1/80
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Executive Function Def
Conductor for other brain regions; Supervisory, controlling, or meta cog rather than domain specific (memory, perception, lang, attention, etc)
Required for controlled v auto behav + important in multitask and switching tasks
What is Exec Funct req for?
Controlled v auto behav + multitasking/task switching
Where is executive functioning in brain?
Prefrontal Cortex
What animal has the most detailed frontal lobe?
Humans
Divisions of PFC (detailed)
VLPFC
DLPFC
Anterior PFC/Frontal Pole/Rostral PFC
Anterior Cingulate Cortex
Orbitofrontal Cortex
Ventro-lateral PFC (VLPFC) Left Hemi
Retrieval + maintained of semantic/linguistic info
Divisions of PFC (detailed)
Ventro-lateral PFC (VLPFC) Right Hemi
Retrieval + maintainace of visual/spatial info
Divisions of PFC (detailed)
Dorso-lateral PFC (DLPFC) Left Hemi
Selecting a possible range of responses + suppressing inapprop ones; Manipulating the contents of WM
Divisions of PFC (detailed)
Dorso-lateral PFC (DLPFC) Right Hemi
Monitoring + checking of info held in mind, particularly in uncertainty (info organization); Vigilance + sustained attention
Divisions of PFC (detailed)
Anterior PFC, Frontal Pole, Rostral PFC
Multitasking; Maintaining future goals while currently performing other tasks or subgoals
Divisions of PFC (detailed)
Anterior Cingulate
Monitoring in situations of response conflict + error detection; Detection of errors + response conflict (potential errors)
Activity greatest on an error trial
Divisions of PFC (detailed)
Orbio-frontal Cortex
Executive processing of emotional stim (eg. evaling risks + rewards); Behav resp mediated by the emotional component
Divisions of PFC (detailed)
Medial or Cingulate PFC
Motivation conduct
Divisions of PFC (detailed)
Petrides’ Theory of Working Memory
Says there are 2 distinct WM processes in the PFC
VLPFC (lower) → Maintainance of info
DLPFC (higher) → Manipulation of info
VLPFC in Petrides’ Theory of Working Memory
Lower; Maintenance of info
DLPFC in Petrides’ Theory of Working Memory
Higher; Manipulation of info
Self Ordered Pointing Task
Need to point at a pic then point at a dif pic; Requires maintenance + manipulation of info
PFC Damage + Self Ordered Pointing Task
Impairs performance on self ordered pointing task
Domains where Exec Funct are Important
Task setting + prob solving
Overcoming potent or habitual responses
Task switching
Multtasking
Tower of Hanoi Task
Need to place rings in largest to smallest order at the very end in the least amount of moves possible; Prob solving for exec funct
PFC Damage + Tower of Hanoi Task
Results in poor performance
Does Tower of Hanoi activate PFC?
Yes, in healthy controls
Stroop Test
Name the ink color not the word written; Requires inhibition
Incongruent trials harder than congruent trials
What does Stroop Test activate in brain?
Anterior Cingulate + pre SMA
Stop Signal Task Def
Speeded RT with rare “no go” cases; Requires inhibition
Stop Signal Task Part of Brain
Pre SMA (right lateral PFC if the task is hard)
What does PFC Damage do to inhibition + impulsivity?
Does NOT impair movement of execution of actions but DOES make actions disorganized/inapprop for current goals
Leads to failure to inhibit potent/habitual responses, so actions are driven by habits and/or objects in the environment rather than controlled goal driven behav (impulsivity); Preservation + utilization behav
Preservation
Repeating an action that has already been performed + is no longer relevant
PFC Damage
Utilization Behav
Impulsive actions on irrelevant objects in environ
PFC Damage
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) Def
You place a card + get feedback (right/wrong), and you infer a rule from the feedback; Sometimes the rule randomly switches, so must recog that the rule changes + infer new rule
Used to assess cog reasoning + exec funct/PFC damage; Tests task switching for exec funct
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) Types of Errors
Perseveration Errors
Non-Preservation Errors
Perseveration Errors
Continuing to use an old rule even after feedback that card placement was wrong; Reflects how quickly ppl can switch tasks/adapt to changing rules
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) Types of Errors
Non-Perseveration Errors
Other errors; Reflects how quickly ppl learn rules, random errors + luck
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) Types of Errors
What does WCST conflate?
Rule inference
Unpredictable switches
What does task switching reflect the cost of?
Inhibition of the old task
Is there a greater switching cost from a hard to easy task or easy to hard task?
Greater cost for hard to easy task
Ex. 2nd lang to first lang
Task Switching Brain Areas
Lateral + medial PFC
What part of the brain does switching responses (like left/right button) activate?
Medial PFC (pre SMA)
What part of the brain does switching attended stim (shape/color) activate?
Lateral PFC
6 Element Task
Have to do 6 open ended tasks (math, writing, names of pics, etc) in 15 min; There is not enough time to do all of the tasks but told to try all of them + there are restrictions on the order of tasks
Requires multitasking
6 Element Task + PFC Damage
Do very poorly
Some do okay on individual tasks
Some switch too often
Some spend too much time planning + taking notes
Is the PFC needed for actions that cannot be done on autopilot?
