1/339
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
describe the nature side of the nature-nurture debate.
rooted in nativist theory (knowledge and abilities are innate or preprogrammed)
philosophers such as Descartes agreed with this side
genetics are the primary cause of behaviour
explain the nurture side of the nature-nurture debate.
rooted in empiricist theory - behaviour is a result of our experiences and learning
Philosopher John Locke argued that the mind was ‘tabula rasa’ or blank slate on which experiences are written on
person’s environment is the primary cause of behaviour
what are the 3 levels of the environment in relation to ‘nurture’.
pre-natal
post-natal experiences (conditions grown up in)
wider culture/historical context
what is the nature-nurture debate about?
the relative importance of heredity and environment in determining behaviour
behaviour is often a result of both nature and nurture
what 3 conclusions can be drawn from twin studies in relation to the nature-nurture debate?
eg. Gottesman SZ
higher concordance rates in MZ than DZ - the role of genetics
BUT concordance rates are not 100% so must be environmental factors involved
twins come from similar environments so concordance rates may not be the result of genetics
What are the issues with twin studies in supporting nature vs nurture?
What are the possible alternatives?
it cannot be concluded that high concordance rates are due to genetics as they may be caused by shared environment/upbringing. means it is hard to prove the relative importance of the sides of the debate
alternatively, adoption studies can be used as they remove the similar environment to determine the relative importance of nature separately. (however this can cause ethical issues, eg 3 identical strangers)
what are some topics that support the nature side of the debate?
concordance rates
MAOA gene
XY XX
DRD3 PCM1
Bowlby’s monotropic theory (I&I)
Margaret mead
Bandura (males are more aggressive)
what are some topics that support the nurture side of the debate?
concordance rates never being 100%
SLT and aggression/gender
family dysfunction - SZ
behaviourism and phobias (two process model), learning theory of attachment
what are the other explanations for the nature-nurture debate?
interactionist approach SZ
argues that genetics predispose individuals, however, predispositions are moderated by the environment.
therefore a person’s phenotype is a product of the interaction between nature and nurture (eg diathesis-stress model
biosocial approach to gender
shows that the debate may be outdated as scientific knowledge progresses
what are examples of disorders that are more common in one gender?
males
dyslexia
PTSD
ADHD
autism
alcohol use dissorder
females
EDs
anxiety dissorders
OCD
depression
what 3 researchers investigated gender bias?
baron-cohen 2002
Bremsel and Gallup 2012
Maccoby and Jacklin 1974
what was Baron-Cohen’s research into gender bias?
argued that high prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in males is a result of an ‘extreme male brain’
What was Bremsel and Gallup's research into gender bias?
propose having an ‘extreme female brain’ can explain differences in the prevalence of EDs between males and females
male brain = high systemising skills, low empathising skills
female brain = high empathising, low systemising
what was Maccoby and Jacklin’s research into gender bias?
concluded there was only consistent evidence for 4 differences that exist between males and females
girls have greater verbal ability
girls are less aggressive
boys have greater visual and spatial abilities
boys have greater arithmetical abilities
what is gender bias?
when psychological research offers a view that does not justifiably represent the experience of both men and women
threatens universality of reasearch which aims to develop theories that apply to everyone
what are the two types of gender bias?
alpha bias
behaviour is misinterpreted because psychological research exaggerates/overestimates the differences between males and females
consequence is that one gender is devalued in comparison to another
beta bias
behaviour is misinterpreted because psychological research minimises/underestimates the differences between the sexes
eg. research by Asch and Milgram only used male ppts - response given was assumed applicable to both sexes
What is androcentrism?
possible consequence of gender bias in research
known as male bias
when the behaviour of men is accepted as the norm and that the behaviour of women is different is therefore atypical
gynocentrism = dominant focus on women in research/theory
What is bowlby’s supporting evidence for alpha bias?
Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation
suggested that removing a young child from their mother would cause emotional problems later in life
overestimated the importance of the maternal bond, downplaying the role of the father
How can Freud’s theories support androcentrism and alpha bias?
alpha bias
exaggerates the differences between sexes in his theories of gender development,
especially where he sees femininity as an expression of failed masculinity.
androcentrism
androcentric as Freud took male behaviour as the standard for all human behaviour.
both
concept of penis envy means that women are defined by what they lack
How can schizophrenia be used to support alpha bias?
gender bias in the diagnosis of SZ
eg of alpha bias as it overestimates the difference in the prevalence of SZ - diagnosis may be missed in female patients
what are the supporting evidences for alpha and beta bias?
alpha
Bowlby’s maternal deprivation
Freud’s gender development
Gender bias in SZ diagnosis
beta
biopsychology
aggression MAOA gene
How can biopsychology provide supporting evidence for beta bias?
fight or flight response seen as universal in a threatening situation
however new evidence shows that females biology tends to focus on defending offspring/forming defensive networks with other females
‘Tend and befriend’ response
How can aggression provide supporting evidence for beta bias?
