on the closed and like my love. They're like email and they like not, everything that happens to Claire because they share this identity, that it's all black men who are can't ask for life, like anything that happening, it is like, immediately there's an implication of what this means for the other in characters. Yes. all this field are sheets like player? because um, like the she wants sitting for a her, our players trying for. and the other player wants to like more hard I his life. um, and it it feels like he's like giving a little taste like this is time, whatever med. So, like, why don't you let me your like a little more psychling real life? Yes, right, so there in which, like, maybe she showing up and like, making a joke at these I' heard a thing that there's another way she's like look at my situation, like this I live in I, uh, but it's both, right, at the same time... This is my back that. I contin what as I Yes, right. She's doing this like dance and shifting the position, uh, by by creating this and this is really dangerous essentially situation, um and and letting her friends in on it. Um, and there is this sense, right that there is, you know, danger in the scene, there is ultimately something that disturbing, but one of the involved is that I may not progress is like this this knowing lap, right? that kind of comes over earth room too, um, because there's something absurd about watching the scene, um, at one point, like Irene's lips trembled almost arm full of, but she made a desperate effort to fight after disastrider laugh and succeeded, um, and then jumped down a little bit, she's looking at her from grocery clear littleressed down a for a. I mean wish there was brief size through she feared by her self comprolled thatiled toridge for her notating anger and in that indignation. So there's like laughter and there's anger and indignation. She had a weepingiety to shout at the manip her and you're sitting here surrounded by three black devils during the teeth. So it does seem, right? that there's a joke and on notolute. He is awake and he is so sure that he would never have a black person in his family or in his house, but in reality, he is sitting there and has a black life, he has the black daughter, and there are two other black men sitting in the are and yet, they all of these women that are just referred to, player, Irene, recru, and and Claara Marjorie, all look white. How are they black? you can turn off, right. Okay, so there's sense in which a appearance is not the only way in which raises being decided, right? That becomes very clear. You can look at way as player and somehow collect Yes. you know, like like slide when you have a conversation down with the blue and it said, like, oh, and players said, what I was large, you color. And he says, well, you know, like, that's not simply means I never not that. So it's not even having, like, that like, DNA more like, you know, that like, it's the not even like it's I I don't even know like what definition is anymore because documentaries is not about, you know, having the access here, you not having that, what countries like, oh, I don't care about how you look, I don't care about you know, what's what's your ancest, you like be somebody else and something like. Yeah, it's really confusing.ired it just that John Lulu by being away, he's so sure he would go, right? There was no way she was getting away with the one or two percent colors in this case, uh, right? Um, but something weird is going on with this definition. two are men and then weonse yet. I think we need lots of different maybe people compared to the John tell the version of of push of the media of excuses. So I think with the women is that someoundaries, here, um the and also I mean for help uh, like, that their response to the outage show and how Yeah, right there are like, so many different ways that race is playing has an identity, but also have like a legal construction and also as a maybe like cartoon characteristic of what blackness is.. I don't know for what like one rule decide, um, who who wasn't? One, but under the law, there was the more, where ne the color lion have already in identities that forces you into one or the other. Yes, so this is exactly where we're headed. This is the streaming I understand, yet how he got to this place in the 1920s, where there are three white open women and all of them are apparently black. In the 1920s, this idea that right even just a tiny percentage of black ancestry made a person black um was part of a law, right? So that is happening in all of these acts were regional integrity acts laws that are prostating American deceased, uh, including in 1984 in Virginia, uh laws like the Virginia racial Integrity act outlawedational marriage and defined a white person as someone who has no pri whatsoever of any one whether than not. Right? And what is that that talk about? Um, and then there are other laws that defined lackers that owned with any trace, right? It could be, 116, uh, a black ancestry remain on. At least kind of law were as they said, white friend across the US and they also extended our back into American history street, one of the first laws that to do this work of criminalizing racial effect on the marriage, uh and defining ways by this strange formula heredity was in 1652 in a specular event. Um we often think about race as something visible, and in any case, it was a uh, but here, right we're seeing that the in terms of the law, uh, we'reology with very technical, legal, and then often invisible ideas of race and of blackness. My question is, and this has already come out a little bit irresponses, but why would Americans come up with such a thing convoluted and frame and specific and some type invisible concepts of race? I? Okay, this is funny back to Elizabeth comment, right? This has to do with the history of Americans labvery. So to answer the session, we're going on a little detour as we as do, as that how my minders. Um, we're going to go back a little bit and think about American slavery and how it works as a racial and social system. Slavery created generations and generations of makes people because, despite all of this talk about the rigid color line, slaveholders systematically crossed. I said on Wednesday that Frosted season on Monday, that Crossing the color line, especially in terms of sexual relationships, what is dangerous and needed as that is true for lacking and sometimes for, and afterately we waited, put and did allwise really violently and systematically. What did this look like? In active events that slaveholders were continuallyaping and they sexual violence was an endemic feature of the system of American slavery. It was not a random event that I approved in some cases of kind. it was a structural part of the system of American slavery. And this kind of knew that sexual violence often led to the murder of a rac children. So when these children were born, they were not considered by their fathers to be their children, they were considered to be their properties, right? Because their mothers then laid those children were and his laid. So imagine as it is a you know, 300 plus year mystery of slavery at there time generations and generations of people who were enslaved and considered to be black, but who look more and more white. This can be really hard to visualize the fact because I need the race, like they shift in different comments, they' shipped at time, we have pretty visual idea of race in the present. Uh, but this these photos for me of us a little bit to understand this. um all of the children in these two photographs were bored into slavery and all of them are considered property and all of that were consideringat. But probably to our eyes, only one of these children as looks black. So when these image of showing us is, again, like a strangeness of racing America. It's really like the fiction of race, of problems of race. We have this idea of rigid color line and then we have this social world that totally always by it. It is like a central problemating America, and it is at part of our 20th as. But it is also at the heart of the first ever African American novelot. Closelle for private's daughter, and they are mostly life was published by a for Lady author William Wells Brown in the 1856, of Phil during safety. um, and it again, at the the first factor all, this very clearly had aitional novel. It's a novel, it's written, it's a perfect of showingagos sla reading the need to project. Uh, the fact that this is the first act there in novel is a good reminder for us that novels, whether they are written by our Americans or by other groups, have not really