Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
AG v Doughty
You cannot sue over a thing of delight
Halsey v Esso Petroleum
duration/time of nuisance
Sturges v Bridgman
prescription
Christie v Davey
Malicious motive made D's conduct unreasonable.
Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks
Duration of interference even temporary can be unlawful
Sturges v Bridgman
locality
Leaky v National Trust
D can also be liable for nuisance as a result of natural causes if they refuse to take precautions
Christie v Davey (non physical)
Non-Physical discomfort can be indirect interference
Network Rail Infrastructure v Morris
It must affect the common and ordinary use of the land, the claimant cannot just be unusually sensitive
Wheeler v Saunders
planning permission
Wheeler v Saunders (indirect)
Smell can be indirect interference
Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather
Exceptionally dangerous items can be non natural
Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan
Interference must be indirect
Transco v Stockport
The use of the land must be out of the ordinary use considering the time and locality
Halsey v Esso Petroleum (damage)
There must be a substantial interference
Hunter v Canary Wharf (Tv)
A tv is a thing of delight
Tetley v Chitty
The person who is causing or allowing the nuisance can be sued
Fearn v Tate Gallery
Interference must be unlawful