The MAOA gene has been reported in males to cause aggression and is assumed to do the same in females
however more recent rewhat asearch suggests that it is linked to happiness in females.
what are the implications of alpha and beta bias?
alpha
creates misleading assumptions about male/female behaviour
can lead to damaging social stereotypes and scientific ‘justification’ for denying people opportunities for a diagnosis
means there are consequences of research that overestimates differences
beta
encourages men and women to be seen as equal leading to equal opportunities however, it may lead to misinterpretation of experience.
explain how there is also sexism within the research process…
male researchers and studies which find a gender difference are more likely to be published
means that psychology may be guilty of supporting a type of institutionalised sexism creating gender bias in theories and research
what is the context of the culture bias debate?
critics have argued that mainstream psychology has ignored the influence of culture of behaviour
mostly has had a universal approach which is flawed
cultures vary - different norms and values influence the way people think and behave
What is cultural bias?
when psychological research put forward a view that is not representative of all cultures
differences have been ignored and findings have been interpreted through the ‘lens’ of a persons culture
what are the risks of cultural bias?
threatens the validity and universality of research which aims to develop theories which apply to everyone
what is ethnocentrism?
a type of cultural bias
belief that ones own culture is superior to others
making a judgement of a culture cased on a persons own cultural norms and values
in extreme cases may lead to prejudice and discrimination
what is cultural relativism?
appreciating variations of behaviour across cultures
it is essential that research considers cultural context when examining behaviours in one certain culture.
What are the 5 sources of supporting evidence for cultural bias?
Ainsworth’s strange situation
definitions of abnormality
aggression
gender
schizophrenia
how can Ainsworth’s strange situation be used as support for cultural bias?
devised in the US - secure attachment is the ideal
van Ijzendoorn and kroonberg showed variations of attachment types across cultures using the method
The high % of insecure-avoidant in western Germany led to the misconception that german mothers were cold and rejecting.
How can definitions of abnormality be used as support for cultural bias?
deviation from ideal mental health, deviation from social norms, failure to function adequately
personal autonomy is seen as an ideal - but this is a Western view that values independence
social norms differ across culture
adequately functioning is culturally relative
how can Aggression be used as support for cultural bias?
evolutionary explanations assume that aggression is innate therefore universal across all humans. analysis of different cultures has shown that there is a difference.
how can gender (M.Mead) be used as support for cultural bias?
studying gender in 3 different social groups in Papua new guinea. findings were interpreted using Western views of masculinity/femininity
How can schizophrenia be used as support for cultural bias?
validity of diagnosis
cultural bias in diagnosis as shown by Keith et al - showed that 2.1% of African Americans were diagnosed compared to 1% of the white population.
‘Symptoms’ (characteristics from other cultures) can often be misinterpreted as SZ
what are the conflicting arguments of the cultural bias debate?
not all human behviour is culturally realtive
eg stages of kohlbergs cognitive thery of gender development have been demostrated across a wide rage of cultures
means that full understanding of behaviour would require universal and cross culttural reasearch
issues may be outdated
takano & osaka 1999: showed no traditional differences between USA ans japan still eist
may be outdated due to increased global communications/media
means cultural bias is less of an issue than it once was
What are the main points that conclude the cultural bias debate?
cultural bias has clearly been an issue within psychological reasearch/theories meaning caustion should be taken when making generalisations.
however reasearchers are now more aware of the importace of cultural relativism
certain strategies such as including a member of the local population in the reasearch team enable cross-cultural reasearch that challeneges typical western views of behvaiour
what do ethics committees do?
weighing up the costs and benifits
wider implications of reasearch - thinking of the potential costs of the reasearch
whethere the reasearch that may influence vulnerable groups is worthwhile - benefits
What are ethical implications?
refers to the impact the reasearch may hace on the rights of other people when it is conducted
can be difficult or impossible to control/predict
Who is a stakeholder?
a person who is interested or effected by the findings of the research eg. : ppts, general public, groups that are represented by the participants
Who investigated socially sensitive reasearch?
seiber & stanley 1988
proposed that reasearch in which there are potential consequesces for any of the stakeholders should be considered socially sensitive.
explain Cyril Burt’s research in relation to socially sensitive research.
used identical twins to support the view that negligence is largely genetic, this impacts
ppts = potential discrimination or prejudice
media = may exaggerate or perpetuate beliefs
laws+policies = educational policies
his views greatly influences the hadow report 1926 leading to the creation of the 11+ used 1944-1976 to determine the type of school that a child would attend
had an impact on their later life chances
data later revealed to be made up - he invested 2 research assistants
he was publicly discredited but the 11+ still remained for years and still lingers
consideration of wider implications of research is essential as well as how to deal with these issues when they arise.
