Psychology's History and Approaches and Research Methods
psychology
scientific study of behaviors and mental processes of humans and animals
critical thinking
examines assumptions and the source, discerns hidden biases, evaluates evidence, assesses conclusions
two early themes of prescientific psychology
mind-body existence debate and nature vs nurture
what did socrates and plato believe?
mind separate from body (continues after death), knowledge is innate → nature
What did Aristotle believe?
knowledge isn’t preexisting, it grows with experience → nurture
empiricism
knowledge comes from experience; observation, and experimentation enable scientific knowledge
observation and experimentation are essential for gaining scientific knowledge through direct experience
Rene Descartes
nature AND nurture, mind/body exist separately but communicate thru “nerves”, combines philosophy and psychology (dissected animals)
Francis Bacon
importance= common sense and experimenting → using experiments to challenge superstitions
John Locke
everyone born “blank slate”, nurture argument → we are who we are through experiences
phrenology
late 1800s, read personality based on head bumps, early precursor to neuroscience, Franz Joseph Gall
Father of Psychology
Wilhelm Wundt
What did Wilhelm Wundt do
1st psychological lab in germany, 1st psychological experiment (measuring perception of sound), beginning of 1st field structuralism through introspection
4 “old schools”
structuralism
functionalism
gestalt
psychoanalytic
who founded structuralism
Wilhelm Wundt
structuralism
breaking consciousness into parts and naming them *introspection
problem: relies on smart, verbal ppl to say feelings
introspection
process of looking inward to observe one’s own psychological processes
who founded functionalism?
William James
functionalism
consciousness is always changing so hard to break into parts, should look functions of our consciousness
gestalt
whole is different than sum of parts, look at whole and organizational processes of brain
who founded psychoanalytic perspective?
sigmund freud
psychoanalysis
emotional problems and abnormal behavior is a result of unconscious conflicts, emphasis on childhood, unconscious thoughts, defense mechanism, talk therapy, dream analysis
Mary whiton calkins
student of William James, took classes at harvard but couldn’t get degree, American Psychological Associations 1st female president
Margaret Floy Washburn
1st woman to earn PhD in Psych
Psychodynamic perspective
The theory that one’s past traumas and conflicts or past experiences influence their behavior/mental processes
psychodynamic people-thumb
Carl Jung, Alfred Alder, Erik Erikson
behaviorist perspective- middle
the idea that people accumulate experiences and behaviors through learning and through associations or rewards/punishments.
humanistic perspective- ring
The idea that all people are good and unique individuals who strive to be the best version of themselves
cognitive perspective- pointer
The idea that someone’s mental processes and internal feelings affect the way they think, communicate, and behave
biological perspective
The theory that some of one’s behavioral characteristics/mental processes are in their DNA and have been passed down through the genepool
evolutionary perspective- extra
The theory that someone’s behaviors/mental processes were once beneficial to survival and are still present in their genes today because they helped their ancestors survive
socio-cultural perspective- palm
The theory that one’s environment and culture around them heavily influences one’s behavior/mental processes.
