1/84
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
emotions
collections of responses to stimuli, usually responses to situations that affect well being
valence
the pleasantness of a stimulus ranging from negative to positive
arousal
the intensity of emotion, ranging from calm to excited
orgins of emotions
biological capability for emotionality
neurobiological components for emotional responses and regulation very early
functionalist approach
emotions emerge and are expressed in response to environmental demands and social interactions that the child is in and is used to communicate , regulate behaviors and social exchanges
emotional competence
the ability to express, understand and regulates emotions within the self and others
emotional development: infancy
primary emotions: present at birth
crying is primary communication tool that infants have
signal specific needs like pain, hunger and anger
emotional development: early childhood
increase their capacity to identify their emotions
learn to regulate emotions/ develop concern for others
emotional development: middle/ late childhood
increased emotional understanding + complex emotions
regulation skills improve, redirection of suppression of negative emotions
strategies to support SEL
creating a caring community
explicitly teaching children social emotional skills (emotional understanding, regulation and social engagement)
helping students set goals and learn problem solving skills
social competence
social and emotional skills that lead to positive social outcomes
theories of temperament
easy: adapts well to slight changes to circumstances or routines, positive mood most of the time
difficult: frequent crying, negative mood, slow to accept disruptions to routines
goodness of fit
refers to the match between a child’s temperament and the environmental demands the child must cope with
attachment
enduring emotional ties that unites child to caregivers
displays of attachment in early years
phase 1 - preattachment (birth - 2 months): using social signals to elicit care
phase 2 - attachment in the making (2-7months): singling out special person or people who regularly provide care
phase 3 - clear cut attachment (7-24 months): protest at seperation, seek out comfort/shows anxiety towards strangers
phase 4 - ongoing attachment (24+months): become aware of others emotional states and develop expectations of behaviors of others and themselves
strange situation behavior
freezing, dazed, signs of fear, confusion, attachment behavior directed to strangers, odd behaviors
secure attachment
confidently explore the space while mom is present, using her as a “secure base” to check in with periodically / shows distress at departure, joy at reunion
insecure - avoidant attachment
explores the room but little engagement or social referencing with mom when in the room / oblivious: may not notice departure or respond at reunion
insecure - resistant attachment
clings to mom in the room, no exploration / distressed at departure may show rejection of mom at reunion
insecure - disorganized
no coherent style of responding / extreme fearfulness in presence of caregiver
quality of care
sensitivity and high responsiveness = secure attachment
insensitivity and low responsiveness = insecure attachment
physically distant, rejecting, emotionally unavailable = avoidant
inconsistent sensitivity, low synchrony = ambivalent/ resistant
development of sense of self : infancy
rely heavily on behavioral cues about visual representation
difficultly to determine whether they simply recognize “a baby” or if they genuinely recognize themselves
infants will look for a long time at their image in a mirror by 3 months
sense of self: early childhood
descriptions of self are often physical and based on the physical comparisons to others “I’m taller than my brother” or concrete “I have a dog”
overly positive competence bias: “I’m the fastest runner in the world” - can’t engage in social comparisons of skill or tendency yet
sense of self: later childhood
by mid elementary school, self evaluations are more realistic
able to distinguish between real and ideal self
can engage in more social comparisons
more negative self evaluations
more psychological characteristics to self descriptions “kind friend” “helpful”
sense of self: adolescence
increase in self consciousness along with adolescent egocentrism
social comparisons increases
development of looking glass self - how others see you
possible selves develop - what or who a person might become
social cognition
how we understand other peoples actions and behaviors
how we relate to others
theory of mind and perspective taking
the process of considering the world through the eyes of someone else, taking on their internal mental states
how egocentrism impedes perspective taking
egocentrism is a barrier to effective to social cognition and perspective taking, as it limits the ability to understand others' viewpoints.
distinctions between self concept and self esteem and identity
self concept: the perception an individual has about him/herself
self esteem: evaluation of an individuals components of him/herself
identity: represents an integrated picture of many components of self
identity development in adolescence
exploration: experimentation, consideration of values and morals
commitment: decisions about one’s role, family obligations, religion, politics, worldviews
peer relationships, romantic partners and how these progress
eriksons psychosocial theory
development influenced by social and psychological challenges
eight developmental stages
identity statuses
identity diffusion: the status of individuals who have not yet experienced a crisis or made any commitment.