miss it. Novels are enired or so story different from the literature, how all existed, but novels did not become kind of a cohereric form of that are literature, uh of writing until about the 18th century in Western European culture and then they started to become a major feature of Western European culture, cultureuring art aircraft the 19th century. and writing novels have is like longer durraysans in which histori can take place, and there' group or multiple different kind of stories. This is not super important about us today we're gonna come back see the conduct a lot of this then. but uh this is an important for sit situation in the 20th century where novels aren't one important for getting this little detour we taking the 19th century. Okay. back tootap. Uh, what I said is for novel and it takes up this problem of race and the problem of passing as central issue. Um Some of you here a red hotels and you know that it's like, a very convoluted and melodramatic story. um so we're not gonna do aopsis of this if you're curious, go recoel. um, but it's not that if we' for our course. I just wanna briefly introduce you to a central character in enslaved woman name hotel. This isotel as sheears about your soul. The appearance of Plotel on oct in deep sensation amongst the crow. There she stood in the complexion as light as most of those who are waiting with the wish shouldn' not referisers. The auctionireized by saying that Miss Futel had been observed for the last because she was the most valuable. how much, generally? Well, we're m meant to understand here is that, first of all, the towels of white, that is that the hotel is specially valuable because she looks like, and third, that this value attached to looking weight is sexualized, right? We get this very congestive how less g with it. Um, and this idea that played women were lighter reflection, including white acting, had special sexual values, um, was, again, a feature of this is of American slavery. Because of her lacis and also the other values white and, uh, she is persecuted across this o, which leads to a fact and laborer. She attempts to esclavery, that she gets caught and rather than go back to her factors, she chooses to to wep off the bridge for herck. So this is an illustration of that. This is like hotels weep ack. What did you with this? You might be at the Dr. D NOR. This week in the context of hot is morally righteous, right? She sort of a thing here. The cause of her death is slavery and her choice to die is, as I said, morally righteous, because it's protesting againstly and that means that within the context of the 19th century acad abolitionist dog. Uh, we can get a little bit of this, um, just from the way that lay brown wrote this right. There's no hope for aake for her down the passage. Her resolution was taken. She clasped her hands convulsively and raised them as she, at the same time raised her eyes for its heaven and begged for that mercy and compassion there, which had been denied her on earth, and then, with a single bound, she vaulted over the railings of the bridge and subbed forever beneath the ways of the river, thus died lowau. Okay. So this is a little bit of backstory and literary history that's going to help us understand where we are in our novel and how it ends. And we'll just say briefly that this is not the only novel that our literature that keeps up these issues of acid um, where a lot of really important and central novels of early actingary literature that do this, asking is one of them and then we're gonna read another one about to meet laugh more. This is all behind Ella Larson as she writing happy, and she is engaging with this literary history, but she's also complicating the story, right? I read Redfield and Cla Henry are not martyr characters by any right, the problems that they have are not only caused by outside forces. They have also caused by an own desires and wait. So, rather than writing a novel where black womenomes sort of like the vehicles for explloring an issue like slavery or race or racism. Larsen makes race and racism and passing into a being able or even like a backdrop or exploring black women, and their interiority. and they are desired potentially needed their fear, their anger, and and then ultimately their violence. We see both of these characters, sorry out, but what they are to each other and stay the missions, right? I read in the black world, players in the white, but over time their divisions were like he in by one another. um, andir, at least from our perspective, is getting too close, right? Irene, um, on getting rid of player. So, how does this like, break down in start from thisantingopter in and we talked about on Monday, there's thisensive great attraction in the beginning atoration and the sense that Irene was kind of like, not resist the thrall of player, but at some point in the novel, I mean starts to feel differently, and she becomes ultimately to consumed by Claire as a problem. Where are some of the scen that we start to see this happen for uh yeah, where are some of the turning points in the novel where he gets this ri.t. and I think this happened like somebody to going out, like not a highly lot, but you laugh and youulated things how much else if they really doing without me without. I mean, she like, you know, she's so over on cat I, and then was. Yes, right. So, at some point around an invitation that she wasn't part of, Irene begins to believe that there's a fair. But she have evidence of this fair as what I agree, and then also, we have beers like, do we have of an affair, what what did you think about? like, the truth or reality of theear? I kind of interpreted Irena's a bit of an unreliable narrator. It felt like she was telling them story that had already happened. So maybe her act of the end of the novel influences how she's remembering things and trying to justify why she would have pushed a clear in the end. So she's looking at her while they laughed at each other, so that was a sign and when she's at the party and few kind of corroborates how she feels, you see a little bit more about unreliable narrator or what that means to feel? Um when they're presenting things with objective, but their emotions and personality are actually shaping, what what evidence that preventing you and what descriptors they're using?, that's a really good way of it, so we have she is she's basically our in the sense that like she's the as we've talked about, but the character of his perspective, we're really close to. um and we start to have a approx novel see that there is like a discrepancy between her internal thought process and what is available to us as what evidence of what's happening outside of her, um and so the more and more we start to see that, like we have a little bit alienated from Irene, uh, and so, right, the reality of any of her statements, um, have comes into some question. um, so we don't necessarily know what this affair was um, other than what Irene either think it was or justified the FDA. Yeah. kind of operating? he was maybe for a bit, but I think last class mentioned how she really called Claire beautiful. and how now is that Ryan is somewhat clear and not much evidence of a ware, but maybe if she was in his position, she would find clear in my so there is a question of like whose desire is actually at the center of this, right and Brian was kind of like taking the ball for things that are going on early player, and she's rejecting herself and she comes another very good as one way that we could be. northern hand.. I think like, in terms of like there being any evidence, the only thing that I kind of pull out was the fact that like, they kept going to like parties and stuff without Irene. So, like, if we are gonna give her some of the benefit of the doubt, there is that weird kind of tension that appears when, like, even when Irene is not interested in going, Brian and Claire are still going to these things and Claire spent a lot of time at their home, even when Irene isn't there. So I I do think that, like, yes, the evidence is very sparse, but I can understand how she comes to this conclusions given her perception of what's happening between them., right? There's a little bit Iree, but there is a general sense of what happened and how becomes greater and greater. Oh, I was gonna say uh the one we're being like a ton wild narrator, it's I think it's interesting that she's like totally certain and positive, that like it is happening and even one you trying to like, identify the evidence and she's like, oh, there is it really that much other than maybe I guess it Brian earlier in the all says he doesn't think