basic research vs applied research
basic: increase scientific knowledge (7 perspectives)
applied: solve practical problems + assist people (subfields)
industrial organization subfield
improve life in workplace
human factors subfield
improve life in general
counseling- think mr kittridge
help clients address emotional, social, and physical stressors
clinical psychology
therapist, study of mental disorders
psychiatry
med school, can prescribe meds
confirmation bias- think hair brands
we look for info that supports our beliefs and ignore info that refutes it
anecdotal evidence
Evidence based on personal experiences or observations, lacking scientific testing
empirical evidence
Evidence obtained through direct observation, measurement, or experimentation. based on data not opinions
hindsight bias (I-knew-it-all-along phenomenon)
tendency to believe one would have foreseen it after learning an outcome
overconfidence
tendency to think we know more than we do
perceiving order in random events- think coin toss
tendency to think order isn’t random in events even though it is
inductive reasoning
start w/ observing/research, then come up with theory
deductive reasoning
start w/ theory, then do research
theory
explanation using evidence and principles that organize observations
hypothesis
testable prediction that uses operational definitions of each variable so that you can test the theory
operational definition- think examples in class
(distinguishes hypothesis from theory) → statement of exact procedures in research→ makes it testable and shows what they’re measuring
case study
descriptive technique in which one individual/group is studied in depth in the hope of revealing universal principles *atypical individual cases→misleading
naturalistic observation
descriptive technique of observing + recording behavior in naturally occurring situations without trying to manipulate/control the situation
studying ppl in natural environments
doesn’t explain behavior, describes it
survey
obtaining self-reported attitudes/nehaviors of particular group, usually by questioning or random sample of group
wording effect
changes of wording of questions → major effects
sampling bias
flawed sampling process that produces unrepresentative sample
population
all in group being studied from which samples may be drawn
random sample
sample fairly represents a population bc each member has equal chance of inclusion
*reduces chance of bias or confounding
validity
credibility
things needed in order to not have interferences with experiment
standardization- everyone has same experience, random assignment, control of researcher bias, demand characteristics/participant bias, and confounding variables
researcher bias
tendency for researchers to unknowingly influence results of experiment
Participant bias (demand characteristics)
subjects know they are being watched or recognize what experimenter is investigating
target population
who you want to study
self selected sampling
(volunteer)- can be biased because types of people not representative of everyone
opportunity sampling
convenience- can have underlying bias bc of location and people there
purposive
want specific group you can’t get with random
biased because not entirely representative of population bc not random
stratified
Radom samples of multiple groups
snowball
one person recruits ppl, they recruit others
biased bc not much variation
sampling
when researchers select a group to study
assignment
researchers decide which of their participants will be in each condition
descriptive research methods purpose
observe and record behavior
types of descriptive research methods
Observations, Interviews, Survey, Case Studies
how are descriptive research methods conducted?
case studies, naturalistic observations, surveys (nothing is manipulated)
naturalistic observations
observing ppl in natural only
laboratory observations- think chimps/kids
observations in highly controlled environments, each participant has highly similar experience (downside- not like real life)
reactivity
people know they’re in study so change behavior
covert observations- think “co-cover”
hidden/secret, ppl don’t know they’re being observed (benefit- no reactivity)
overt observations- think “o-open”
ppl know they’re being observed
participant observations- think mr Clarke
affects research could get more info
nonparticipant observations- think mr Woodward
doesn’t affect research, might not get as much info
unstructured interviews
no script, each is different
structured interviews
don’t deviate from script
semi-structured interviews- think dress up
w/ script but ask follow up ?s
focus groups
sparks ideas, efficient’ biased, can change answer to fit group
problems with interviews
reactivity, measuring self reports info, not behavior
longitudinal research
follow same group over time
cross-sectional research
comparisons @ single point in time- not same participants but more efficient
how can you do cause→effect
manipulate IV and have random assignment
field experiment
research method that uses some controlled elements of traditional lab experiments, but takes place in natural, real-world settings
quasi experiment
manipulate IV, NO random assignment
correlational studies- ex) video games/aggressive thinking
measuring relationship between 2 variables
no manipulated variable, no cause/effect, no random assignment
data comes from surveys, psychological tests, archival records, quasi experiments
positive correlation- ex) # of years in school/income
direct relationship → 2 variables increase or decrease together
slope of line is positive
negative correlation- ex) more physical activity, lower blood pressure
inverse relationship- one increases, other decreases
correlational coefficient
statistical measure of relationship, revealing how closely 2 things vary together/how one predicts the other
between -1 and 1
closer to -1 or 1 → stronger, closer to 0 → weaker
measures strength and direction (+ or -)of relationship
why is correlation not causation?
no variable manipulated, don’t know which variable causes other (bidirectional ambiguity), 3rd variable (confounding) problem, illusory correlations
illusory correlations- ex) lucky pencil
perceive there to be relationship but there is not
central tendency
mode, mean, median
identifying estimated “center” of distribution of data
mean
average of data set
median
exact middle of data set
mode
most occurring value in data set
variation
range and sd
allows understanding of variation between data points
range
difference between highest value and lowest
standard deviation
indicates avg. distance from mean for set of scores, tells where each value point is in terms of the mean
higher → less similar score, father from mean
lower—> more similar, closer to mean