1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
bagadikian
recent trends in media ownership and control suggest that the number of companies controlling global mass media has significantly shrunk in recent years
commercial terrestrial tv 📺
controlled by ITV
cable digital and satellite TV 📡
controlled by sky and virgin media (murdoch and branson)
curran
ownership of british media newspapers always been controlled by a few powerful yt men ‘press barons’
7 ppl now dominate the ownership of british newspapers
features of media control
vertical integration ↕
horizontal integration ↔
conglomeration and diversification
global conglomeration
synergy
technological convergence
vertical integration ↕
one company owns all stages of media product production
film studio and cinema
horizontal integration ↔
cross media ownership
1 company owns a newspaper and tv companies
conglomeration and diversification
company has a wide variety of products beside media
virgin owns trains
global conglomeration 🌍
movements of media cooperations into global marketplace
synergy
media companies produce and promote the same products in different forms
TV, DVD, music 📺 📀 🎶
technological convergence
one device being able to access various forms of media
phones 📱
marxist view 🧠🕹
miliband
owners directly control and manipulate content to spread dominant ideology
journalists run the media within boundaries to keep their jobs
curran and seaton
marxist
found evidence that media owners did interfere and manipulate content to benefit themselves
rupert mordoch
media mogul that has influenced media to support tory views
2003 all of his newspapers supported the iraq war because he did
evans
despite the independence of editors, murdoch continued to undermine them to adopt his right wing tory view
marxist view ao3
pluralists - media companies want to make profit. they do this by publishing a diverse ideology. focuses on audience, not owners
deterministic - audiences aren’t passive and gullible. ppl can reject and criticise what they see
the state regulate media ownership so not one owner or company can dominate the audience
neo marxist view 🕵♀️
although owners have power, the direct day-to-day control of media is left to managers and journalists
gramsci
neomarxist
hegemonic. ruling class views are dominant, so more widely accepted
GMG
most journalist/managers are yt and MC. share same culture and views as dominant class
sometimes go against dominant ideologies to attract audiences and make a profit
agenda setting and gatekeeping used to maintain dominant ideologies and promote it
neomarxist ao3
marxists - owners inevitably do influence workers. they have power to hire and fire
pluralists - they see the audience as passive and easily swayed, but they are actually active and critical
pluralist view 👩💻
media owned by a variety of organizations, not just small elite
pluralists on journalism
journalist have independence to shape news by following ‘news values’
pluralists on audience 🍬🍬
active audience
they can accept/reject/interpret/ignore
agendas set by audience. they can ‘pick and mix’
pluralists on owners
owners profit through high audience figures and therefore provide media according to what the audience want
pluralism ao3
owners still have the power to hire and fire journalists. they can hire high level editors that share the same views to influence media