1/4
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Unlawful Assault - s 42 Offences Against the Person Act 1861
An assault is committed where D intentionally or recklessly causes V to apprehend imminent unlawful personal violence.
Actus Reus
Conduct: Any conduct, including words alone
Result: V apprehends imminent unlawful personal violence
No physical contact required
Key points:
“Violence” includes any non-consensual touching, even minor
Focus is on the effect on V, not the likelihood of violence
Threats must be imminent (future threats alone are insufficient)
Imminence is assessed using a subjective/objective approach
Assault may be committed:
By words alone
Indirectly (e.g. threat via another person or animal)
By omission, where D is under a duty to act
Mens Rea
Intention or recklessness as to causing V to apprehend imminent unlawful violence
D must foresee the possibility of that apprehension
Key Case Facts
Constanza: Repeated threatening letters caused V to apprehend violence “at some point not excluding the immediate future” → assault established
Venna: Confirms intention or recklessness is sufficient mens rea
Distinguishing Features
No touching
Concerned with anticipation, not injury
Lowest rung on the non-fatal offences ladder
Unlawful Battery - Statutory Provision: s 42 Offences Against the Person Act 1861
A battery is committed where D intentionally or recklessly applies unlawful personal violence to V.
Actus Reus
Physical contact is required
Contact can be very slight
Includes touching clothing worn by V
V need not be aware of the contact at the time
Battery can be committed:
Directly (hitting, pushing)
Indirectly (throwing objects, spitting, causing a third party to impact V)
By omission, where D is under a duty to act
Mens Rea
Intention or recklessness as to applying unlawful force
Key Case Facts
Thomas: Touching clothing worn by V constitutes touching the person
DPP v K: Acid placed in hand dryer → indirect battery
Santana-Bermudez: Failure to warn police officer about needles → battery by omission
Distinguishing Features
Requires physical contact
Assault = apprehension only
Battery = application of force
Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm (ABH) - s 47 Offences Against the Person Act 1861
An assault or battery which occasioned actual bodily harm.
Actus Reus
A base offence of assault or battery
Harm amounting to actual bodily harm
A causal link between the assault/battery and the harm
Actual Bodily Harm:
Any injury that is more than transient or trifling
Can include psychiatric injury, but not mere emotions
Mens Rea
Mens rea for the assault or battery only
No requirement that D intended or foresaw ABH
Key Case Facts
Constanza: Assault + psychiatric injury → ABH
Confirms that harm need not be physical
Distinguishing Features
First offence requiring actual injury
Constructive liability: harm need not be foreseen
More serious than battery; less serious than s 20
Malicious Wounding or Inflicting Grievous Bodily Harm - s 20 Offences Against the Person Act 1861
D unlawfully and maliciously wounds or inflicts grievous bodily harm on another.
Actus Reus
Wound: Break in the continuity of the skin (inner and outer layers)
OR
Infliction of GBH: Really serious bodily harm
GBH can include:
Serious physical injury
Serious psychiatric injury
Mens Rea
Maliciously = intention or recklessness as to some harm
D need not intend or foresee serious harm
Key Case Principles (from chapter)
Mens rea is lower than s 18
Recklessness suffices
Distinguishing Features
Injury must be really serious
No intent to cause GBH required
More serious than s 47; less serious than s 18
Wounding or Causing Grievous Bodily Harm with Intent - s 18 Offences Against the Person Act 1861
D unlawfully and maliciously wounds or causes grievous bodily harm, with intent to:
Cause grievous bodily harm, or
Resist or prevent lawful arrest
Actus Reus
Wounding OR
Causing GBH
“Causing” is broader than “inflicting” and includes indirect causation.
Mens Rea
Specific intent to cause grievous bodily harm
OR
Intent to resist or prevent lawful apprehension
Recklessness is not sufficient.
Distinguishing Features
Highest non-fatal offence
Requires specific intent
Maximum sentence: life imprisonment