What are the 4 ways to deal with socially sensitive reasearch?
Reasearch question = considered carefully
Medthodology used = consider the treatment of the ppts and their rights (confidentiality, anonymity etc.)
Institutional context = mindful of how data is going to be used and consider who is funding reasearch
Interpretation/Application of findings = how the findings are interpreted/applied to the real world
What are the strengths of the ethical implications debate?
code of ethics is goverened by the BPS
ethics boards at universities consult the code of ethics and discuss implications fo reasearch before it is given approval to be conducted
guidlines have been altered over time to reduce problems of socially sensitive reasearch
benifits of socially sensitive research
studies of unrepresented groups and issues may promote greater sensitivisty and understanding within society
suggests socially sensitive reasearch may play a important role in society
what are the weaknesses of the ethical implications debate?
some beleive ethical guidelines are now too strict
areas of reasearch which may help individuals, however it cannot be conducted due to social sensitivity restrictions EG intitutionalisation/adoption
shows reaching a balance between ethics and reasearch is problematic in areas
implications of reasearch are hard to predict
it is not always posible to identify implications for stakeholders. eg subliminal message
makes ethical approval a hard judgment to make and means that socially sensitive reasearch may still occur
Define subliminal messaging…
method used to influence people without them being aware of what the message is doing
Give an example that shows the issues with subliminal messaging…
in 1950s there was lots of reasearch into the method
1957 a maret researcher carried out experiment to a cinema audience
bombarded with subliminal messgaes eg ‘eat popcorn’ or ‘dribk coca cola’ appearing on the screen for 3 milliseconds
resulted in sales increasing in both popcorn and coca cola
the findings could not be replicated by anyone including law enforcement, reasearchers and advertisers
reasearcher cofessed it was a ‘gimmik’
but by that point the idea that you can manipulate peoples desired wuth unconscious messages was part of collective culture
shows how there is an issue of loosing control of what may happen when reasearch enters the public domain
Explain the case of Brian Dugan in relation to the free will and determinism debate.
american rapist and serial killer
2009 FMRI scans was used for the first time in the sentencing phase of his murder trial
para-limbic system was considerable less dense in dugan than other test subjects
What is free will?
notion that all humans can make conscious choices and are not determined by biologiaccl or external factors (agrees with cognitive and humanistic approached)
What is determinism?
notion that all an individuals traits and bhaviour are outside of conscious control and are due to internal and external factors.
there are 5 sub-types
What are the 5 types of determinism?
hard determinism
soft determinism
biological determinism (type of hard Determinism)
environmental detrminism (type of hard Determinism)
psychic determinism (type of hard Determinism)
What is hard determinism?
all huamn behaviour has an identifiable cause
everything a persons dies/thinks is determines by internal or external factors that they cannot control
all behaviour is entirely out of individuals control
What is soft determinism?
William James (1890s philosopher)
all human behaviour has a cause, but an individual does have some conscious control over the way that they behave
eg cognitive approach ( thoughts can lead to behaviour but the thoughts can be changed)
can be seen as a compromise between FW and D
What are the three types of hard determinism?
biological
beleif that behaviour is caused by internal biological factors ( eg genes, hormiones, neurochemicals, brain struct)
things the we cannot control
eg bio approach
environmental
beleif that behaviour is caused by external factors such as experiences, upbringing, learning, parents, peers that we cannot control
eg learning approaches (SLT and behaviourism)
psychic
beleif that behaviour is caused by unconscious instincts and drives
and that the cause of behaviour is rooted in childhood experiences
eg psychodynamic approach
explain how determinism fits with science?
hard determinism fits the aims of science - ie, enphasis on the idea that everything in the universe has a cause
allows scientists to predict and control certain events
lab experiments enable reasearchers to investigate cause and effect while controlling and minimising extraneous variables
What are the supporting evidences for the different deterministic views?
biological
concordance rates
basal ganglia/serotonin OCD
MAOA gene
testosterone
XY/XX
dopamine hypothesis
Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment
environmental
the learning theories
little albert
situational variables in obedience
learning theory of attachment
family dynfunction
psychic
family dysfunction
frustration aggression hypothesis
psychodynamic approach to gender development
psychodynamic approach
soft
mediational processes in SLT
cognitive approach to explaining and trating aggression
what are the two main advantages of holding a deterministic view?
