AP Psych units 2-3(Psychology's History and Approaches and Research Methods)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 4 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/112

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Psychology's History and Approaches and Research Methods

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

113 Terms

1
New cards

psychology

scientific study of behaviors and mental processes of humans and animals

2
New cards

critical thinking

examines assumptions and the source, discerns hidden biases, evaluates evidence, assesses conclusions

3
New cards

two early themes of prescientific psychology

mind-body existence debate and nature vs nurture

4
New cards

what did socrates and plato believe?

mind separate from body (continues after death), knowledge is innate → nature

5
New cards

What did Aristotle believe?

knowledge isn’t preexisting, it grows with experience → nurture

6
New cards

empiricism

knowledge comes from experience; observation, and experimentation enable scientific knowledge

observation and experimentation are essential for gaining scientific knowledge through direct experience

7
New cards

Rene Descartes

nature AND nurture, mind/body exist separately but communicate thru “nerves”, combines philosophy and psychology (dissected animals)

8
New cards

Francis Bacon

importance= common sense and experimenting → using experiments to challenge superstitions

9
New cards

John Locke

everyone born “blank slate”, nurture argument → we are who we are through experiences

10
New cards

phrenology

late 1800s, read personality based on head bumps, early precursor to neuroscience, Franz Joseph Gall

11
New cards

Father of Psychology

Wilhelm Wundt

12
New cards

What did Wilhelm Wundt do

1st psychological lab in germany, 1st psychological experiment (measuring perception of sound), beginning of 1st field structuralism through introspection

13
New cards

4 “old schools”

structuralism

functionalism

gestalt

psychoanalytic

14
New cards

who founded structuralism

Wilhelm Wundt

15
New cards

structuralism

breaking consciousness into parts and naming them *introspection

problem: relies on smart, verbal ppl to say feelings

16
New cards

introspection

process of looking inward to observe one’s own psychological processes

17
New cards

who founded functionalism?

William James

18
New cards

functionalism

consciousness is always changing so hard to break into parts, should look functions of our consciousness

19
New cards

gestalt

whole is different than sum of parts, look at whole and organizational processes of brain

20
New cards

who founded psychoanalytic perspective?

sigmund freud

21
New cards

psychoanalysis

emotional problems and abnormal behavior is a result of unconscious conflicts, emphasis on childhood, unconscious thoughts, defense mechanism, talk therapy, dream analysis

22
New cards

Mary whiton calkins

student of William James, took classes at harvard but couldn’t get degree, American Psychological Associations 1st female president

23
New cards

Margaret Floy Washburn

1st woman to earn PhD in Psych

24
New cards

Psychodynamic perspective

The theory that one’s past traumas and conflicts or past experiences influence their behavior/mental processes

25
New cards

psychodynamic people-thumb

Carl Jung, Alfred Alder, Erik Erikson

26
New cards

behaviorist perspective- middle

the idea that people accumulate experiences and behaviors through learning and through associations or rewards/punishments.

27
New cards

humanistic perspective- ring

The idea that all people are good and unique individuals who strive to be the best version of themselves

28
New cards

cognitive perspective- pointer

The idea that someone’s mental processes and internal feelings affect the way they think, communicate, and behave

29
New cards

biological perspective

The theory that some of one’s behavioral characteristics/mental processes are in their DNA and have been passed down through the genepool

30
New cards

evolutionary perspective- extra

The theory that someone’s behaviors/mental processes were once beneficial to survival and are still present in their genes today because they helped their ancestors survive

31
New cards

socio-cultural perspective- palm

The theory that one’s environment and culture around them heavily influences one’s behavior/mental processes.

32
New cards

basic research vs applied research

basic: increase scientific knowledge (7 perspectives)

applied: solve practical problems + assist people (subfields)

33
New cards

industrial organization subfield

improve life in workplace

34
New cards

human factors subfield

improve life in general

35
New cards

counseling- think mr kittridge

help clients address emotional, social, and physical stressors

36
New cards

clinical psychology

therapist, study of mental disorders

37
New cards

psychiatry

med school, can prescribe meds

38
New cards

confirmation bias- think hair brands

we look for info that supports our beliefs and ignore info that refutes it

39
New cards

anecdotal evidence

Evidence based on personal experiences or observations, lacking scientific testing

40
New cards

empirical evidence

Evidence obtained through direct observation, measurement, or experimentation. based on data not opinions

41
New cards

hindsight bias (I-knew-it-all-along phenomenon)

tendency to believe one would have foreseen it after learning an outcome

42
New cards

overconfidence

tendency to think we know more than we do

43
New cards

perceiving order in random events- think coin toss

tendency to think order isn’t random in events even though it is

44
New cards

inductive reasoning

start w/ observing/research, then come up with theory

45
New cards

deductive reasoning

start w/ theory, then do research

46
New cards

theory

explanation using evidence and principles that organize observations

47
New cards

hypothesis

testable prediction that uses operational definitions of each variable so that you can test the theory