identity foreclosure: individuals who have made a commitment but not experienced a crisis (adolescents whos parents hand them commitments before a chance to explore)
identity moratorium: individuals who are in the midst of a crisis but commitments are either absent or are vaguely defined
identity achievement: individuals who have undergone a crisis and made a commitment
sex vs gender
sex: biological (chromosomes, hormones, genitals)
gender: socially defined catergories of masculine and feminine behavior and presentation
gender identity
sense of self with a presentation and adoption of membership of a particular gender
gender roles
societal expectations of presentation and performance of gender based on sex
gender typing
exhibiting behaviors that are stereotypically masculine or feminine
biological theories of gender development
estrogens: influence development of female genitals, secondary sex characteristics and reproductive organs
androgens: influence development of male genitals, secondary sex characteristics and reproductive organs
theories that suggest gender typing can be attributed to hormone levels
social cognitive theories of gender
social context provided by parents
role models in home, media and social environments
school: more role models, socialization
environmental influences
gender dynamics in families
parents express their own gender identity and typing that children carefully observe
parenting practices vary by child’s sex
early childhood, peers enforce gender expression - women are expected to follow women roles and vice versa for men
patterns of bias treatment to girls and boys in schools
cognitive theories
gender schema: strong empirical support
gender labeling: kids identify their group membership and show preferences
stability: by age 3-4 recognize that gender identity will not change overtime
constancy: identity will remain the same regardless of adherence to gender norms
gender stereotypes vs actual gender differences
gender stereotypes: ex: men are aggressive, powerful; women are nurturing and sensitive
actual gender differences: ex: men score higher on mental rotation of objects, physical aggression, motor skills
women score higher on language, reading/writing and emotional expression
dimensions of parenting styles
responsiveness: the degree of parental warmth, support and acceptance vs parental rejection and lack of affection
control: the degree of limitations, strictness and demandingness
authoritarian parenting
limits are sets and rules are enforced yet the emotional connectedness is lacking. (my way and nothing else)
authoritative parenting
limits are set and rules are enforced but parents are flexible when necessary. parents and children exhibit a high level of emotional connectedness
permissive parenting
parents either don’t set rules for behavior or don’t enforce established rules. However parents do have a close connection to their children
uninvolved parenting
parents lack both control and responsiveness. parents typically are unaware of their child’s behavior, friends, difficulties or achievements
authoratarian parent and child characteristics
parent: non responsiveness, parental power and punishments, obedience, compliance without question or explanation
child: low in social and academic competence, boys more negatively affected, unhappy and unfriendly
authoritative characteristics
parent: clear standards, allows autonomy, attentive and responsive, respect and consider child’s perspective
child: control their own behavior, high in social and academic competence, popular
permissive characteristics
parent: few limits sets, don’t require their children regulate themselves or act in appropriate or mature ways
Children: impulsive, lack of control, low school achievement, school misconduct/drug use
neglectful characteristics
parent: no limits or monitoring, not supportive and rejecting, focused on their own needs
children: attachment problems, poor peer relationships and anti social behavior, poor self regulation, low academic/social competence
examples of parenting styles
authoritarian: the von Trapp family
authoritative: the Tanner family from Full House
permissive: Regina george’s mom
neglectful: Matilda’s parents
historical & societal influences on parenting
increased public understanding of developmental psychology
free range childhood vs stranger danger, increased extracurricular scheduling, decreased autonomy
emphasis on self esteem in 1980s & 90s gave way to emphasis on self regulation in the early 2000s
children used to be “seen not heard”
effects of use of corporal punishment (physical punishment)
increased anti social behavior
increased depression, anxiety and aggressive behavior
negative relationship with parents
low self esteem
reduced cognitive function
behavioral learning theory
consequences for behaviors
bronfenbrenners ecological model of development
microsystems: immediate environment
mesosystems: links two or more microsystems
exosystems: interaction among two more environments
macrosystems: includes many of the broader cultural patterns such as beliefs, knowledge and morals
chronosystems: chronological nature of development within the individual, along with the history of the surrounding environment
positive reinforcement
adding something good (candy, new toys)
negative reinforcement
taking away something bad (no chores for the weekend)
positive punishment
adding something bad (extra chores)
negative punishment
taking away something good (no video games)
two parents, one house
tasks split by gender
provides models for adult relationships
finacial stability
fathers engage in physical playfulness; mothers engage in physical care
two same sex parents, one house
well adjusted with no differences in development compared to heterosexual coouples
no differences in sexuality
higher academic acheivement
fewer behavioral problems
benefical when happy; detrimental when conflicted
children living with single parents
income levels vary
parents busy with many responsibilities
childcare costs
more focus on childrens needs
intimacy of small family
children living with divorcing parents
children face a series of stressful events
may have more academic, behavioral and emotional problems overall
but effects are small, vast majority of kids adjust well eventually
feel the betraying of one parent
importance of peers
offer emotional support
helps practice social skills
contribute to sense of identity
help each other make sense of their lives
development of social skills: infancy
shared focus on attention, smiles, and imitation
offer toys and assist each other
seek and offer comfort, respond to others cries
time spent in childcare increase these issues
development of social skills: early childhood
play groups of 2 or 3 children
same sex groups are heavily favored after age 3
by 5 years can identify “friends” and “non friends”
development of social skills: middle childhood
reciprocity becomes more important
group activities: rule based games
eagerness to conform to social norms
managing conflicts and cooperation
groups increase in size and time spent socializing increases
development of social skills: early adolescence
mixed sex groups develop
increased reliance on peers for support and recreation
increased group divisions by race / ethnicity
development of social skills: late adolescence
greater ability to view others as individuals
fewer groups, more flexibility in selecting friends
roles of play
play is a childs work - piaget & vygostsky
play is the context in which children learn about the world develop social skills, problem solve, expend energy
rich context for developing language, communication, self regulation and social interaction skills
unoccupied (sensorimotor) play
grabbing, shaking, tossing toys
playing with or interacting with an object or their environment without an apparent goal
pretend play
using objects to pretend they are something else ( banana as a phone)
includes playing with dolls, stuffed animals as babies, friends
constructive play
building with blocks, children master “building up” and “build out” and create purposeful structure
in academics as well
social play
turn taking, interaction, conversational, physical play (sports)
games
rule based, group play
spontaneous games developed by the group or a leader
standard games introduced by an adult (board games, duck, duck, goose)
popular children
well liked by peers, tend to be kind and trustworthy (high status in peer group)
good communication skills, good leaders, confident, regulate emotions well
rejected children
identified as not liked, tend to have poor social skills
aggressive, immature, anxious, shy
more significant adjustment problems
neglected children
few intense feelings of like or dislike by peer groups
tend to be quite and keep to themselves
controversial children
well liked by some, intensely disliked by others
often aggressive in some situations and cooperative / sensitive in others
average children
liked by some, not liked by others but without intensity
generally find comfortable social niche
cognitive distortions in aggressive children
sociomoral development delay
externalizing blame
minimizing blame
hostle attribution bias
bullying
physical aggression: physical acts of bullying including, intimidation or physical harm
relational aggression: manipulating social networks to cause harm or intimidation, rumors, gossip, threats