Claire, is that all with that what I spot later, he's kind of let it sit. And then at the end he's obviously like very distressed. But I think the fact that she just totally dismisses the fact that like, there is't actually that much evidence and she still have certain positive speaks that kind of unreviability little bit.... We are less to one very like what is really at the part of this because what she's going on is maybe not sufficient to to clarify um the problem as she sees it. Um Okay, I have a little off track here in. more. tired until that like he's in very cold family. And so that for old vanity yet what and also afterwards, we can there for months and the right you're getting to look down here. like they there is reasonable doubt about this, and that is just like, I don't really powerful look back about as readers, because we are now we are psychological problems.. I'm not analyst. I remember what was talking about that we really do better and I with that best of families, but from reality having theirairs way of justifying that oh, I I have ruin in my husband life, but if lived in on I thought I commit to Asia, whoa, that's.. Right, okay, so Claire is the problem when they're marriedriage, they might have just had problems in the marriage.. I was a little bit crazy and controlling, especially in her husband, like infe. I' of admitting that the wrong husbandrop. And so I really felt that my. Yes, so great and all of these things are are created by Larson's writing, right? Larsen, who gives us this perspective of Irene, which at the beginning, we are sympathetic to, we we have no reason not to trust, and then she warped our character more and more, and they are all these like critical moments in which the the consciousness, the interiority by being starts to become a place that we has readers are not as comfortable being in, one of those things happens that some of you commented on at the party at Hughes, um, with the breaking of a tea. One is to look at this scene. So, you get a green right into itself, uh, and then let the break that happens in reality, a literal break. Her mental andvisible langu receive it right. What did it mean? How would it affect her in the voice? The voice? She had a surgery. It had been. feeling ofolute uninverted quality. Actually, she didn't have counted. She was to him only the mother of her s of his son. That was all. alone, she was not worse than obstacle. Rage boiled up in her. It was a slight crash on the floor at her feet laid as shadow cup. dark seeing guide the bright grubs, red, shad shock, went on. The fore hers doeta gathered up the white dragons. As from the distance, youword flip voice hanger, though he was she was aware somehow miraculously at the side. Sorry to apologize, that I pushed you. plenty of me. don't tell me it's priceless and you are placeable. It hurts, dear God, how they hurt, but she couldn't think of that nap. Okay, so I want you to tell me how the theme is playing out internally and externally, like, what's happening inside I readhe and then what's happening? between characters and the room and how is it that we're switching back and forth between the two? Like, what what characterizes the writing here were how many who comes sentence that woman over? Yeah. I like, we're getting a lot our head the sentences are we cur and so like we' physically very small uh, and then it was very well on the tiger and there committed. And then all of a sudden there playing actual different of external things that are hurring in the world like, you person it says it clear what it is says, uh, and I guess, but basically it's just written't.. This is like a breakdown of her internal world and we're getting into like short drag sentences. And the other thing like soued with the problem in your life that, like, you're not aware of what's happening with a person sitting next to you or of theity or like, maybe all like what you're teacher ising in front of the room, like, you have a really big problem going on. and so you're at your internal world and then something might happen and you are snackpped out of it and you're suddenly disoriented of like, oh, what's happening in front of me? You live next to me? The voice of Hugh sounds like it's far away, but miraculously he's right there. And so these are some of these moments where we start to say,Ine, is maybe not so reliable, Irene is high that. And then he makes his life kind of icy and cold and a little bit frightening turn in which describes the cuff. Didn't you notice that cup? Well, you're lucky it would be other saying thatcestors were charming conf own. Iotten how many thousands of years ago was that's brand on the ele has I had a little war history, it was brought marked by other. Oh, all right, the English be you call it the underback. I' coming to the fact that I' never figured out a way to get rid of it until about five minutes ago, I had an inspiration. I only had to break it and I was of it forever. So it simple and I never thought of it before. So, what do you hear in this explanation? that she's giving to you? Yeah. She's using the for more, so basicallyolve the way change. That.... getair is she gonna do something else, right? this year. like how comes up, right start everything is having over the course of a series of the conversation. There two other. I think representation of player and how I. I want to get rid of there, she talk about all. And kind of reverse, I think earlier to help when the teacup is, which could also refer to Claire's passing. um, and I' almost like that spoil the end. Yeah, this is foreshadowing for the end for when I bring them up, like cushing clear sort of out of the windowows, like killingberg. I thought this was kind of foreshadowing for that as well.. something for not made it the end, I apologize to you, but there's no real way to talk about this novel without talking about the ending. um, it will still be shocking when you read it if you haven't gotten there yet. And but we're gonna talk about the ending with the end of our time. Now, it all fells crashing gap. Remember in the beginning, we have Irene ascending to the top of the green end, we have all of this movement up there. and then at the very end, we have all of the charactersembled at the top of the building, and the revelation that clear and then passing, uh, because her husband, John Doulouse storms into the room. He says, so you're in Ed order to Dan Edward and his voice was a snarl, and a mode, an expression, of ray and the everything was in confusion. The man had sprread forward, police had lected between them and the blue. She said quickly, hereful, you're the only white man here. And the silver silver voice, as well as of her words was a warning. Players stood at the window as composed as an everyone were not staring at her and curiosity and li, as if the whole structure of their life were not high in practice and for her. She seemed u aware of any danger or uncaring. There was even a same smile on her full red lips and the under shining eyes. was that smile that maddened by reading, she ran across the room her coting with foccity and laid a hand on players of their arms, One thought was exper. She couldn't have Claire and repacified by the Lou. she couldn't have the free Before there stood John Lewis speechless now in his f neighbor, on them, the little hudd of other people and Ryan stepping out from among them. What happened next Irene never afterwards allowed her to remember, never clearly one moment there and then if, a vital flowing thing, like a flame of red and bold. the next, she was gone. There was a cast before and above it the sound not by human, like aast in abey, nig by God, big. Okay, women happened here? Do we have we have love closely and the list between the we know that our have not slow it all in high foot high is slowly evolving in matter, but also, ever since being do throughout the heat and how the sub is. So we don't know who she is. is in the D or is so overwhelmed over the ir culturer. We don't want it being claim to not of itself. I mean it is not on herself and she won't herself whatever, right? And then yet she has the softway face of right here that the service are about really high correct by, the whole forgery loving, loveliness, clear, Henry. How do we maybe think about this ending this ambiguity of the ending in relation to that story, that I go about? Like, what kind of ending did I show you there and what kind of ending is this for a character who kind of constituively is of the same type? That's almost for where I do all of really. It a position already had this plan place that ever found out she wanted to beency and she had to