Vygotsky theory of cognitive development

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/4

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:24 PM on 2/9/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

5 Terms

1
New cards

Vygotsky principles AO1

  • Socio-cultural approach - proposed that cognitive development is primarily shaped by social and cultural factors, rather than being driven solely by biological maturation, as Piaget suggested

  • Children are apprentices who learn from the collaboration & support of experts

  • Believes humans are born with basic cognitive functions (eg attention and memory) which are then transformed into higher mental processes (eg problem solving) through social interaction, therefore acknowledging nature & nurture

2
New cards

Zone of proximal development AO1

  • The gap between what a child can achieve independently and what they can achieve with guidance and encouragement from a skilled partner

  • Eg a child may not be able to solve a jigsaw independently but the child would be able to do with the guidance of their parent with verbal instructions & encouragement

3
New cards

Scaffolding AO1

  • Support & guidance given from the expert to help the ‘apprentice’ complete the task within the ZOPD

  • Support can include verbal instructions, demonstrating how to do something, breaking the task into smaller sections & words of encouragement

  • Adult control & support is withdrawn as the child increases mastery & becomes more competent

4
New cards

Strengths AO3

  • P - research support

  • E - Wood & Middleton investigated how scaffolding from adults can help children complete tasks that they could not achieve alone. Children were given construction tasks using wooden blocks that were initially too difficult for them to complete independently. Parents provided varying levels of support, such as verbal prompts, demonstrations, or hints and support was gradually withdrawn as the child gained competence. They found that children were more successful at completing tasks independently with scaffolding than when working alone, demonstrating that the support had been internalised

  • T - This provides clear evidence for Vygotsky’s concepts of the zone of proximal development (ZPD) and scaffolding, showing that cognitive development is socially mediated rather than purely self-directed, therefore increasing the theory’s validity

  • P - practical applications in primary school education

  • E - due to vygtosky’s theory, the primary school education has adopted a collaborative approach. For example, teaching assistants or more knowledgeable peers can provide scaffolding to help children complete tasks they could not manage independently, gradually reducing support as competence increases. Similarly, group work allows children to learn from each other, observe strategies, and internalise new skills, reflecting the principle that cognitive development is socially mediated. These approaches demonstrate how Vygotsky’s ideas can enhance learning outcomes, as guidance and collaboration enable children to reach higher levels of understanding than they could achieve alone.

  • T - his theory has practical value for designing child-centred classrooms that promote active engagement, problem-solving, and independent thinking.

5
New cards

Limitations AO3

  • P - Piaget challenges Vygotsky’s theory

  • E - Piaget proposed that children are ‘lone scientists’ discovering rules and principles through interaction with the environment, whereas Vygotsky proposed children are apprentices who learn through observation, collaboration, and scaffolding from others. Piaget also showed that children can actively construct knowledge independently, through exploration and problem-solving, rather than relying primarily on guidance from adults or more knowledgeable others

  • T - these differences highlight that Vygotsky may overstate the role of social mediation, whereas Piaget’s work demonstrates that children also possess the ability to learn independently, suggesting a more balanced interaction between individual discovery and social influence may be necessary to fully explain cognitive development.

  • P culturally biased, meaning it does not necessarily generalise across all societies.

  • E - The theory assumes that children’s cognitive development primarily occurs through guided interaction with adults or more knowledgeable others (MKOs), often within structured learning environments. However, in many non-Western or traditional cultures, children learn cognitive skills through observation, imitation, and participation in everyday activities, rather than through formal adult guidance. For example, in some Indigenous communities, children acquire problem-solving, social, and practical skills by watching older siblings or community members rather than being directly taught.

  • T - This suggests that the emphasis on adult scaffolding and the “apprenticeship” model may not be universally applicable, making the theory ethnocentric. Consequently, Vygotsky’s theory may overstate the role of social mediation and underestimate alternative learning pathways, limiting its validity as a universal explanation of cognitive development.