1/77
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What is schizophrenia
Severe mental disorder where contact with reality and insight are impaired
What is classification
Organising symptoms into categories based on which symptoms cluster together in people with mental disorders
What are the two major systems for classification
ICD-10 : International Classification of Disease, 10th Edition
DSM-5 : Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th Edition
DSM Classification
Looks for one or more positive symptom
ICD classification
Looks for two or more negative symptoms
What are positive symptoms
Things that are in addition to normal experience
What are the positive symptoms of schizophrenia
Hallucinations
Delusions
Hallucinations
Unusual sensory experiences, may or may not have a relation to the environment
Can be tactile, auditory and visual
Delusions
Irrational beliefs that can take any form
Grandiose = Person believes they are famous, omnipotent, very high status
Persecution = Person believes they are being hunted, e.g. by government
What are negative symptoms
Abnormal experiences where there is a loss of normal experience
Negative symptoms of schizophrenia
Avolition
Speech poverty
Avolition
Find it difficult to begin or maintain a task
Andreason : Three identifying signs = Poor hygiene, lack of persistence of work or education, lack of energy
Speech poverty
Reduction in the amount or quality of speech
DSM 5 = Speech disorganisation
Considered a positive symptom by DSM 5
Speech is incoherent, lacks train of thought
EVAL : Reliability of classification , Cheniaux et al
2 psychiatrists diagnose 100 people using DSM and ICD, inter-rater reliability was poor
1 : DSM= 26 ICD=44
2: DSM=13 ICD=24
DSM under diagnoses and ICD over diagnoses
EVAL: Validity, including Cheniaux
Validity = extent to which we are measuring what we claim to be measuring
Criterion validity = Cheniaux highlights how DSM under-diagnoses and ICD over-diagnoses, therefore criteria vary too much to be valid
What is co-morbidity
Where / how often two conditions occur together
EVAL : Co-morbidity
Where there is high co-morbidity, it can question validity of diagnosis and the classification, as it could just be one disorder
EVAL: Co-morbidity, Buckley et al
50% of people diagnosed with SZ also have depression (50%), substance abuse (47%), PTSD (29%), OCD (23%)
Means we are bad at telling the difference between the disorders
Weakness of both diagnosis and classification
EVAL : Symptom overlap
SZ and bipolar both involve delusions and avolition
Questions both diagnosis and classification
EVAL: Gender bias
Longnecker et al : Since 80s, men have been diagnosed more often than women
Cotton et al: Women are able to mask their poor functioning better as there is expectations for role in life
EVAL: Gender bias, level of functioning
Cotton et al : Women appear to function better than men, being more able to maintain work life and good family relationships
May influence the lesser diagnosis
Brings into question the validity of diagnosis
EVAL: Cultural bias
African America or people of Afro-Caribbean origin are several times more likely to be diagnosed with SZ, without any increase in the countries themselves
Indicates a cultural bias
Symptoms may be more general acceptable due to cultural beliefs, but cultural traditions may be misconstrued by a person outside the culture
Familial genetic explanation: Gottesman
Gottesman : MZ twins = 48% chance, DZ = 17% chance, Parents = 6%
Hard to distinguish between environment and genetics
Strong relationship between degree of genetic similarity and risk of schizophrenia
Candidate genes
Schizophrenia is polygenic = requires a number of factors working in combination
Schizophrenia is aetiologically heterogenous: different combinations of factors could lead to SZ
Dopamine hypothesis
Hyperdopaminergia = higher levels of dopamine activity
Hypodopaminergia = lower levels of dopamine activity
Hyperdopaminergia in the subcortex
Higher dopamine in the central areas of the brain
Excess dopamine receptors in Broca’s area associated with speech poverty and/or auditory hallucinations
Hypodopaminergia in the cortex
Goldman Rakic et al : Low levels of dopamine in prefrontal cortex, related to negative symptoms of SZ
Prefrontal cortex used in decision making
What is a neural correlate
Structure /function of brain correlates with experience
Negative symptom neural correlates
Avolition = Lowered motivation, ventral striatum related to anticipation of reward, abnormalities may lead to avolition
Juckel et al : Decreased activity in ventral striatum in SZ ptp
Positive symptoms for neural correlates
Superior temporal gyrus and anterior cingulate gyrus