loseation. So this she she just. Okay, so there's medally in which this, like hotel is a lead to freo, we could say maybe this is like, right doing something in here, or it might be something up, other thoughts and thought and that. I when I was reading it awfully, okay, so what happens to her? Um, so we have final like multiple different athletes are basically the have on standard as like CN time. you have I just that at the end fire. I see the fire Yeah, I after this is a broad looking of uh this, she seems just so calm about whole situation so it be, you. It's and ambiguous. One person back. towards freedom because she get the bird can clear she a my knowledge, then she will be home free, but even when like, he did find out she still didn't really succeeded maybe she killed. Yeah, it's all right. So there's like, as opposed to a heroic ending, a morally righteous ending, we are left to wonder it where that her death by being pusbur over death, um the place that the lay right on the ground at the bottom of the sky creaper is like burt and a dark and wathering. um so again, we are not looking at stories that tell us a problem and a solution, we are staying inside of a problem. we are going to end. I want to just prepping for next week, we're shifting years and reading totally a very different kind of stories. But the thing that might help us make this week is to think about laughter in this novel, who is laughing because laughter is gonna be at the center of the that piece. Okay, that a all. Thank you. so much (copy) (copy)
Updated 110d ago
flashcards Flashcards (10)
than that I'nique. I think I would write a name and we cross the rental for past at do period, so like, it is us out of taking off or dealing with all of the logistics, so far, um you are still kind of getting devil or have anything else to figure out on terms of uh, just a piece adistration, conferences, anything else, uh, as usual, um, just, act and lecture or send me an email there's a few little things that I still working out, but hopefully to get settled for all of you. Um, last thing you just wanna say, thank you for your first discussion of us. They were just like specialasure read and, like, showed me how many different ways you're all being with us novel uh, and I now I like, oh, I wish you had another hour. I'm talking with this one. keep talking about it? um but we'll definitely touch on one of the things that you read in your post. today and when, um next week we're moving on to another reading, but we'll have your first conferences and that'll be a chance to talk about that kid's reading by all that really everything that we've discussed so far, so pull on to you all of these ideas that you're having. Okay, um, so today, we're gonna be a no happening, we're gonna talk about some of theorical contacts that can have us understand passing, like what's happening in the novel. Uh, and then we're gonna die further into the text of acting of what Laren is doing with this concept ofaba. Um, first, I just wanted to briefly touch on something that Irene referended in the novel, but that in this outside, it'sersen, using a novel so it references Comicorn, a little piece of history. We have I read thinking at one point, when she's worrying about Claire and correct and she's becoming, uh, and the problem of playing becomes three of her husband Rob, said, what is Luc there? He, was under eight the eight, uh, at the time that Larson was writing, passing, the rhyler case was sort of like a recent new sensation or almost like a celebrity spectacle in New York City. um, and the reason that Irene refers to it in the novel is because of the he centered around a white man who is married to a black woman who could pass her wife. uh, and the question in the rhyment her face was was she has, or did her husband, in fact, already know that she would lack? Uh, I was had like a little brief synopsis of this thing, and they' li. uh up on my versus if you wanted to read more about this soon. a fascinating story. So, in 1921, a wealthy young white man named Kit Reinellander, met Alice Jones, who was working class an racial black women. Rein Linder, the ris guy only, did not like this relationship. the two elopes in 1924, and soon after, because Bryander was part of this aristocratic family, uh, the news paint it up and published a story titled Bradland's son, and Mary is the daughter of a color name. and this led to his father finding out about the marriage and forcing his son to file for an annullment, uh, and then there were all these purpose meetings that began. And in this suit, Kitinlanders side attempted to prove that Alice had to defauded Kit using sex to gain access to hisalth. And social position. um, and then this became, as I said, kind of a big news story and cultural identity that because the right of her family was sort of celebrated being of family and because there were so many intimate details here in the court in the news about their marriage and also about Alex, um and this currently pretty preceding into all. Alice, for her side, I had been single case. She admitted to be black and she insisted that Kip had been aware of it. um and in the end, some surprisingly for the moment of by the court decided in Alice's favor and three, that KI had actually known of her blackness all along, so he was not the victim of any thought. In this case, he was not at the woman who wasying about being white. It was her husband lying about his knowledge about it. And so this is like just another variation of all these birds, like convoluted situations that arose in the midst of the American conception with the color line with racial purity and with racial power. and this is like, you just like another piece of helpful background as we head back into the novel of our characters, um, in our case, player is passing the way, and her husband, John, as far as we know, up to a point, does not have any clue that clear is black. Um, and even though this is the setup, Larsen does something to sort of what, electrify us early on, when she sets the scene with strong balloon and drink the roof and the dressingla this web. Hello, was John's reading player. Um, and I' using that that meansalonate, he's using probably obviously a variation of a regial slarity and word, right? And so this immediately creates like, great confusion for Ine and perjury who are sitting there. uh, and Claire and quickly has to explain why husband is calling you that. Her black eyes let her down. Tell them here, why you call me eyes. The man chuckled, make up his eyes, not I madeless compelled acknowledgepleasantly. He explained, well, you see, it like this, when the first married she was white as well as white as a lily. But I did lay she's getting darker and darker. I tell her if she don't look out, she'll wake up one of these days and find she her and with Edward. Heared with laughter. Claire' ringing bell light laughing his then a little later on. My goodness Jack, what difference would it make it after all these years, you were to find out that I was more than she present color. The put out his hand and refudiating flame definite and final. Oh, no, he declared, nothing like that with me. I know you known, so far right, you can get that slack as you please as far as I concerned, since I know you no. I draw the line back, the open pen words in my family ever happen and never will. Okay, how does our protagonist Irene experience this scene and how does she feel watching it? Yes.. There's. I couldn't. She's sitting at the TV party, you just kind of watching me not even even a while, put the most. But I it upset me, she doesn't know if she can speak up without real very nature. Yes, so she's like having to her appearance, like like looking around and deep confusion and disments. down because like the translated almost like half rest and comments that Cla Gertrude pick up on because the three of them are passing, and you can kind of tell that Claire has a lost experience with it has a conversation because she had she handles it a lot better than Irene does, um, and yeah, if you see all this in totalal turmoil and it keeps out a little bit in intercom conversations. Yes, right, so you trying to be her cool, but they're always like it is irrepressibleomas the sense of way, what the hell is happening here in player like aA... Claire husband to explain why would she bring up that conversation in the I? If she, oh, my husband has absolutely no idea. just for me.ger to know that idea. Why folks think? Why? Why will 30 this? There so many different ideas? few folks in the French? What are you things are? why in the read I Pandora. And all the soation and friends or what we