1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Costs of poor selection
financial, cultural, personal, other
Selection system
collection of tools, processes, used by orgs to make selection decisions internally and externally (traditional interview, testing, simulations etc.)
Generalizability (validity generalization)
it's easy to assume validity that was valid in one setting will be similar to validity in another setting
Utlity
benefit of using given measure/procedure
Legality
Reliability
It is a correlation coefficient. To what extent does a measure give consistent score
.7 or higher is good
Test retest reliabilty
Same test taken different times
ex. taken ACT in Columbus, and taken it in NYC
Alternative (Equivalent) Form Reliability
the ability of two equivalent forms of an instrument to produce closely correlated results
Validity
Degree to which a test measures what it's supposed
described with correlation coefficient
Content validity
Does the test measure what it says it's measuring?
experts in the field will analyze the content to check
Face validity
I am not a math expert.. but I can look at a test and say.. ehh i guess it looks like a math test
Criterion related validity
concurrent
predictive
answers why do we care about this test.. does the result predict something?
Construct validity
uses a logical argument to see if the test measures what its supposed to be measuring by comparing a popular similar test that does meet standards
convergent validity
scores on similar tests correlate (popular version vs. my version)
discriminant validity
scores on new test vs. popular tests do not correlate
Content vs Construct Validity
content- focus internally, having experts look at the test
construct- focuses externally to see if the test is testing what it should by how it compares to popular quality tests
Predictive criterion validity
test scores collected over time for later analysis... not used for initial selection
Concurrent criterion validity
All data collected at the same time
validity coefficient
correlation
Type of selection methods
Interviews
Cognitive tests (ACT)
Personality tests (myers briggs...not recommend)
Biodata-
Physical ability to do the job (carry xxlbs)
Work samples- go ahead and try it out
Drug tests, honesty test (surveys that may have a socially desired way to answer)
What's considered an illegal interview question?
questions unrelated to the job: are you pregnant? do you have a car? Sexual preference? etc.
RJP vs. RCP
realistic job preview vs. realistic culture preview
self selection is your what?
buddy.
To help with retention.. if someone tells you this job isn't for them listen to them. don't wait until they're hired to listen to them
People don't leave organizations, they leave what?
they leave their bosses
contingency recruiters
the company gives them job specs, and they go out and try to find people to fill the job
They will then forward the resume to HR, and if the company decides to hire them.. the recruiter will get a certain percentage of commission based on the new hire's salary
Retained recruiters
establishing contract with the potential candidate... you're usually hiring for a high level position
Do interviews have high or low validity?
Low validity (0.0-0.3)
most people think they have good interview skills but they don't
Calibration meeting
managers meet to discuss candidates/employees
3 stories of an interview
and which story is the goal of candidate vs. the goal of the interviewer?
1. The story the candidate wants to tell (candidates goal)
2. The story candidate doesn't want to tell
3. The story candidate doesn't know about
interviews goal is to get to stories 2 & 3
Describe the undisciplined way to conduct an interview
Undisciplined way- 1st impressions carry the most of weight for my decision, and therefore I search for data to confirm what I already think about the person
Describe the rigorous way to conduct an interview
Rigorous is usually better.... you have first impression, and you keep searching for relevant data about the person before making your decision
Types of interviewing techniques
Competency based- questions related to competency about org/ position
Non-directive- free flowing.. "walk me through your resume"
Behavior based- "tell me about a time"... usually STAR model is good response
key experience interviewing
Future/hypothetical/situational- "what would you do if..."
BDI
Behavior description interview
"tell me about a time when"... use STAR model to answer
Examples of calibration meeting questions?
What are the strengths/weaknesses?
5 common flaws with internal interviews
1. Be aware of politics, biases
just because we think we know the person since they've been working here.. doesn't mean we base our decisions solely off of those impressions.
Be sure to conduct a rigorous interview, provide feedback to candidates
false positive and false negative
"An error in measurement where I thought the person possessed a good or bad
false negative
When a system incorrectly rejects an action instead of accepting it.