1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Characteristics of Oligopoly
Most markets are imperfectly competitive
Most imperfectly competitive industries operate in an oligopoly market structure
E.g., Banks, insurance companies, department stores, supermarkets, petrol retailers, sport stores etc.
Characteristics of an oligopoly market
Characteristics of an oligopoly market
Calculation of Concentration Ratios
The most commonly used concentration ratios in the UK are the five-firm, ten-firm, and twenty-firm concentration ratios
A five-firm concentration ratio of around 60% is considered to be an oligopoly
A one-firm concentration ratio of 100% would be a pure monopoly
The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) defines a monopoly as a firm with more than 25% market share
It prevents mergers or acquisitions from taking place which would give one firm more than 25% market share
Reasons for collusive and non-collusive behaviour
Collusive behaviour in oligopolies occurs when firms cooperate to fix prices and restrict output
They cease to compete as vigorously as they can
Non collusive behaviour in oligopolies occurs when firms actively compete to maintain/increase market share
Reasons for collusion
Reasons for collusion
Types of collusion
Collusion can be overt or tacit
The net effect of collusion is that a group of firms end up acting like a monopoly in the market
Overt collusion
Overt collusion occurs when firms explicitly agree to limit competition or raise prices (price fixing)
A cartel is the most restrictive form of collusion and is illegal in most countries
The consequences of overt collusion include:
Higher prices for consumers
Less output in the market
Poor quality products and/or customer service
Less investment in innovation
How overt collusion often happens
Overt collusion often happens in the following ways
Price fixing
Setting output quotas which limit supply and naturally results in price increases
Agreements to block new firms from entering the industry
Agreements to pay suppliers the same price thereby driving down prices in the supply chain (monopsony power)
When does tacit collusion occur:
Tacit collusion occurs when firms avoid formal agreements but closely monitor each other's behaviour usually following the lead of the largest firm in the industry
The most common form of tacit collusion is price leadership or price matching
This occurs when firms monitor the price of the largest firm in the industry and then adjust their prices to match
It is difficult for regulators to prove that collusion has occurred
It provides similar benefits to firms as overt collusion, but perhaps not to the same degree
It has similar consequences for consumers as overt collusion, but perhaps not to the same degree
What is game theory
Game theory is a mathematical framework which is used by firms to ensure optimal decisions are made in a strategic setting where there is a high level of interdependence (such as in oligopoly markets)
What are the three elements of game theory
Any game has three elements
The players - (firms)
The strategies available to the players
The payoffs (outcomes) that each player receives for each combination of strategies
Game theory - It was first illustrated using a simple model called The Prisoners Dilemma
Two criminals are caught after a train robbery (Carol and Doug)
The prosecutor does not have much evidence
The criminals are guilty but have agreed with each other that they will deny all involvement
The prosector wants one (or both) to confess
The strategies and payoffs available to the prisoners are presented in a payoff matrix
Diagram analysis - game theory
If Carol and Doug stick to their plan and deny involvement, they each get 3 years jail time
If Doug confesses and indicates Carol's involvement, then Doug gets a lenient sentence of 1 year and Carol gets 10 years
If Carol confesses and indicates Doug's involvement, then Carol gets a lenient sentence of 1 year and Doug gets 10 years
There is a strong incentive to collude as it will yield the most beneficial outcome for Carol and Doug (3 years each)
Fearing the worst, both players decide to confess and receive 5 years each
This outcome is called the dominant strategy as it carries the least risk
How do firms use game theory
Firms typically use game theory in the following situations:
When making decisions to raise or lower prices
When making decisions about new advertising and branding initiatives
When making decisions about investment in product innovation
When making decisions on product bundling e.g. combined phone and broadband package
payoff matrix representing the strategic options available to Burger King and McDonald's when making advertising decisions
The £ payoffs represent the likely profits for each combination of choices selected
Diagram analysis
If Burger King and McDonald's collude and agree not to advertise (top left), they can each enjoy £3 bn. in profits
There is a strong incentive to collude
If Burger King advertises and McDonald's does not, then Burger King's profits are £5 bn. and McDonald's are £1 bn.
If McDonald's advertises and Burger King does not, then McDonald's profits are £5 bn. and Burger King's are £1 bn.
Both firms decide to advertise and receive £2 bn. of profits each
This outcome is called the dominant strategy as it carries the least risk
The risk of collusion is that one player will cheat and by doing so, get ahead
Price competition
Price wars: occur when competitors repeatedly lower prices to undercut each other in an attempt to gain or increase market share. This often occurs when there is a lower level of non-price competition and where firms find it difficult to collude (either formal or tacit)
Predatory pricing: this is the practice of lowering prices when a new competitor joins the industry in order to drive them out. Prices are often lowered to a point below the cost of production. Once they have left the market, prices are raised again. This pricing strategy is usually illegal as it is anticompetitive
Limit pricing: occurs when firms set a limit on how high the price will go in the industry. A lower price reduces profit and disincentivize other firms from joining the industry. The greater the barriers to entry the higher the limit price is likely to be as firms are already disincentivized
Types of Non-price Competition
Firms engage in a wide range of non-price competition strategies
The aim is to increase product differentiation, develop or increase brand loyalty, and to increase market share