actually. there' exposition to us a reader and to having. Yes, okay, so right, so she's like doing this like to them, like, there is there is a context here for this. Okay, there's a lot of kids and I go, here, here, maybe just go there.. as well. I is trying up all theoth or like making joke from the. because people aren has that beatified for her because she spent all this time for this performance and. And now she does advantage of this route. she work in. Yes. making a joke of her husband, right? why would she create this situation to begin with? so there's a way in which, like, there are different audiences and she created an audience to watch it un full.. sounds like, I g said, oh, you should spot, you know, uh, fire, you layer in my one pass the approaches it is like, you know, those, you don't know, but whatever really you can dola is, so it's like almost like red flag or alarms or something like battery knock and probably at me like, oh my God, like they kind of like on the closed and like my love. They're like email and they like not, everything that happens to Claire because they share this identity, that it's all black men who are can't ask for life, like anything that happening, it is like, immediately there's an implication of what this means for the other in characters. Yes. all this field are sheets like player? because um, like the she wants sitting for a her, our players trying for. and the other player wants to like more hard I his life. um, and it it feels like he's like giving a little taste like this is time, whatever med. So, like, why don't you let me your like a little more psychling real life? Yes, right, so there in which, like, maybe she showing up and like, making a joke at these I' heard a thing that there's another way she's like look at my situation, like this I live in I, uh, but it's both, right, at the same time... This is my back that. I contin what as I Yes, right. She's doing this like dance and shifting the position, uh, by by creating this and this is really dangerous essentially situation, um and and letting her friends in on it. Um, and there is this sense, right that there is, you know, danger in the scene, there is ultimately something that disturbing, but one of the involved is that I may not progress is like this this knowing lap, right? that kind of comes over earth room too, um, because there's something absurd about watching the scene, um, at one point, like Irene's lips trembled almost arm full of, but she made a desperate effort to fight after disastrider laugh and succeeded, um, and then jumped down a little bit, she's looking at her from grocery clear littleressed down a for a. I mean wish there was brief size through she feared by her self comprolled thatiled toridge for her notating anger and in that indignation. So there's like laughter and there's anger and indignation. She had a weepingiety to shout at the manip her and you're sitting here surrounded by three black devils during the teeth. So it does seem, right? that there's a joke and on notolute. He is awake and he is so sure that he would never have a black person in his family or in his house, but in reality, he is sitting there and has a black life, he has the black daughter, and there are two other black men sitting in the are and yet, they all of these women that are just referred to, player, Irene, recru, and and Claara Marjorie, all look white. How are they black? you can turn off, right. Okay, so there's sense in which a appearance is not the only way in which raises being decided, right? That becomes very clear. You can look at way as player and somehow collect Yes. you know, like like slide when you have a conversation down with the blue and it said, like, oh, and players said, what I was large, you color. And he says, well, you know, like, that's not simply means I never not that. So it's not even having, like, that like, DNA more like, you know, that like, it's the not even like it's I I don't even know like what definition is anymore because documentaries is not about, you know, having the access here, you not having that, what countries like, oh, I don't care about how you look, I don't care about you know, what's what's your ancest, you like be somebody else and something like. Yeah, it's really confusing.ired it just that John Lulu by being away, he's so sure he would go, right? There was no way she was getting away with the one or two percent colors in this case, uh, right? Um, but something weird is going on with this definition. two are men and then weonse yet. I think we need lots of different maybe people compared to the John tell the version of of push of the media of excuses. So I think with the women is that someoundaries, here, um the and also I mean for help uh, like, that their response to the outage show and how Yeah, right there are like, so many different ways that race is playing has an identity, but also have like a legal construction and also as a maybe like cartoon characteristic of what blackness is.. I don't know for what like one rule decide, um, who who wasn't? One, but under the law, there was the more, where ne the color lion have already in identities that forces you into one or the other. Yes, so this is exactly where we're headed. This is the streaming I understand, yet how he got to this place in the 1920s, where there are three white open women and all of them are apparently black. In the 1920s, this idea that right even just a tiny percentage of black ancestry made a person black um was part of a law, right? So that is happening in all of these acts were regional integrity acts laws that are prostating American deceased, uh, including in 1984 in Virginia, uh laws like the Virginia racial Integrity act outlawedational marriage and defined a white person as someone who has no pri whatsoever of any one whether than not. Right? And what is that that talk about? Um, and then there are other laws that defined lackers that owned with any trace, right? It could be, 116, uh, a black ancestry remain on. At least kind of law were as they said, white friend across the US and they also extended our back into American history street, one of the first laws that to do this work of criminalizing racial effect on the marriage, uh and defining ways by this strange formula heredity was in 1652 in a specular event. Um we often think about race as something visible, and in any case, it was a uh, but here, right we're seeing that the in terms of the law, uh, we'reology with very technical, legal, and then often invisible ideas of race and of blackness. My question is, and this has already come out a little bit irresponses, but why would Americans come up with such a thing convoluted and frame and specific and some type invisible concepts of race? I? Okay, this is funny back to Elizabeth comment, right? This has to do with the history of Americans labvery. So to answer the session, we're going on a little detour as we as do, as that how my minders. Um, we're going to go back a little bit and think about American slavery and how it works as a racial and social system. Slavery created generations and generations of makes people because, despite all of this talk about the rigid color line, slaveholders systematically crossed. I said on Wednesday that Frosted season on Monday, that Crossing the color line, especially in terms of sexual relationships, what is dangerous and needed as that is true for lacking and sometimes for, and afterately we waited, put and did allwise really violently and systematically. What did this look like? In active events that slaveholders were continuallyaping and they sexual violence was an endemic feature of the system of American slavery. It was not a random event that I approved in some cases of kind. it was a structural part of the system of American slavery. And this kind of knew that sexual violence often led to the murder of a rac children. So when these children were born, they were not considered by their fathers to be their children, they were considered to be their properties, right? Because their mothers then laid those children were and his laid. So imagine as it is a you know, 300 plus year mystery of slavery at there time generations and generations of people who were enslaved and considered to be black, but who look more and more white. This can be really hard to visualize the fact because I need the race, like they shift in different comments, they' shipped at time, we have pretty visual idea of race in the present. Uh, but this these photos for me of us a little bit to understand this. um all of the children in these two photographs were bored into slavery and all of them are considered property and