psychology as a science
science is focussed on causes and making predictions, which alighns with deterministic views.
helps put psychology on equal footing to other sciences
implications for reasearch
reasearch into therapies and treatments can be conducted if behaviour can be predicted and controlled
eg antipsychotics in the treatment of SZ
means thisview can lead to positive impacts on patients lives/have real world applications taking aview
What is the main issue of a deterministic view?
implications for society
taking a view like this can be socially sensitive. eg the MAOA gene. if certain genetics predispose people to crime it is hard to hold them responsible. therefor is a problem for the justice system as rehabilitation may be impossible and managment of criminals is hard
what is the mian advantage of a free will view?
implications for treatment
approach suggests that people have conscious control over their actions. this is important in treatment as gives the individual a level of control and responsibility in their recovery
what are the two main dissadvantages of the free will view?
implications for psychology as a science
could be argued that we cannot predict behaviour or find the causes of it, limiting psychology as a science.
implications for treatment
reasearch into therapies/treatment cant be conducted if behaviour is uncontrollable or unpredictable
limits what psychologists can do to help people.
What is the basis of the holism and reductionsim debate?
concerned with the level at which it is appropriate to explain behaviour.
explanations in psych vary from lower reductionist levels which focus on basic components, to those at a higher, more holistic level.
What is reductionism?
explaining things in terms of their basic parts and underlying elements
there are 3 types of reductionism
biological
environmental
machine
What are the two types of reductionsim?
biological reductionism= based on the assumption that we are all biological organisms, so all behaviour can be explained at a biological level (eg. bio approach)
environmental reductionism= assumes that complex behaviour can be broken down into simple stimulus - respose links that are measurable, mental processes are ignored as they occur at a psychological level (eg learning approaches)
What is holism?
focusses on the system or person as a whole
breaking down processes or behaviour is innapropriate as they can only be understood by analysing the person/behaviour as a whole
considers all aspects of experience including social context/culture
eg diathesis stress model SZ (both environmental and biological factors)
How can schizophrenia support the reductionist approach?
in SZ evidence that differeing dopamine levels are a cause
reductionsit as it is only based on biological factors
advantage as it enables reasearchers to develope drugs to treat SZ lowering dopamine activity and reducing symptoms
what is the contradictory evidence for a reductionist approach?
focussing on a simple component means other explanations may be missed.
eg in SZ, reasearchers have identified fanily dysunction as a trigger - more holistic
how can SZ be approached in a holistic way?
more complete explanation is the interactionist approach eg diathesis stress model, which suggests there are a range of diathesis and stressors
this had lead to a holistic approach in treatemnts of SZ (drugs and therapy at same time), which has proven to be more effective that one or the other
explain psychology as a science in relation to the reductionism debate
reductionsim approach underpins the scientific method - looks for a cause, breaking down into simple components,objective - can lead to greater clarity of understanding
on the other hand, holistic explanations do not lend themselves to scientific testing
What does the nomothetic and ideographic debate argue?
whether it is more important to…
look at the individual as unique (ideographic)
look at the individual as part of a group, and try to establish similarities for the group (nomothetic)
What is the ideographic approach?
from greek term ‘idos’ (private or personal)
focusses on uniqueness of an individual case when explaining or studying behaviour
may be no attempt to compare to larger group
irrelevant to develope general laws of behaviour
qualititive methods are best suited to ideographic approaches, - interviews, case studies and observations. eg humanistic psychology which states that all individuals are unique
What is the nomothetic approach?
from greek term ‘nomos’ (laws)
states we can draw conclusions about population of people and generalise to the wider group from those that are studied in the reasearch process (the sample)
approach involves studing a sample to formulate general laws/principles of behaviour
quantitative methods are best suited to nomothetic approaches - testable hypothesis, large represebtitive samples, statistical testing. eg biological approach has used brain scans to make generalisations about behaviour
What makes the nomothetic approach more scientific?
uses objecttive + empirical methods to test hypothesis
methods are more replicable
sample sizes are larger/more representitive meaning generalisations can be made to the population
What is the supporting evidence for the nomothetic approach?