48
New cards

operational definition- think examples in class

(distinguishes hypothesis from theory) → statement of exact procedures in research→ makes it testable and shows what they’re measuring

49
New cards

case study

descriptive technique in which one individual/group is studied in depth in the hope of revealing universal principles *atypical individual cases→misleading

50
New cards

naturalistic observation

descriptive technique of observing + recording behavior in naturally occurring situations without trying to manipulate/control the situation

studying ppl in natural environments

doesn’t explain behavior, describes it

51
New cards

survey

obtaining self-reported attitudes/nehaviors of particular group, usually by questioning or random sample of group

52
New cards

wording effect

changes of wording of questions → major effects

53
New cards

sampling bias

flawed sampling process that produces unrepresentative sample

54
New cards

population

all in group being studied from which samples may be drawn

55
New cards

random sample

sample fairly represents a population bc each member has equal chance of inclusion

*reduces chance of bias or confounding

56
New cards

validity

credibility

57
New cards

things needed in order to not have interferences with experiment

standardization- everyone has same experience, random assignment, control of researcher bias, demand characteristics/participant bias, and confounding variables

58
New cards

researcher bias

tendency for researchers to unknowingly influence results of experiment

59
New cards

Participant bias (demand characteristics)

subjects know they are being watched or recognize what experimenter is investigating

60
New cards

target population

who you want to study

61
New cards

self selected sampling

(volunteer)- can be biased because types of people not representative of everyone

62
New cards

opportunity sampling

convenience- can have underlying bias bc of location and people there

63
New cards

purposive

want specific group you can’t get with random

biased because not entirely representative of population bc not random

64
New cards

stratified

Radom samples of multiple groups

65
New cards

snowball

one person recruits ppl, they recruit others

biased bc not much variation

66
New cards

sampling

when researchers select a group to study

67
New cards

assignment

researchers decide which of their participants will be in each condition

68
New cards

descriptive research methods purpose

observe and record behavior

69
New cards

types of descriptive research methods

Observations, Interviews, Survey, Case Studies

70
New cards

how are descriptive research methods conducted?

case studies, naturalistic observations, surveys (nothing is manipulated)

71
New cards

naturalistic observations

observing ppl in natural only

72
New cards

laboratory observations- think chimps/kids

observations in highly controlled environments, each participant has highly similar experience (downside- not like real life)

73
New cards

reactivity

people know they’re in study so change behavior

74
New cards

covert observations- think “co-cover”

hidden/secret, ppl don’t know they’re being observed (benefit- no reactivity)

75
New cards

overt observations- think “o-open”

ppl know they’re being observed

76
New cards

participant observations- think mr Clarke

affects research could get more info

77
New cards

nonparticipant observations- think mr Woodward

doesn’t affect research, might not get as much info

78
New cards

unstructured interviews

no script, each is different

79
New cards

structured interviews

don’t deviate from script

80
New cards

semi-structured interviews- think dress up

w/ script but ask follow up ?s

81
New cards

focus groups

sparks ideas, efficient’ biased, can change answer to fit group

82
New cards

problems with interviews

reactivity, measuring self reports info, not behavior

83
New cards

longitudinal research

follow same group over time

84
New cards

cross-sectional research

comparisons @ single point in time- not same participants but more efficient

85
New cards

how can you do cause→effect

manipulate IV and have random assignment

86
New cards

field experiment

research method that uses some controlled elements of traditional lab experiments, but takes place in natural, real-world settings

87
New cards

quasi experiment

manipulate IV, NO random assignment

88
New cards

correlational studies- ex) video games/aggressive thinking

measuring relationship between 2 variables

no manipulated variable, no cause/effect, no random assignment

data comes from surveys, psychological tests, archival records, quasi experiments

89
New cards

positive correlation- ex) # of years in school/income

direct relationship → 2 variables increase or decrease together

slope of line is positive

90
New cards

negative correlation- ex) more physical activity, lower blood pressure

inverse relationship- one increases, other decreases

91
New cards

correlational coefficient

statistical measure of relationship, revealing how closely 2 things vary together/how one predicts the other

between -1 and 1

closer to -1 or 1 → stronger, closer to 0 → weaker

measures strength and direction (+ or -)of relationship

92
New cards

why is correlation not causation?

no variable manipulated, don’t know which variable causes other (bidirectional ambiguity), 3rd variable (confounding) problem, illusory correlations

93
New cards

illusory correlations- ex) lucky pencil

perceive there to be relationship but there is not

94
New cards

central tendency

mode, mean, median

identifying estimated “center” of distribution of data

95
New cards

mean

average of data set

96
New cards

median

exact middle of data set

97
New cards

mode

most occurring value in data set

98
New cards

variation

range and sd

allows understanding of variation between data points

99
New cards

range

difference between highest value and lowest

100
New cards

standard deviation

indicates avg. distance from mean for set of scores, tells where each value point is in terms of the mean

higher → less similar score, father from mean

lower—> more similar, closer to mean