all of that were consideringat. But probably to our eyes, only one of these children as looks black. So when these image of showing us is, again, like a strangeness of racing America. It's really like the fiction of race, of problems of race. We have this idea of rigid color line and then we have this social world that totally always by it. It is like a central problemating America, and it is at part of our 20th as. But it is also at the heart of the first ever African American novelot. Closelle for private's daughter, and they are mostly life was published by a for Lady author William Wells Brown in the 1856, of Phil during safety. um, and it again, at the the first factor all, this very clearly had aitional novel. It's a novel, it's written, it's a perfect of showingagos sla reading the need to project. Uh, the fact that this is the first act there in novel is a good reminder for us that novels, whether they are written by our Americans or by other groups, have not really miss it. Novels are enired or so story different from the literature, how all existed, but novels did not become kind of a cohereric form of that are literature, uh of writing until about the 18th century in Western European culture and then they started to become a major feature of Western European culture, cultureuring art aircraft the 19th century. and writing novels have is like longer durraysans in which histori can take place, and there' group or multiple different kind of stories. This is not super important about us today we're gonna come back see the conduct a lot of this then. but uh this is an important for sit situation in the 20th century where novels aren't one important for getting this little detour we taking the 19th century. Okay. back tootap. Uh, what I said is for novel and it takes up this problem of race and the problem of passing as central issue. Um Some of you here a red hotels and you know that it's like, a very convoluted and melodramatic story. um so we're not gonna do aopsis of this if you're curious, go recoel. um, but it's not that if we' for our course. I just wanna briefly introduce you to a central character in enslaved woman name hotel. This isotel as sheears about your soul. The appearance of Plotel on oct in deep sensation amongst the crow. There she stood in the complexion as light as most of those who are waiting with the wish shouldn' not referisers. The auctionireized by saying that Miss Futel had been observed for the last because she was the most valuable. how much, generally? Well, we're m meant to understand here is that, first of all, the towels of white, that is that the hotel is specially valuable because she looks like, and third, that this value attached to looking weight is sexualized, right? We get this very congestive how less g with it. Um, and this idea that played women were lighter reflection, including white acting, had special sexual values, um, was, again, a feature of this is of American slavery. Because of her lacis and also the other values white and, uh, she is persecuted across this o, which leads to a fact and laborer. She attempts to esclavery, that she gets caught and rather than go back to her factors, she chooses to to wep off the bridge for herck. So this is an illustration of that. This is like hotels weep ack. What did you with this? You might be at the Dr. D NOR. This week in the context of hot is morally righteous, right? She sort of a thing here. The cause of her death is slavery and her choice to die is, as I said, morally righteous, because it's protesting againstly and that means that within the context of the 19th century acad abolitionist dog. Uh, we can get a little bit of this, um, just from the way that lay brown wrote this right. There's no hope for aake for her down the passage. Her resolution was taken. She clasped her hands convulsively and raised them as she, at the same time raised her eyes for its heaven and begged for that mercy and compassion there, which had been denied her on earth, and then, with a single bound, she vaulted over the railings of the bridge and subbed forever beneath the ways of the river, thus died lowau. Okay. So this is a little bit of backstory and literary history that's going to help us understand where we are in our novel and how it ends. And we'll just say briefly that this is not the only novel that our literature that keeps up these issues of acid um, where a lot of really important and central novels of early actingary literature that do this, asking is one of them and then we're gonna read another one about to meet laugh more. This is all behind Ella Larson as she writing happy, and she is engaging with this literary history, but she's also complicating the story, right? I read Redfield and Cla Henry are not martyr characters by any right, the problems that they have are not only caused by outside forces. They have also caused by an own desires and wait. So, rather than writing a novel where black womenomes sort of like the vehicles for explloring an issue like slavery or race or racism. Larsen makes race and racism and passing into a being able or even like a backdrop or exploring black women, and their interiority. and they are desired potentially needed their fear, their anger, and and then ultimately their violence. We see both of these characters, sorry out, but what they are to each other and stay the missions, right? I read in the black world, players in the white, but over time their divisions were like he in by one another. um, andir, at least from our perspective, is getting too close, right? Irene, um, on getting rid of player. So, how does this like, break down in start from thisantingopter in and we talked about on Monday, there's thisensive great attraction in the beginning atoration and the sense that Irene was kind of like, not resist the thrall of player, but at some point in the novel, I mean starts to feel differently, and she becomes ultimately to consumed by Claire as a problem. Where are some of the scen that we start to see this happen for uh yeah, where are some of the turning points in the novel where he gets this ri.t. and I think this happened like somebody to going out, like not a highly lot, but you laugh and youulated things how much else if they really doing without me without. I mean, she like, you know, she's so over on cat I, and then was. Yes, right. So, at some point around an invitation that she wasn't part of, Irene begins to believe that there's a fair. But she have evidence of this fair as what I agree, and then also, we have beers like, do we have of an affair, what what did you think about? like, the truth or reality of theear? I kind of interpreted Irena's a bit of an unreliable narrator. It felt like she was telling them story that had already happened. So maybe her act of the end of the novel influences how she's remembering things and trying to justify why she would have pushed a clear in the end. So she's looking at her while they laughed at each other, so that was a sign and when she's at the party and few kind of corroborates how she feels, you see a little bit more about unreliable narrator or what that means to feel? Um when they're presenting things with objective, but their emotions and personality are actually shaping, what what evidence that preventing you and what descriptors they're using?, that's a really good way of it, so we have she is she's basically our in the sense that like she's the as we've talked about, but the character of his perspective, we're really close to. um and we start to have a approx novel see that there is like a discrepancy between her internal thought process and what is available to us as what evidence of what's happening outside of her, um and so the more and more we start to see that, like we have a little bit alienated from Irene, uh, and so, right, the reality of any of her statements, um, have comes into some question. um, so we don't necessarily know what this affair was um, other than what Irene either think it was or justified the FDA. Yeah. kind of operating? he was maybe for a bit, but I think last class mentioned how she really called Claire beautiful. and how now is that Ryan is somewhat clear and not much evidence of a ware, but maybe if she was in his position, she would find clear in my so there is a question of like whose desire is actually at the center of this, right and Brian was kind of like taking the ball for things that are going on early player, and she's rejecting herself and she comes another very good as one way that we could be. northern hand.. I think like, in terms of like there being any evidence, the only thing that I kind of pull out was the fact that like, they