Allen et al : Scanned brain of ptp having auditory hallucinations, lower activation levels in areas of the hallucination group, more likely to mix up own and others voice
BIO EVAL : Correlation vs. causation
Is decreased activity in ventral striatum caused by SZ
Or does the SZ cause the decreased activity
BIO EVAL: Evidence for dopamine hypothesis
Tauscher et al: Antipsychotic drugs reduce dopamine activity
Lindstroem et a: Chemicals that produce dopamine are taken up faster in people with SZ, suggests they produce more dopamine
BIO EVAL: Evidence against dopamine hypothesis
Curran et al: Dopamine agonists (increase dopamine) make symptoms worse, and can induce symptoms in non-schizophrenics
Moghaddam and Javitt: Current research focussed on neurotransmitter called glutamate
BIO EVAL: Absence of family history
Brown et al: Positive correlation between paternal age and risk of schizophrenia
Increase of father age = increase risk of sperm mutation
BIO EVAL: Evidence for genetic susceptibility
Tienari et al: Adopted children with biological risk are more likely to develop SZ than those without biological component
Schizophrenogic mother
Fromm-Reichmann: Mother is cold, rejecting and controlling, family climate = tense and secretive
Distrust leads to paranoid delusions
Double Bind Theory
Emphasis on communication within family, receiving mixed messages about doing tasks and lack clarity
Getting task wrong = withdrawal of love (conditional love), left confused
Reflected in disorganised thinking and paranoid delusions
Expressed Emotion
From carer to person with schizophrenia, source of extreme stress triggers relapse
Elements: Verbal criticism, hostility toward person, emotional over-involvement with self-sacrifice
Cognitive : Dysfunctional thought processing
Metarepresentation and central control
Metarepresentation
Metarepresentation: Ability to reflect on own thoughts, gives insights into thoughts and goals
Faulty Metarepresentation = Inability to recognise actions and thoughts as own, provides explanation for delusions, think own thoughts may come from others
Central control
Suppresses automatic response and thoughts when performing deliberate actions
Disorganised speech and thought could come from inability to suppress thoughts e.g. derailment
EVAL : Support for family dysfunction
Read et al : 46 studies, 69% of woman patients had history of physical and/or sexual abuse
Berry et al : Adults with insecure attachments are more likely to have schizophrenia
EVAL : Family dysfunction, weakness
Schizophrenic patients have distorted perception of memory and family, interferes with validity
Blaming family can increase tension within the home, may make it more stressful
EVAL : Family based explanations
No evidence to support schizophrenogenic mother or double bind theory
History of parent blaming adds insult to injury and may become additional burden
EVAL : Dysfunctional information processing
Stirling et al : 30 SZ patients with 18 controls in Stroop Test, aligned with idea of central control dysfunction
SZ participants took twice as long
EVAL : Cognitive explanations and direction of causality
Links are clear but cognitive explanations do not tell us anything about origins
cannot tell which way biology and cognition influence each other
Typical antipsychotics e.g. chlorpormazine
Antagonists : reduce action of neurotransmitter, block dopamine receptors in synapses
Aim is to normalise levels of neurotransmission in key areas, reduces symptoms
Chlorpromazine : Gradual increase in dosage, sedative effect
Why were antipsychotics developed
Improve effectiveness of other drugs and decrease side effects
Atypical antipsychotic: Clozapine
Withdrawn due to agranulocytosis, blood condition
Found to be more effective then typical antipsychotics, put back on market but users need to do regular blood test
Dopamine antagonist, but also acts on serotonin and glutamate, improves mood and depression symptoms
Atypical antipsychotics : Risperidone
Developed to be just as effective as clozapine but without side effects
Binds to dopamine and serotonin, more strongly than clozapine
EVAL : Effectiveness of typical psychotics (chlorpromazine)
Thornley et al : Review of studies, comparing placebo vs chlorpromazine, 13 trials and 1121 participants
Chlorpromazine associated with better functioning, reduced symptom severity and better relapse rate
EVAL : Effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics
Meltzer : Clozapine more effective than typical antipsychotics, effective in 30-50% cases where typical antipsychotics have failed
Tests comparing types of atypical drugs are inconclusive, leading idea that it depends on person
EVAL : Side effects
Dizziness, agitation, sleepiness, weight gain, tardive dyskinesia (from dopamine super sensitivity)
