The Federal Judiciary

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/28

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

29 Terms

1
New cards

Federal Judiciary

The branch of the federal government that interprets the laws of the nation.

2
New cards

Supreme Court

The highest level of the federal judiciary, which was established in Article III of the Constitution and serves as the highest court in the nation.

3
New cards

Original Jurisdiction

The authority of a court to act as the first court to hear a case, which includes the finding of facts in the case.

4
New cards

Appellate Jurisdiction

The authority of a court to hear and review decisions made by lower courts in that system.

5
New cards

Federalist No. 78

Argument by Alexander Hamilton that the federal judiciary would be unlikely to infringe upon rights and liberties but would serve as a check on the other two branches  

6
New cards

Marbury vs. Madison (1803)

A Supreme Court decision that established judicial review over federal laws.

7
New cards

Judicial Review 

The authority of the Supreme Court to strike down a law or executive action if it conflicts with the Constitution.

8
New cards

Criminal Law

A category of law covering actions determined to harm the community.

9
New cards

Civil Law

A category of law covering cases involving private rights and relationships between individuals and groups.

10
New cards

Federal District Courts

The lowest level of the federal judiciary; these courts usually have original jurisdiction in cases that start at the federal level. 

11
New cards

Federal Courts of Appeals

The middle level of the federal judiciary; these courts review and hear appeals from the federal district courts.

12
New cards

Precedent

A judicial decision that guides future courts in handling similar cases. 

13
New cards

Stare Decisis

The practice of letting a previous legal decision stand. 

14
New cards

Majority Opinion 

Binding Supreme Court opinions, which serve as precedent for future cases.

15
New cards

Concurring Opinion

An opinion that agrees with the majority decision, offering different or additional reasoning, that does not serve as precedent.

16
New cards

Dissenting Opinion

An opinion that disagrees with the majority opinion and does not serve as precedent.

17
New cards

Judicial Restraint

A philosophy of constitutional interpretation that justices should be cautious in overturning laws.  

18
New cards

Judicial Activism

A philosophy of constitutional interpretation that justices should wield the power of judicial review, sometimes creating bold new policies 

19
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

20
New cards

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

It is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public schools, due to violation of the First Amendment

21
New cards

Wisconsin v. Jonas Yoder (1972)

Amish parents' fundamental right to free exercise of religion outweighed the state's interest in educating their children

22
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)

Recognized the First Amendment rights of students in U.S. public schools

23
New cards

Texas v. Johnson (1989)

Burning the flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

24
New cards

Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)

The fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution

25
New cards

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

The exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government

26
New cards

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality

27
New cards

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

Law enforcement in the United States must warn a person of their constitutional rights before interrogating them

28
New cards

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022)

The United States Constitution does not confer a right to abortion

29
New cards

Gitlow v. New York (1925)

Extended the First Amendment's provisions protecting freedom of speech and freedom of the press to apply to the governments of U.S. states