Bio treatment of SZ
nomothetic approaches had led to the development of drug therapies for SZ
cause of SZ is biological - high/low dopamine activity
same for all people with SZ
therefor, drug treatments that adress biochemical imbalance are appropriate
How can the effectiveness of SZ treatment be used to evaluate the ideoraphic and nomothetic approaches debate?
typical antipsychotic drugs that reduce dopamine activity are sucessfull for 70% of people
suggests that nomothetic approach has real world benifits
however not all people were helped meaning the approach is not complete
need inclusions of individual experinces
CBT is more ideographic as the therapist listens to the patients unique viewpoint and alone can help with symptom management
however this is not a cure so is not a comeplete explanation.
what is the conclusion of the ideographic/nomothetic debate?
both approaches are needed to understand behaviour
most sucessful treatent for SZ is a combination of both drugs and therapy
suggests both approahes are needed for the comeplete study of SZ
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the ideographic approach?
strengths
use of in depth qualitative methods gives detailed account and can be used to compliment the nomo approach to give supporting evidence for general laws
weaknesses
narrow/restricted research as it focusses on individuals - meaningful generalisations aren’t always possible
qualitative methods are more subjective (less scientific), conclusions are therefor open to researcher bias
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the nomothetic approach?
strengths
research tends to be more scientific - controlled methods with standardised procedures to predict behaviour eg IQ test. allows development of norms for ‘typical behaviour’ (average IQ = 100) and gives psych greater credability
weaknesses
too focussed on general laws eg. nomothetic approach saya there is a 1% preveence of SZ but not anything about the patients feelings
means the approach ignores individual human experience
why may the nature nurture debate be outdated?
science is not more invested in an interactionist approach that looks at the influence of both nature and nurture
means the srgument may be outdated
define epigenetics, niche picking and neuroplasticity…
epigenetics = how the expression of a certain gene (based on what we are exposed to) can alter behaviour
niche picking = people choose environments that complement their heredity (idea supported by plomin)
neuroplasticity = the ability of the brain to change structurally as a result of experience (eg taxi drivers)
define the 3 gene environment interactions described by Plomin et al 1977…
passive gene-environment interaction = parents pass on genes and provide an environment which both influence the child’s development
evocative gene-environment interaction = heritable traits (eg shyness) influence the reaction of others and this can reinforces the trait
active gene-environment interaction = child heritable traits influence his or her choice of environment (eg aggressive child may choose to what violent films and interact with other violent individuals)
what are the two diagnostic manuals for psychological dissorders?
DSM 5 = mostly in US
Diagnostic Statistical Manual edition 5
ICD 10 = European
international classification of diseases edition 10
how long to schizophrenic symptoms need to be present for a diagnosis?
1 month+ ICD
6month+ DSM
what percentage of the population have SZ?
1%
what are the exclusions in classifying SZ?
can’t be due to organic brain disease, alcohol or drug-related intoxication, or meet early depression criteria
what is an episodic illness?
periods of symptoms and period when there are less
sz = periods of psychotic disturbances with periods of normal functioning
what is the difference between positive and negative symptoms?
positive is an addition to normal behaviour
negative is the absence of normal behaviour
what are the main positive and negative symptoms of SZ?
positive
auditory and visual hallucinations
delusions or control, paranoia and false beliefs.
though insertion (thinking thought have been placed in mind)
negative
speech poverty (reduction in quality and amount of speech)
avolition (lack of interest and motivation)
loss of emotion
What are hallucinations?
unusual sensory experiences
some related to the environment, others have nothing to do with what senses are picking up from the environment (eg. hearing voices)
What are delusions?
paranoia and irrational beliefs
delusions of the body, part of them is under control
generally victims of violence and not the perpetrators
some delusions can lead to aggression
What is Avolition?
apathy, finding it difficult to begin/keep up with a goal
sharply reduced motivation for everyday activities
Anderson’s 3 signs of Avolition - poor hygiene, lack of persistence in work/education, lack of energy
What is speech poverty?
sufferers experience changes in speech pattern, ICD-10 views this as a negative symptom
the DSM places emphasis on speech disorganisation (classified as a positive symptom)
What characteristics of SZ are not needed for a diagnosis?
weight gain
suicidal thoughts
violence or agression
multiple personalities
insomnia
What are the key features of the biological approach?
genetics
biochemistry
brain structure
What % heritable is schizophrenia?
50% heritable
What is the basis of the genetic explanation of sz?
SZ is inherited through generations, by transmission of genes
inheritance patterns are complex and involve a combination if genes
100s genes involved (polygenic)
What two candidate genes are involved in schizophrenia?
PCM1 = pericentriolar material 1 (codes for protein involved in cell division
DRD3 = dopamine receptor gene
what is the main supporting evidence of the genetic explanation?
twin studies
MZ = 100% same DNA
DZ = 50% same DNA
what are concordance rates?
percentage chance that both twins will share the same trait
if bellow 100% other factors must be involved other than genetics
what were the findings of gottesman 1991?
concordance rates of SZ
MZ= 48%
DZ = 17%