kept going to like parties and stuff without Irene. So, like, if we are gonna give her some of the benefit of the doubt, there is that weird kind of tension that appears when, like, even when Irene is not interested in going, Brian and Claire are still going to these things and Claire spent a lot of time at their home, even when Irene isn't there. So I I do think that, like, yes, the evidence is very sparse, but I can understand how she comes to this conclusions given her perception of what's happening between them., right? There's a little bit Iree, but there is a general sense of what happened and how becomes greater and greater. Oh, I was gonna say uh the one we're being like a ton wild narrator, it's I think it's interesting that she's like totally certain and positive, that like it is happening and even one you trying to like, identify the evidence and she's like, oh, there is it really that much other than maybe I guess it Brian earlier in the all says he doesn't think Claire, is that all with that what I spot later, he's kind of let it sit. And then at the end he's obviously like very distressed. But I think the fact that she just totally dismisses the fact that like, there is't actually that much evidence and she still have certain positive speaks that kind of unreviability little bit.... We are less to one very like what is really at the part of this because what she's going on is maybe not sufficient to to clarify um the problem as she sees it. Um Okay, I have a little off track here in. more. tired until that like he's in very cold family. And so that for old vanity yet what and also afterwards, we can there for months and the right you're getting to look down here. like they there is reasonable doubt about this, and that is just like, I don't really powerful look back about as readers, because we are now we are psychological problems.. I'm not analyst. I remember what was talking about that we really do better and I with that best of families, but from reality having theirairs way of justifying that oh, I I have ruin in my husband life, but if lived in on I thought I commit to Asia, whoa, that's.. Right, okay, so Claire is the problem when they're marriedriage, they might have just had problems in the marriage.. I was a little bit crazy and controlling, especially in her husband, like infe. I' of admitting that the wrong husbandrop. And so I really felt that my. Yes, so great and all of these things are are created by Larson's writing, right? Larsen, who gives us this perspective of Irene, which at the beginning, we are sympathetic to, we we have no reason not to trust, and then she warped our character more and more, and they are all these like critical moments in which the the consciousness, the interiority by being starts to become a place that we has readers are not as comfortable being in, one of those things happens that some of you commented on at the party at Hughes, um, with the breaking of a tea. One is to look at this scene. So, you get a green right into itself, uh, and then let the break that happens in reality, a literal break. Her mental andvisible langu receive it right. What did it mean? How would it affect her in the voice? The voice? She had a surgery. It had been. feeling ofolute uninverted quality. Actually, she didn't have counted. She was to him only the mother of her s of his son. That was all. alone, she was not worse than obstacle. Rage boiled up in her. It was a slight crash on the floor at her feet laid as shadow cup. dark seeing guide the bright grubs, red, shad shock, went on. The fore hers doeta gathered up the white dragons. As from the distance, youword flip voice hanger, though he was she was aware somehow miraculously at the side. Sorry to apologize, that I pushed you. plenty of me. don't tell me it's priceless and you are placeable. It hurts, dear God, how they hurt, but she couldn't think of that nap. Okay, so I want you to tell me how the theme is playing out internally and externally, like, what's happening inside I readhe and then what's happening? between characters and the room and how is it that we're switching back and forth between the two? Like, what what characterizes the writing here were how many who comes sentence that woman over? Yeah. I like, we're getting a lot our head the sentences are we cur and so like we' physically very small uh, and then it was very well on the tiger and there committed. And then all of a sudden there playing actual different of external things that are hurring in the world like, you person it says it clear what it is says, uh, and I guess, but basically it's just written't.. This is like a breakdown of her internal world and we're getting into like short drag sentences. And the other thing like soued with the problem in your life that, like, you're not aware of what's happening with a person sitting next to you or of theity or like, maybe all like what you're teacher ising in front of the room, like, you have a really big problem going on. and so you're at your internal world and then something might happen and you are snackpped out of it and you're suddenly disoriented of like, oh, what's happening in front of me? You live next to me? The voice of Hugh sounds like it's far away, but miraculously he's right there. And so these are some of these moments where we start to say,Ine, is maybe not so reliable, Irene is high that. And then he makes his life kind of icy and cold and a little bit frightening turn in which describes the cuff. Didn't you notice that cup? Well, you're lucky it would be other saying thatcestors were charming conf own. Iotten how many thousands of years ago was that's brand on the ele has I had a little war history, it was brought marked by other. Oh, all right, the English be you call it the underback. I' coming to the fact that I' never figured out a way to get rid of it until about five minutes ago, I had an inspiration. I only had to break it and I was of it forever. So it simple and I never thought of it before. So, what do you hear in this explanation? that she's giving to you? Yeah. She's using the for more, so basicallyolve the way change. That.... getair is she gonna do something else, right? this year. like how comes up, right start everything is having over the course of a series of the conversation. There two other. I think representation of player and how I. I want to get rid of there, she talk about all. And kind of reverse, I think earlier to help when the teacup is, which could also refer to Claire's passing. um, and I' almost like that spoil the end. Yeah, this is foreshadowing for the end for when I bring them up, like cushing clear sort of out of the windowows, like killingberg. I thought this was kind of foreshadowing for that as well.. something for not made it the end, I apologize to you, but there's no real way to talk about this novel without talking about the ending. um, it will still be shocking when you read it if you haven't gotten there yet. And but we're gonna talk about the ending with the end of our time. Now, it all fells crashing gap. Remember in the beginning, we have Irene ascending to the top of the green end, we have all of this movement up there. and then at the very end, we have all of the charactersembled at the top of the building, and the revelation that clear and then passing, uh, because her husband, John Doulouse storms into the room. He says, so you're in Ed order to Dan Edward and his voice was a snarl, and a mode, an expression, of ray and the everything was in confusion. The man had sprread forward, police had lected between them and the blue. She said quickly, hereful, you're the only white man here. And the silver silver voice, as well as of her words was a warning. Players stood at the window as composed as an everyone were not staring at her and curiosity and li, as if the whole structure of their life were not high in practice and for her. She seemed u aware of any danger or uncaring. There was even a same smile on her full red lips and the under shining eyes. was that smile that maddened by reading, she ran across the room her coting with foccity and laid a hand on players of their arms, One thought was exper. She couldn't have Claire and repacified by the Lou. she couldn't have the free Before there stood John Lewis speechless now in his f neighbor, on them, the little hudd of other people and Ryan stepping out from among them. What happened next Irene never afterwards allowed her to remember, never clearly one moment there and then if, a vital flowing thing, like a flame of red and bold. the next, she was gone. There was a cast before and above it the sound not by human, like aast in abey, nig by God, big. Okay, women