Send a link to your students to track their progress
13 Terms
1
New cards
Ethics
The philosophical study dedicated to investigating the fundamental principles and standards that guide our understanding of right and wrong behavior. It takes into account various influences such as individual values, societal expectations, cultural beliefs, and moral philosophies, aiming to create frameworks that help individuals and groups determine how to act morally in different situations.
2
New cards
Ethical Issues
Complex questions and moral dilemmas that challenge individuals and groups to evaluate and decide upon moral behavior. These issues often involve conflicting values, principles, and consequences that must be carefully assessed from multiple perspectives, making ethical decision-making a nuanced and critical process.
3
New cards
Morality
The personal beliefs and values an individual holds regarding right and wrong behavior. This set of principles is shaped by various influences, including family upbringing, cultural norms, religious teachings, and societal standards, ultimately guiding one's notions of ethical conduct.
4
New cards
Utilitarianism
An ethical framework that evaluates the morality of actions based on their outcomes, advocating for actions that maximize overall happiness and well-being for the largest number of people. It considers the aggregate consequences of actions, sometimes necessitating the sacrifice of individual rights or well-being for the greater good.
5
New cards
Strengths of Utilitarianism
This ethical approach aims to enhance general welfare by focusing on the results of actions, providing a clear and quantifiable basis for evaluating choices and policies. Its emphasis on promoting happiness for the majority is appealing for addressing societal issues and guiding public policy.
6
New cards
Weaknesses of Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism risks justifying harmful actions toward individuals or minority groups if these actions are perceived to generate greater overall benefits. This potential to overlook individual rights creates difficult moral dilemmas and can lead to significant ethical conflicts.
7
New cards
Subjectivism
An ethical perspective emphasizing the individual's beliefs and choices as the primary basis for determining morality. This approach allows different interpretations of right and wrong, challenging the existence of absolute moral standards and prioritizing personal experience over universal laws.
8
New cards
Strengths of Subjectivism
By elevating individual moral agency, subjectivism empowers people to make ethical choices based on personal beliefs and experiences. It acknowledges the legitimacy of diverse perspectives in moral discourse, enriching discussions around ethics.
9
New cards
Weaknesses of Subjectivism
This approach may lead to moral relativism, where varying individual beliefs conflict with one another, potentially eroding shared community values and ethical responsibilities. Without some form of common standard, finding consensus on ethical issues becomes increasingly challenging.
10
New cards
Situation Ethics
An ethical theory proposing that moral decisions should be derived from the context of specific situations, rather than strict adherence to predefined rules. Situation ethics emphasizes love and compassion as paramount considerations in making ethical judgments.
11
New cards
Strengths of Situation Ethics
This theory recognizes the complexity and uniqueness of moral dilemmas, promoting empathy and a human-centered approach in ethical decision-making. By focusing on love and the nuances of each situation, it encourages flexible and compassionate responses to difficult moral questions.
12
New cards
Weaknesses of Situation Ethics
The principle of love can be subjective, leading to diverse interpretations that may justify unethical behavior. This ambiguity makes it challenging to apply situation ethics consistently and may result in moral inconsistencies.
13
New cards
Relativism
The philosophical position asserting that moral judgments are inherently subjective and shaped by cultural, social, and historical contexts. It contends that there are no absolute moral truths that apply universally, suggesting that moral standards vary between different societies and individuals.