Yes
Ex. Actions that are involved in the interruption of ongoing behav or setting up novel actions/cog procedures
PFC’s Supervisory Attentional System (SAS)
Overrides automatic or environmental driven behav; Objects have action schemas (like a hammer/nail), and tasks/scripts are a hierarchal collection of obj schemas
SAS selects which schemas/scripts to use based on top down (goals) + bottom up (sensory info)
Top Down Info
Goals
PFC’s Supervisory Attentional System (SAS)
Bottom Up Info
Sensory info
PFC’s Supervisory Attentional System (SAS)
What do PFC lesions do to SAS?
Weaken SAS, which causes
Preservation
Difficulty setting up new schemas
Utilization behav (making sensory info win)
Issues with SAS Model
Some PFC patients with grossly disorganized real world behav pass standard tests
Some patients pass some tests, but not others (eg. multitasking impaired but not stroop)
Maybe tasks arent perfect
Lateral PFC
Cognitive, “cold” tasks; Monitoring, error correction
Orbito Frontal PFC
Emotional, “hot” tasks
Lateral PFC Left Side
“Task setting”, open ended tasks, switching rules
Lateral PFC Right Side
“Task monitoring”, sustained attention, keeping on task
Posterior PFC
Simple stim → Response mapping
Ex. Red stim → left button press
Anterior PFC
Complex mappings, multitasking’ Active when holding a goal in mind while performing a subgoal
Ex. red stim → left button press, but only if stim is also a vowel
WCST Like Task
Train ppl that certain shapes are rewarded + then reverse which shape is rewarded; Basically shift what dimension to attend to
Req reversal learning + set shifting
WCST Like Task for Orbito Frontal PFC Lesion
Poor reversal learning (emotional)
WCST Like Task for Lateral PFC Lesion
Poor set shifting (cognitive)
3 Main Divisions within PFC (Broad)
Lateral PFC (cognitive)
Medial PFC (social)
Orbital PFC (emotional)
Main Site of Exec Function
Frontal Lobes
Lateral Division of PFC
~Cognitive
3 Main Divisions within PFC (Broad)
Medial Division of PFC
~Social
3 Main Divisions within PFC (Broad)
Orbital Division of PFC
~Emotional
3 Main Divisions within PFC (Broad)
Somatic Marker Hypothesis
Emotional events (like a risky situation) store somatic markers in memory, which are stored in the orbiofrontal + ventromedial frontal cortex
Retrieving that emotional event reinstates the somatic marker + guides any behav (making a response more or less likely)
Could be conscious or unconscious
Where are somatic markers stored according to Somatic Marker Hypothesis?
Orbitofrontal + ventromedial frontal cortex
Iowa Gambling Task
Can choose from a good or bad deck; The bad deck has big rewards and big penalties, resulting in net loss but the good deck has small wins and small penalties resulting in net gain
Orbito-frontal Damage + Iowa Gambling Task
Do not learn to avoid the bad deck, unlike normal controls + do not develop anticipatory skin conductance response, only have them AFTER loss
What tasks are orbio-frontal damage patients impaired on?
Impaired on gambling/Iowa Gambling Task, but not WM, stroop, WCST
What tasks are lateral PFC damage patients impaired on?
Impaired on WCST + stroop but not on gambling/iowa gambling task
Criticisms of Somatic Marker Hypothesis/Gambling Task
Players may be making a conscious decision rather than an unconscious decision based on the skin conductance resp
Deficits may be due to reversal learning (bad decks initially receive large reward on first trial; and same frontal patients generally unimpaired if first trial omitted)
Multiple Demand Network Def
Tests of exec funct + fluid intelligence use the same brain regions (aka multiple demand network); Regions that are active whenever you do a task that is NOT automatic
Multiple Demand Network Areas
Lateral PFC
Parietal Lobe
Anterior Cingulate
PFC Damage + Multiple Demand Network
Impairs performance on exec funct and fluid intelligence (stroop, planning, wm, task switching) BUT NOT on crystallized intelligence (like vocab, general knowledge, facts)
Left Lateral PFC Damage Patients
Generally helps set up tasks/rules
So have trouble on task setting (esp tower of hanoi + open ended WCST) + task switching (take longer to switch rules than controls but faster than right PFC damage)
Right Lateral PFC Damage Patients
Generally helps with monitoring tasks/staying on rules
So have trouble with task monitoring/keeping on task + task switching (worse than left PFC patients bc likely to use old rule) + worse than left PFC at predictable WCST
Likely to make more random errors + revert to old rule in WCST than left PFC
Worse than left on predictable WCST (told the rule + when switches occur)
TMS of Left Dorsolateral PFC (LDLPFC)
Disrupts random digit generation
3 Roles of Right PFC
Monitoring (relating current info to task + checking whether info is valid)
Sustained Attention
Inhibiting Responses (eg. no go task) but could be failure to monitor
So active generally for externally presented info (perception tasks) + internally generated info (memory task)
When is Right PFC most active?
In conditions of uncertainty (like tip of the tongue, low confidence)
How is PFC ordered?
Hierarchally ordered
Damage to Anterior PFC
Impairs multitasking but not other exec funct tasks
When is Anterior Cingulate most active?
On error trial
Anterior Cingulate + Error Potential/Error Related Neg
An ERP wave that occurs after making an error; Prob originates from anterior cing
Is the PFC the only single source of exec function?
No