1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
federalism
a system with multiple levels of constitutional authority and a division of powers between them, such that neither is subordinate to the other
why federalism?
practical → size + diversity of recognition of subnational identities
normative → benefits of larger union (ie. security), local rule (multiple social identities), and check against gov power
reasons for canada’s union in 1867
economic interests and territorial expansion (particularly in trade)
threat from the US
in order to have resources, manpower + political power, solid gov was needed
Quebec + maritimes sought local control and would not have agreed unless it was a federalist structure
how constitutional federal division favour national (federal) government
nation-building powers: “great subjects of legislation”
superior revenue sources
powers of reservation + disallowance
power of reservation
reservation (federal government could refuse to give royal assent (ask crown to wait) to provincial legislation’s request and "reserve" it for further consideration) (not used since 1961)
power of disallowance
disallowance (the federal government could disallow provincial legislation (tell crown no thanks) within one year of its passage) (not used since 1943)
high decentralisation
a system where power and authority are distributed among various levels of government, provinces in canada are typically more powerful than american states (pushed by quebec)
ie. giving more taxing powers to provincial governments
fiscal federalism
financial arrangements between the federal and provincial levels of government, primarily through transfers from the federal government to provinces
vertical fiscal imbalance
gap between federal resources and spending demands and provincial and spending demands (federal vs provinces)
horizontal fiscal imbalance
differences among provinces in resources (province vs province)
federal spending power
allows the federal government to spend money in areas of provincial jurisdiction by transferring funds to provinces, sometimes with conditions attached.
addressing vertical fiscal imbalance
CHT AND CST treat al provinces equally → maintains inequality among provinces (no equity)
instead, equalise by transfer to some provinces whose fiscal capacity is below the national average to ensure reasonably comparable level of public services at reasonable levels of taxation
addressing horizontal fiscal imbalance
treats provinces unequally to achieve equitable outcomes ‘have’ and ‘have-not’ provinces by redistributing resources to ensure that all provinces can provide similar levels of public services despite differences in their fiscal capacities.
→ prince edward island has received the most funding in equalisation payments per capita, ontario the least
canada health transfer
largest program of transfers from federal to provinces
funding for health care service provision
2025-26: 54.7 billion
canada social transfer
second largest program of transfers from the federal government to provinces
funding for social services and education
2025-26: 17.4 billion
federal spending power
ability of the federal government to send its own money in areas of provincial responsibility
quasi-federalism
a system of governance where powers are divided between national and subnational governments, often with regional autonomy.
conditional vs unconditional grants
Conditional grants are funds provided to provinces that must be used for specific purposes, while unconditional grants are given without limitations on how the money is spent.
bicameralism
the practice of having two legislative or parliamentary chambers. (like Canada)