1/28
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Definition
An unlawful, indirect, unreasonable interference with a person’s use/enjoyment of their land
Claimant must have
Legal interest in the land
Case for legal interest
Hunter v Canary Wharf - confirmed family members cannot bring forward a claim
A potential defendant is an…
Occupier - including control/ownership of their land
Case for potential defendant is a occupier
Tetley
Case for used the land
Jones
Does not include landlords unless…
The authorised, caused,allowed or continued the nuisance
Case for landlords
Sedleigh- occupier were aware of pipe laid by local authorities was causing a flood but continued it = courts deemed this action as liable
Example of nuisance
Flooding
Smells
Encroachment
Noise
Balls
Brothel
Case for flooding
Sedleigh
Case for smells
Bliss v Hall
Smokes and fumes
St Helens smelting V Tipping
Case for encroachment
Lemmon
Case for noise
Kennaway
Case for vibrations
Sturgess
Case for balls
Miller
The use of land must have been
Unreasonable
Term for when the interference was clearly unlawful and unreasonable
Prima Facie Nuisance
Case for ‘unlawful interference’ means unreasonable use of land
London Borough
Case for there’s a difference between physical damage and discomfort and for physical damage, unreasonable use doesn’t matter
Halsey v Esso
When an indirectly nuisance causes physical damage this is referred to as….
Prima facie nuisance
Case for when a physical damages is caused by an indirect nuisance was foreseeable
Cambridge Water
5 factors to determine unreasonable use
The nature and character of the locality/ neighbourhood
Duration
Malice
Sensitivity
Social benefit
Cases for locality
Hirose, Sturgess
Case for if permission is granted the nature of locality may change
Coventry
Case for duration
Dr Keyser’s royal hotel
Case for malice
Hollywood silver fox farm - OC told his son to shoot near claimants property to purposely scare the animals
Case for sensitivity
Robinson - D not liable if C’s use of land is abnormally sensitive
Case for public benefit
Jackson - cricket club causing nuisance = public benefit