happened here? Do we have we have love closely and the list between the we know that our have not slow it all in high foot high is slowly evolving in matter, but also, ever since being do throughout the heat and how the sub is. So we don't know who she is. is in the D or is so overwhelmed over the ir culturer. We don't want it being claim to not of itself. I mean it is not on herself and she won't herself whatever, right? And then yet she has the softway face of right here that the service are about really high correct by, the whole forgery loving, loveliness, clear, Henry. How do we maybe think about this ending this ambiguity of the ending in relation to that story, that I go about? Like, what kind of ending did I show you there and what kind of ending is this for a character who kind of constituively is of the same type? That's almost for where I do all of really. It a position already had this plan place that ever found out she wanted to beency and she had to loseation. So this she she just. Okay, so there's medally in which this, like hotel is a lead to freo, we could say maybe this is like, right doing something in here, or it might be something up, other thoughts and thought and that. I when I was reading it awfully, okay, so what happens to her? Um, so we have final like multiple different athletes are basically the have on standard as like CN time. you have I just that at the end fire. I see the fire Yeah, I after this is a broad looking of uh this, she seems just so calm about whole situation so it be, you. It's and ambiguous. One person back. towards freedom because she get the bird can clear she a my knowledge, then she will be home free, but even when like, he did find out she still didn't really succeeded maybe she killed. Yeah, it's all right. So there's like, as opposed to a heroic ending, a morally righteous ending, we are left to wonder it where that her death by being pusbur over death, um the place that the lay right on the ground at the bottom of the sky creaper is like burt and a dark and wathering. um so again, we are not looking at stories that tell us a problem and a solution, we are staying inside of a problem. we are going to end. I want to just prepping for next week, we're shifting years and reading totally a very different kind of stories. But the thing that might help us make this week is to think about laughter in this novel, who is laughing because laughter is gonna be at the center of the that piece. Okay, that a all. Thank you. so much (copy)
Updated 110d ago
flashcards Flashcards (10)
Math notes Look at angles for by two rays with the same endpoint Here's another way be sure the end point so when we draw the two rays we actually end up with an angle the section that between the two raises referred to as the interior of the angle and like inside and then I guess outer part would be the exterior of the egg rays that intersect at that common endpoint or refer to as the size of an angle is an angle has two side points at the two-way shares called the vertex so we have to contacts since the endpoint that is to raise share the two rays that make up the angle or the sides of the angle you have the interior because they referred to the interior points just be the points that are in between to raise and then the outer portion would be the exterior part of the angle and naming an angle there's a few different ways that we can do that I'm going to draw this diagram so just a little bit bigger but how we gain an angle first of all one way to name an angle is to use his vertex call this angle a symbol for angle basically just looks like an angle dangle the only time that you can use the vertex to maybe angle is if there's only one angle in the diagram that has angle a as it's vertex of if we took a look at a diagram like this here if I wanted you to name the large angle we could not call that angle P because technically there's actually three different angles in this diagram that have angled b as its vertex and this one there's only one angle so that's why we can use it to be aware of that we can't call any of these angles and will be so you don't know which angles that we're actually referring to another way to name an angle is if they give you some additional points when you put the angle symbol and we can name a point on one side of the angle name the vertex and then name a point on the other side so we can call this angle BAC it would be the same angle is angle c h so take a little bit of practice but looking at this angle sometimes people have trouble deciding which angle that we're actually dealing with sometimes it helps with you trace it to wear it the and then a and then see so that kind of helps us look at the angle that we're looking at for angle of see baby it's exact same angle so we can use the vertex to name an angle there's only one angle in the diagram that has that particular letter as his vertex we can use three letters where we name on one side the vertex has to be the middle letter and then the point on the other side and then in some cases they'll put a number and the interior of the angle there'll be no degree symbol but the reasonable looks like a little range of circle. no okay cuz remember there's three different angles in this diagram that for two other names for angle one we could call angle one angle JMK we could call it angle KMJ m so you could also call it angle km how about angle 2 what should we calling to KML or you can switch the order as well hey ml forget a point on one side vertex and then a point on the other side same thing as angle l m k alright questions on that all right the next part of this section deals with using a protractor to find the measure of an angle again we're generally not going to use a protractor you're going to just use information that we've learned in Geometry figure out measures of angles So eventually will make more sense when you get to some problems this protractor possible is very similar to the Brewer postulate basically set up a number line and I told us how to find the distance between two points on a number line so we know if we have two coordinates on a number line to find the distance is the absolute value of the difference of the coordinates we're kind of going to use that for hiding the measures of the angle in New Zealand protractor again this basically just sets up this ideal of chrome tractor I'm not sure how much experience you can with protractors just know that in a half circle we have 180 degrees so in a full circle we have 360 and on a protractor there's generally two sets of numbers so notice on the outside it goes from 0 to 180 and then on the inside it goes in the opposite direction where zero is on the right it goes to 0 to 180 it actually doesn't matter which set of numbers you use but you just have to be consistent in a given problem if you're using the outer set of numbers you have to use it to find the value of both rays. both parts very similar to finding the distance between two or vents on a number line you're going to take the absolute value of the difference of the coordinates so you're going to look to see where these Rays cross either just using the inside numbers or just the outside maybe you can decide and it's technically the absolute value of the difference of the coordinates now you work this out we should always be able to put zero on one ring which makes this kind of easy so zero if you notices on the inside here and this other Ray crosses at 125 before using the inside numbers maybe you want to make sure that you're consistent inside numbers so that is just 125 - 0 or 125 if you chose to use the outside numbers you would come up with the same answer for the outside numbers that would be 180 - 55 still comes out to be home in 25 Angle are those things are called Radiance you don't have to worry about that you can help her to retail now I talked about the fact that YouTube use a number inside the angle to name the angle but there's a little raise Circle and it's kind of hard to tell there's actually a little race Circle there we're not going to use that number to name the angle when we have that raised Circle that is the symbol for degrees so they're giving us the measure of this angle to be you will not use the 62 to detangle if you wanted to name this angle you have no choice to to call it angle a when they actually want you to find the measure of the angle they put a little m in front and that just stands for measure to measure of angle a is equal to 62 degrees all right? all right as far as new material that's all that I'm covered we're going to work on an
Updated 246d ago
flashcards Flashcards (6)
0.00
studied byStudied by 0 people