Supremacy clause, Necessary clause, and Implied powers
3
New cards
Constitutional Text (s) and Amendments (s) in Questions
Article Section 8- Allowing congress to have power to make
4
New cards
What are the big issue(s)/Question(s) of the case
Did congress have the authority under the constitution to commission a national bank? If so, did the state of Maryland have the authority to tax a branch of the national bank operating within its borders?
5
New cards
Describe what happened to make this issue go all the way to the Supreme Court.
The supreme court said that the state could not create laws against the national government. Maryland could not tax the Bank of the United states. (Maryland taxed national bank since it was in their state)
6
New cards
Plaintiff- (1st) What issues were the plaintiff wanting to resolve?
Creating a national bank is necessary and nothing in the constitution says that Congress can't create a bank and restricting powers.
7
New cards
Defendant- (2nd) Why did the defendant not agree with the plaintiff?
Constitution never said they can establish a national bank. Powers are not delegated to the United States but reserved to the state.
8
New cards
Was it a unanimous vote?
Yes
9
New cards
Majority/Unanimous Opinion
Whether it was constitutional enough to have a national bank. The supreme reached a decision that the state could not interfere with the national bank because of the Supremacy clause.
10
New cards
Explain the Significance of the Ruling
Solidifying the power of congress when necessary or applicable. Supremacy clause states could not interfere with the national government and supreme court.