1/66
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
rationalism
human reasoning is primary source of knowledge/truth
empiricism
all knowledge/truth is derived from the senses alone
revelation
knowledge is revealed to humanity through encounter with god
theory of the forms
Plato’s theory of two worlds, reality and appearance
form of the god
the highest of all the forms; the source of knowledge
concept/ideal
the innate, ideal of an object eg, its cattiness
phenomena/particular
an object in the material world, reflecting the forms e.g a cat
form (ARISTOTLE)
what makes something recognisable it’s shape or structure
material cause
what is the object made of (matter?)
efficient cause
who made the object? who bought it into existence
formal cause
the shape, structure and characteristics of an object
final cause
the purpose (telos) of an object
prime mover
the unchanging final cause of all that exists
telos
end, result, purpose
body/soul distinction
the issue with personal identity - who am I?
dualism
the belief that humans have two elements- body and soul
substance dualism
two elements (body and soul) are wholly different substances
monism
the view that humans are one substance not two
materialism
the only substance is a material one
identity theory
all metal activity is centred in the brain and is purely physical
theistic monism
“we are an indissoluble (unable to be destroyed) psycho-physical unity (hick)also known as soft materialism
“soul one” - Dawkins
non-material life force (mystic jelly-dawkins); an ancient idea being killed by science
“soul two” - Dawkins
intellect, reason or consciousness
category error
incorrectly assuming that two terms (mind and body) are of the same logical type
a posteriori
an argument based on sense experience and observations of evidence
teleological argument
an argument for the existence of god starting with the observed design or telos
cosmological argument
an argument for the existence of god starting with observations from existence of the universe
infinite regress
a chain of events going backwards forever
aquinas’ three ways
way one- motion
way two- cause
way three- necessity and contingency
contingent
depends on something else for its existence, can cease to exist
necessary
must exist - holds the reason for its being within itself
design qua purpose
design “as relating to” purpose
design qua regularity
design “as relating to” the regular cycles and natural laws of the world
evolution/ natural selection
the process where organisms best adapted to their environment survive thus passing on their genes and the others die
epicurean hypothesis
given infinite time, an infinite number of particles could produce order
fallacy of composition
what is observed about the parts cannot be assumed to be the same as whole
paradox
a situation where two contradictory statements both appear true
eternal- timeless
god is outside of time and sees all events as an internal present
eternal - everlasting
god is within time and moving through time
“backwardly and forwardly eternal (Swinburne)
process theology
god moves through time with his creation and is effected by with interaction; god is powerful but not omnipotent
middle knowledge
god knows all the possibilities of your free choices
schleiermacher and omniscience
god’s knowledge is like that of close friends - can predict our future choices but free will is maintained
eternal - boethius
“eternity is the simultaneous possession of boundless life which is made clearer by comparison with temporal things”
simple necessity
the necessity of nature acting accordingly to the natural, physical laws of the universe
conditional necessity
dependent on the free choices made; “the addition of the condition”
euthyphro dilemma
is an action good because god commands it or does god command what is good
following necessity
the moment of free choice is known in gods eternal present; god is with us as the moment is in god
preceding necessity
refers to no free agent or choice, e.g gods knowledge of laws of nature
anslems four-dimensionalism
all times and places are equally real and present to god
presentism
only the present exists the past and future no not exist
univocal
the word has exactly the same meaning at all times e.g- boy
equivocal
the same word is used with two different completely meanings
cataphatic way
uses positive language to describe the qualities and nature of god
apophatic way
the via negativa - the negative way- the only legitimate way to talk about god is to say what he is not
analogy of attribution
a way of talking about god through attributing characteristics of the created to the creator
e.g good bread = good baker
sign
points to something outside of itself
symbol
participates in that no to which it points and conveys a depth of meaning often art an emotional level
cognitive
a statement that is subject to being true or false e.g “the cat is asleep on the teachers chair”
non cognitive
a statement that is not subject to truth or falsity e.g hurray or ouch
tautology
a logical statement true by definition
STRONG verification principle
a statement is only meaningful if it can be verified by an actual experience or is tautology
WEAK verification principle
a statement is meaningful if it is a tautology or it can be verified in principle
eschatological verification
religious statements will be verified at the end of life journey
synthetic statment
a statement that needs external evidence for it to be proven true or false
falsification principle
a statement for assessing whether statements are genuine scientific assertions by considering whether any evidence could disprove them
bilk
a world view which can be sane or insane; beyond judgement and reason
language games
words only have a specific meaning within the context of their own form of life