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: Blocking of dopamine in hypothalamus, leads to coma and potential death
Meltzer: Atypical antipsychotics generally succeed in having less side-effects
EVAL : Understanding of dopamine hypothesis
More developed understanding of dopamine hypothesis shows some areas LACK dopamine, and dopamine antagonists wouldn’t effective
EVAL : Problems with evidence
Healy : Suggests antipsychotics are calming drug which makes it easy to highlight the positive effect they have on schizophrenic people
CBT
Identify irrational thoughts and change/ challenge them, or alter the level of threat the individual sees them to be
Allows person to make sense of how their symptoms have an effect on their thoughts and feelings, can reduce anxiety and provide understanding
Family therapy
Aims to improve communication and interaction with family, reduce stress that may contribute to a risk of relapse
Pharoah : Form alliances, reduce stress for caring relative, improve problem solving, reduce anger and guilt, balancing caring and own life
Token economies
Management for developed patterns of harmful behaviour, aim is to improve quality of life
Token given as reinforcement for desirable behaviour, rewards are primary reinforcers
EVAL: CBT effectiveness
Jauhar et al: Reviewed 34 studies on CBT, found small but significant positive impact on negative symptoms
EVAL: Family therapy effectiveness
Pharaoh et al: Moderate evidence that family therapy reduces readmissions, improves quality of life
Inconsistent and lack quality
EVAL: Evidence for token economies
McMonagle and Sultana: 3 studies with random allocation of conditions, 110 participants
1/3 studies showed improvement of symptoms, 0/3 yielded useful info about behaviour change
EVAL: Treatment not cure
Reduce stress and manages/ challenges symptoms, modifies behaviour and makes life easier to live
EVAL : Ethical issues
Token economies : Removal/ inclusion of privileges is unfair to those with more severe symptoms, manipulation for the ease of care takers
EVAL : Quality of evidence for effectiveness
Small scale studies have more positive findings but lack wider perspective/ control
Conclusions from reviews are generally more optimistic
Meehl’s Diathesis Stress
Vulnerability is entirely genetic, no amount of stress can cause SZ without gene
In carriers of genes, chronic stress and schizophrenogenic mother can aid development
Modern understanding of diathesis
Ripke et al : 108 associated genes, no one schizogene
Understanding that diathesis is not just genetic, trauma can be diathesis and further stress can cause development of SZ
Read et al: Early trauma alters brain, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system becomes over-active, makes person more vulnerable to stress in life
Modern understanding of diathesis : Trauma
Read et al : Early trauma alters brain
Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal system (feedback loop for stress) is overly sensitive so increases stress felt
Modern understanding of stress
Modern definition is anything that risks triggering SZ
More genetic vulnerability = less stress needed
Tienari et al. (Adoption study)
Children adopted from 19,000 mothers
Child rearing with high criticism and low empathy = increase risk of SZ for children with bio vulnerability
High risk children w/ adoptive families with low stress much less likely to develop SZ
Conclusion of Tiernari et al
Only those with bio vulnerability had increase chance of SZ
Combination of stress and genetic components
Modern understanding of stress : Cannabis
Increases chance by 7X
Interferes with dopamine system
Unlikely that just smoking will increase chance of SZ, needs 1 or more factor
Modern understanding of stress : Urban living
Vassos et al : Living in urban areas increase chance of SZ by 2.4X
Treatment according to interactionist model
Turkington et al : Possible to believe in bio causes and still use CBT for psychological symptoms
Not possible to just treat people with solely medicine
Interactionist treatment : Britain VS USA
Britain : Standard practice is antipsychotics and CBT
USA : Slower adoption of interactionist approach
EVAL : Original diathesis-stress model over-simple
Houston et al : Childhood sexual trauma can be vulnerability factor and cannabis use can be trigger
Older model of biological diathesis and stress as vulnerability is over simple
EVAL : Effectiveness in combo of treatment
Practical advantage as produces superior treatment outcomes
EVAL : Effective treatment, Tarrier et al
315 people with SZ randomly allocated MED + SUPPORT COUNSELLING group, MED + CBT group, MED only
People in combination groups show decrease symptoms than just MED group